Filings by Carrier and Service Proceeding | Front Page | Search
ALM
Antillean Airlines (Exemption, Miami-Dominican Republic)
ALM Antillean Airlines (Statements of Authorization, Engage in Code Share, Miami-Puerto Plata-Netherlands Antilles and Miami-Santo Domingo-Netherlands Antilles with United Air Lines)
OST-95-377 / Undocketed / Filed August 30, 1996
Application
for Renewal of an Exemption and Statements of Authorization
ALM requests that the Department (1) renew its exemption authorizing it to serve Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic as an intermediate point in conjunction with its Netherlands Antilles-Miami operations, and amend such authorization to permit ALM to serve Bonaire as well as Curacao; (2) renew its Statement of Authorization to display the "UA" airline designator code of United Air Lines, Inc. on flights ALM operates between Miami and the Netherlands Antilles via Santo Domingo and Puerto Plata, the Dominican Republic, pursuant to its code-share agreement with United; (3) renew its Statement of Authorization (Number 95-748) to display the "UA" designator code on flights ALM operates between Caracas, Venezuela and Curacao, Netherlands Antilles; and (4) renew its Statement of Authorization (Number 95-351) to display the "UA" designator code on flights ALM operates between Miami, on the one hand, and Curacao and Bonaire, Aruba, and Port-au-Prince, Haiti, on the other hand. ALM requests renewal for a term of two years.
Counsel: ALM and Ginsburg Feldman
ALM
Antillean Airlines (Exemption Renewal, Curacao-Atlanta)
OST-96-1720 (formerly 47444) / Filed September 19, 1996
Emergency
Application for Renewal of an Exemption
ALM has been operating Atlanta-Netherlands Antilles, service, via Aruba, continuously since its initial authorization to do so by Order 91-8-2. The service is currently being offered twice weekly with MD-80 equipment configured with 146 seats.
Counsel: Ginsburg Feldman
ALM
Antillean Airlines (Notice of Action Taken)
OST-95-377 / Posted September 20, 1996
Renew and Amend exemption to serve Puerto Plata, as an intermediate point on currently-authorized Curacao/Bonaire-Miami operations. Renew statements of authorization to display the United designator code on operations between (1) Curacao and Miami via Puerto Plata/Santo Domingo; (2) Caracas and Curacao; and (3) Curacao/Bonaire and Miami via Aruba/Port-au-Prince
ALM
Antillean Airlines (Notice of Action Taken)
OST-96-1720 / Posted September 20, 1996
Renew exemption to conduct scheduled foreign air transportation between Curacao/Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles, and Atlanta, GA, via the intermediate point Aruba
ALM
Antillean Airlines (Notice of Action Taken - Corrected)
OST-96-1720 / Posted September 20, 1996
RENEW exemption from 49 U.S.C. 41301 to conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Curacao/Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles, and Atlanta, GA, via the intermediate point Aruba.
ALM
Antillean Airlines N.V. (Exemption, Curacao-Ft. Lauderdale)
OST-96-1814 / Filed September 27, 1996
A liberal bilateral regime exists between the U.S. and the Netherlands Antilles; Ft. Lauderdale does not receive single--plane U.S. carrier passenger service to the Netherlands Antilles; and ALM is prepared to start Curacao-Ft. Lauderdale service December 1, 1996. This commencement date would allow this attractive transportation alternative to be available to passengers and shippers during the peak of the winter season, when travel to the Caribbean from the U.S. is most popular.
Counsel: ALM and Ginsburg Feldman
OST-96-1814 / Filed September 30, 1996
Re: Application of ALM
Copy of Attachment A, the schedule of services proposed for Ft. Lauderdale-Curacao.
Routing is: Depart CUR at 0830 - Arrive AUA at 0855 - Depart AUA at 0925 - Arrive FLL at 1115 / Depart FLL at 1210 - Arrive AUA at 1600 - Depart AUA at 1630 - Arrive CUA at 1700
Counsel: Ginsburg Feldman
ALM
Antillean Airlines N.V. (Notice of Action Taken)
OST-96-1814 / Posted October 22, 1996
Exemption from 49 U.S.C. 41301 to conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Curacao, Netherlands Antilles, and Ft. Lauderdale, FL, via the intermediate point Aruba.
ALM Antillean Airlines N.V. (Exemption)
OST-96-1939 / Filed November 12, 1996
Letter
of Intent between American and ALM
The purpose for this exemption is to implement a Code-Share Agreement made between ALM and American Airlines, Inc. Petitions the Department to grant by exemption economic operating authority to operate flights between San Juan and Miami as coterminal points and St. Maarten in the Netherlands Antilles, and between Miami and Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, New York/Newark, and Philadelphia as points beyond Miami and between San Juan and Boston, Chicago, Miami, New York/Newark, and Philadelphia as points beyond San Juan.
Counsel: ALM and Condon Forsyth
American Airlines, Inc. and ALM Antillean Airlines N.V. (Exemptions and for Statements of Authorization to Engage in Code Sharing)
OST-96-1939 / 96-1940 / 96-1941 / 96-1942 / Undocketed / Filed November 7, 1996
Consolidated
Answer of United Air Lines
The adverse consequences that would result from allowing American and ALM to code share exceed by a wide margin any consumer benefits that might be claimed from the alliance. Approval would, therefore, not be consistent with the pubic interest and the applications of American and ALM should be denied. United would urge that it consolidate these American code share applications with those now under consideration in the American/TACA Group Reciprocal Code Share Services Proceeding.
Counsel: United and Ginsburg Feldman
ALM Antillean Airlines and American Airlines, Inc. (Exemptions and Statements of Authorization, Reciprocal Code Sharing)
OST-96-1939 / 96-1940 / 96-1941 / 96-1942 / Undocketed / Filed December 9, 1996
Instead of offering a single reason why it is unable to serve these markets, United complains about what it calls American’s strength in the Caribbean region. American’s strong position in US-Caribbean markets comes from its willingness to invest aircraft, facilities, and personnel to provide service. American’s position in these open-entry markets stands in sharp contrast to United’s highly protected dominance in US-Asia markets where competitors are kept out by governmental agreement.
Counsel: American, Carl Nelson, 202.496.5647
The DOT should not sabotage ALM’s interests and the interests of the public because of competitive concerns among US carriers or because they lost the competition. United says it lost its ability to participate in these markets. How? United can operate and compete in these markets today and tomorrow. The objections of United and TWA are without substance.
Counsel: Condon Forsyth, Thomas Whalen, 202.289.0500
American Airlines, Inc. and ALM Antillean Airlines N.V. (Exemptions and Statements of Authorization to Engage in Code Sharing)
OST-96-1939 / 96-1940 / 96-1941 / 96-1942 / Undocketed / Filed December 18, 1996
Consolidated
Response of United Air Lines and Motion for Leave to File
Exhibit
UA-101 - Comparison of American's Departure Share at MIA to United's Departure
Share at Tokyo-Narita
The results of America’s domination of service in the Caribbean/Latin American region are evidenced by the higher yields its dominant position is producing from its operations in this area as compared to other international markets. Thus, in the most recent quarter American’s yields from its U.S.-Caribbean/Latin American services were 14.20 cents per mile, or 27 percent higher than the overall U.S. carrier yield from international services of 11.17 cents per mile. And while overall international yields declined by two percent in third quarter 1996 over third quarter 1995, America’s Caribbean/Latin American yields increased by one percent. American is now seeking to further enhance and entrench its dominance in this region by entering into cooperative marketing relationships with Caribbean and Latin American foreign flag carriers.
Counsel: United and Ginsburg, Feldman, Joel Stephen Burton, 202.637.9130
Filings by Carrier and Service Proceeding | Front Page | Search