<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Daily Airline Filings</title>
        <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
        <description>Airline Documents - Route Applications / Startup Airlines - Airline filings made with the US Department of Transportation - DOT - Commercial Aviation - Airport - Airports</description>
        <generator>Feeder 2.3.1(1625); Mac OS X Version 10.6.8 (Build 10K549) http://reinventedsoftware.com/feeder/</generator>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>info@airlineinfo.com</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@airlineinfo.com</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>info@airlineinfo.com</webMaster>
        <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:38:16 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:38:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <category domain="http://airlineinfo.com">Airline Information</category>
        <category domain="http://airlineinfo.com">Airline Documents</category>
        
        <atom:link href="http://airlineinfo.com/dailyairline.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Victoria, TX - Proposal of SeaPort</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easvic51412"></a><b>Essential Air Service at Victoria, Texas</b></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0520454.html">OST-2005-20454</a></p>
                    <p>May 9, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/376.pdf">Proposal of <strong>SeaPort Airlines</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">The proposal consists of 24 frequencies a week to Dallas (Love Field) and Houston, which is compliant with the Departments directive in <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120314.html">Order 2012-3-14</a> requesting: &ldquo;two round trips a day (12 a week) with 30-seat or larger aircraft; or three round trips a day (18 a week) with 19-seat aircraft and additional frequencies with 8/9 seat aircraft.&quot;                    </p>
                    <p class="justified">SeaPort Airlines proposes to serve Victoria with Pilatus PC-12 aircraft configured for 9-passengers and two pilots.</p>
                    <p><em>By: SeaPort, Timothy Sieber, 971-340-1716</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flyvictoriatx.com/">http://www.flyvictoriatx.com/</a> - Victoria Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:38:07 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5873CDE9-1B7C-46B3-B9EA-3EE4068EC001</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ExpressJet Airlines - Atlanta-Cozumel</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="expressjet51412"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/expressjet.htm">ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p>OST-2012- Exemption - Atlanta-Cozumel</p>
                    <p>May 14, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/390.pdf">Application for an Exemption</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">ExpressJet plans to operate Atlanta-Cozumel year-round scheduled service as a Delta Connection carrier with 76-seat CRJ-900 or 65-seat CRJ-700 aircraft from its existing fleet, as demand requires, and will commence service on or about September 1, 2012, provided that all necessary approvals have been secured. ExpressJet will operate these services pursuant to a capacity purchase agreement with Delta.s Delta holds certificate authority for this route. Delta's Atlanta-Cozumel service is currently operated by Delta Connection carrier, Pinnacle. See <a href="../ostdocket2010/order20100312.html">Order 2010-3-12</a> (issuing Delta's consolidated US-Mexico certificate authority).</p>
                    <p class="justified">Delta's designator code will be displayed on flights operated by ExpressJet pursuant to the requested authority.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Crowell &amp; Moring, Gerald Murphy, 202-508-8855</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.expressjet.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.expressjet.com/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:37:38 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">9B7950B0-9D76-463C-8691-518275FC9B7A</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DCA Slots - Granting Beyond-Perimeter Slot Exemptions</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="dca51412"></a><strong>Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Slot Exemption Proceedings</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120512.html">Order 2012-5-12</a><br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120029.html">OST-2012-0029</a></p>
                    <p>Issued and Served May 14, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/386.pdf">Order Granting Beyond-Perimeter Slot Exemptions</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">The Department grants slot exemptions to Alaska Airlines, Inc. (two slot exemptions to serve Portland Int'l Airport); jetBlue Airways Corporation (two slot exemptions to serve Luis Mu&ntilde;oz Mar&iacute;n Int'l Airport); Southwest Airlines Co. (two slot exemptions to serve Austin-Bergstrom Int'l Airport); and Virgin America, Inc. (two slot exemptions to serve San Francisco Int'l Airport).</p>
                    <p class="justified">We will require that the awardees inaugurate full service by no later than September 8, 2012. The slot exemptions granted must be conducted with single-aisle Stage 3 aircraft, may not be used for operations between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., and may not increase the number of operations at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in any one-hour period during the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:59 p.m. by more than five operations. These carriers are advised to exercise maximum flexibility in proposed operating times to ensure compliance with these limits.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Susan Kurland</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p class="smalltext"><a href="/ostpdf84/383.pdf">DOT Selects Four Cities to Receive New Nonstop Service to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airpor</a>t - DOT Press Release</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:37:13 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">0FC226AF-81C5-4177-AF9F-BC9AED7061BD</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AeroMexico - Guadalajara-Chicago</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aeromexico51012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aeromexicofilings.html">Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.</a></strong></p>
					<p>OST-2012-0069 - Exemption - Guadalajara-Chicago</p>
					<p>May 10, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/365.pdf">Application for an Exemption</a></p>
					<p class="justified">AeroMexico respectfully requests an exemption from the provisions of 49 USC &sect; 41301 to the extent necessary to permit AeroMexico to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Guadalajara, Mexico and Chicago, Illinois using Boeing B737. So that it may begin service in June 2012, AeroMexico requests expedited consideration of this application.					</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Mietus Law, John Mietus, 202-747-5212</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.aeromexico.com/http://www.aeromexico.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.aeromexico.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 07:34:24 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7C53C307-F370-4D8A-8D29-F17B5F9E9665</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>VIH Cougar Helicopters - Comments of PHI Helicopters</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="cougar51012"></a><strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc.</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120022.html">OST-2012-0022</a> - Submission of Aviation Consumer Protection Division Webpage On-Line Aviation Complaint Form</p>
                    <p>May 9, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/362.pdf">Comments of <strong>PHI Helicopters</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">On May 7, 2012 Counsel for VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc wrote you concerning the sale of certain assets of VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc. In that letter he requested that the Department stay further proceedings in Docket <a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120022.html">OST-2012-0022</a> pursuant to VIH Cougar's Motion of April 2, 2012 to Stay Proceedings in that docket.</p>
                    <p class="justified">PHI Helicopters filed its Answer to the Motion to Stay, opposing the Stay, on April 2, 2012. After an investigation covering four years, and over 7 months after: the Department notified VIH Cougar of its intention to take action against their non-citizen operations if not divested within 30 days, VIH Cougar continues to play for time while operating unlawfully.</p>
                    <p class="justified">We believe that the Department should. continue with the proceedings to their logical conclusion, the withdrawal of VIH Cougar's certification. However, if the Department does consider new ownership structures for VIH Cougar that result in new owners for the existing Certificates, the transfer of ownership should be subject to full transparency and public vetting of the ownership structure. There is no reason to give VIHAG and VIH Cougar any ability to continue to hide the ownership of those certificates from full public scrutiny. Any proposed sale that includes certificate authority should be made part of the existing Docket and the public given the opportunity to examine the structure.</p>
<p>                    <p><em>Counsel: K&amp;L Gates, Jonathan Blank, 202-661-6250</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 07:33:47 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">DAE8BAFE-AD3F-4F01-9C4F-B28EC4BFFC58</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>2012 Small Community Air Service Development - Notice Soliciting Proposals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="scasd51012"></a><strong>2012 Small Community Air Service Development</strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-5-8<br>
				    OST-2012-0069</p>
					<p>Issued May 9, 2012 | On File at Federal Register May 12, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/363.pdf">Notice of Order Soliciting Community Proposals</a></p>
					<p class="justified">By this order, the Department invites proposals from communities and/or consortia of communities interested in obtaining a federal grant under the Small Community Air Service Development Program to address air service and airfare issues in their communities. Applications must be submitted to <a href="http://www.grants.gov">www.grants.gov</a> no later than 5 PM EDT on Monday, June 11, 2012.</p>
					<p><em>By: Robert Letteney</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="/ostdocket2002/ost0211590.htm">2002 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
					    <a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0315065.html">2003 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
					    <a href="/ostdocket2004/ost0417343.html">2004 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
					    <a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0520127.html">2005 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
					    <a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0623671.html">2006 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
					    <a href="/ostdocket2007/ost0727370.html">2007 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
					    <a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080100.html">2008 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
					    <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090149.html">2009 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
				      <a href="../ostdocket2010/ost20100124.html">2010 Small Community Air Service</a><br>
<p>				      </font><span class="smalltext"><a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2011/ost20110119.html">2011 Small Community Air Service</a></span></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 07:33:18 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">69760289-A5BC-41A3-96A1-C2E7D63FD435</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Merced and Visalia, CA - Requesting Proposals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<br>
                      <br>
                    <a name="easca51012"></a><strong>Essential Air Service Merced and Visalia, California</strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-5-11<br>
                      <a href="../ostdocket/ost983521.htm">OST-1998-3521</a> - Merced<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2004/ost0419916.html">OST-2004-19916</a> - Visalia</p>
                    <p>Issued and Served May 10, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/364.pdf">Order Requesting Proposals</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is requesting proposals from carriers interested in providing Essential Air Service at Merced and/or Visalia, California, for a new contract period, beginning October 1, 2012, with or without subsidy. Carriers should file their proposals no later than June 11, 2012.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Specifically, for service with 19-seat or larger aircraft, we expect proposals for two or three round trips a day (12 or 18 a week) to Los Angeles, Las Vegas, or any other large or medium hub airport offering numerous connections to the national air transportation system. If 8/9-seat aircraft are proposed, we would expect four or five round trips a day (24 or 30 a week).</p>
                    <p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.ci.visalia.ca.us/depts/airport/default.asp">http://www.ci.visalia.ca.us/depts/airport/default.asp</a> - Visalia Municipal Airport<br>
<p>                      <a href="http://www.cityofmerced.org/depts/airport/default.asp">http://www.cityofmerced.org/depts/airport/default.asp</a> - Merced Municipal Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 07:32:53 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">0BA77D72-4F23-4716-B1C8-F549F413765B</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IATA - Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010r from Myanmar to North, Central Pacific / Special Passenger Amending Resolution from Myanmar to TC123 / TC23 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010q from Myanmar to TC23 Middle East/Africa</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="iata5912"></a><strong><a href="../iata/iata.html">International Air Transport Association</a></strong></p>
                    <p><br>
                    </p>
                    <p>OST-2012-0070</p>
                    <p>May 8, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/338.pdf">Application for Approval of Agreements</a></p>
                    <p>TC31 &ndash; Mail Vote 711<br>
                      Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010r from Myanmar to North, Central Pacific<br>
                      Intended effective Date: 4 May 2012<br>
                    (Memo 0535)</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: IATA, Douglas Lavin</em></p>
                    <p><br>
                    OST-2012-0071</p>
                    <p>May 8, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/341.pdf">Application for Approval of Agreements</a></p>
                    <p>TC31 &ndash; Mail Vote 709<br>
                    TC123 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010p<br>
                    Special Passenger Amending Resolution from Myanmar to TC123<br>
                      Intended effective Date: 4 May 2012<br>
                    (Memo 0486)</p>
<p><em>Counsel: IATA, Douglas Lavin</em><br>
  <br>
  <br>
OST-2012-0072</p>
<p>May 8, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/342.pdf">Application for Approval of Agreements</a></p>
<p>TC23 &ndash; Mail Vote 710<br>
  TC23 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010q from Myanmar to TC23 Middle East/Africa<br>
  Intended effective Date: 4 May 2012<br>
  (Memos 0462/0467)</p>
<p><em>Counsel: IATA, Douglas Lavin</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.iata.org/" class="smalltext">http://www.iata.org/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:51:37 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">56C886FB-95DD-4FC1-9D47-6FAC14528654</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Baker's Bay Associates - Corrected Copy of Appendix (Indirect Foreign Air Transportation)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="bakersbay5912"></a><strong>Baker's Bay Associates, LLC</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120053.html">OST-2012-0053</a> - Exemption - Indirect Foreign Air Transportation</p>
                    <p>May 9, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/339.pdf">Corrected Copy of Appendix</a></p>
<p>                    <p><em>Counsel: Cozen O'Connor, Mark Atwood, 202-463-2513</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:51:11 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">888D501D-B514-4739-9945-F4B345291D66</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Caribbean Airlines - Reply of CAL (Trinidad &amp; Tobago-US via Intermediate Points)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="cal5912"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/caribair.html">Caribbean Airlines Limited</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0626586.html">OST-2006-26586</a> - Exemption - Trinidad &amp; Tobago-US via Intermediate Points</p>
<p>May 9, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/349.pdf">Reply of <strong>Caribbean Airlines</strong></a></p>
<p class="justified">John P.T. Gilmore, apparently writing from neither the US nor the Caribbean, has yet to provide an explanation for his interest in CAL's US operations or his purpose in continuing to oppose them in this forum. Nor has any other person commented either on CAL's applications or Gilmore's assertions in this docket. Having been so often repeated, these assertions do no more than hamper the licensing process.</p>
<p class="justified">It remains in the public interest for the Department to renew, without interruption, CAL's authority to provide service to and from the United States. The 2010 Trinidad and Tobago-US bilateral air services agreement, like its predecessor, clearly provides for such authority. CAL has held such authority for many years and has operated to the US a variety of services from Trinidad and Tobago and other Caribbean points. Passengers and shippers rely on CAL's service between the US and its home country.</p>
<p><em>Counsel: Mietus Law, John Mietus, 202-747-5212</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.caribbean-airlines.com/">http://www.caribbean-airlines.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:50:46 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">F3546384-99AF-4E50-89C7-584231EFB5B9</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DCA Slots - DOT Memo - Notices of Communication</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="dca5912"></a><strong>Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Slot Exemption Proceedings</strong></p>
                  <p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120029.html">OST-2012-0029</a></p>
                  <p><br>
                  </p>
                  <p>May 8, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/346.pdf"><strong>DOT</strong> Memorandum - Notice of Communication</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">On April 23, 2012, during a telephone conversation with Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, the Senator raised the subject of the Department's proceeding to allocate eight slot exemptions to new entrant and/ or limited incumbent carriers for operations between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and airports beyond the 1250-mile DCA perimeter. The Senator expressed her support for the application filed by Southwest Airlines for nonstop service between DCA and Austin.</p>
                  <p class="justified">I informed the Senator that, while I appreciated her interest in this case, I could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the Department.</p>
                  <p><em>By: Ray LaHood</em></p>
                  <p>&nbsp;</p>
                  <p>May 8, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/348.pdf"><strong>DOT</strong> Memorandum - Notice of Communication</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">On May 4, 2012, during a telephone conversation with Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, the Congresswoman raised the subject of the Department's proceeding to allocate eight slot exemptions to new entrant and/ or limited incumbent carriers for operations between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and airports beyond the 1250-mile DCA perimeter. The Congresswoman expressed her support for the application filed by Southwest Airlines for nonstop service between DCA and Austin.</p>
                  <p class="justified">I informed the Congresswoman that, while I appreciated her interest in this case, I could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the Department.</p>
<p>                  <p><em>By: Ray LaHood</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:50:17 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">C6AE1C95-4FE8-4A48-BDE3-BEB938E11461</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL - Letters in Support of Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easms5912"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, Mississippi and Muscle Shoals, Alabama</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket/ost007856.htm">OST-2000-7856</a> - Muscle Shoals, AL<a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080209.html"><br>
                      OST-2008-0209</a> - Greenville, MS<br>
  <a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2001/ost0110685.htm">OST-2001-10685</a> - Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS<br>
  <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090305.html">OST-2009-0305</a> - Tupelo, MS</p>
                    <p>May 4, 2012</p>
                    <p>Letters in Support of <strong>Silver Airways</strong>:</p>
                  <ul>
                      <li><a href="/ostpdf84/347.pdf"><strong>City of Laurel</strong></a></li>
                      <li><strong><a href="/ostpdf84/351.pdf">Economic Development Authority of Jones County</a></strong></li>
<p>                      <li><a href="/ostpdf84/336.pdf"><strong>Union County Board of Supervisors</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:49:38 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">835396AD-1FEF-4213-9DCD-8F5ADF32099F</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Healy Lake, AK - DOT Request of Wright Air Service for Subsidy Clarification</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[</p>
<p><a name="healylake5912"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Healy Lake, Alaska</strong></p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket/ost983546.htm">OST-1998-3546</a></p>
					<p>May 3, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/334.pdf">DOT Request of Wright Air Service for Subsidy Clarification</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Can you please provide with a breakdown of how you calculated the needed subsidy? Please include such information as revenue (passenger rates by block hour, cargo rates by BH, total operating revenue, etc.) and operating expense (pilot and co-pilot rates per BH, fuel, maintenance, depreciation, insurance, etc.).</p>
<p>					<p><em>By: DOT, Scott Faulk, 202-366-9721</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:48:50 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">77B4D26E-67F4-4E03-B35D-DAC4573AC813</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Kake, AK - Proposal of Air Excursions</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easkake5912"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Kake, Alaska</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080217.html">OST-2008-0217</a></p>
                    <p>May 8, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/337.pdf">Proposal of <strong>Air Excursions</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">At Kake Air Excursions proposes to provide 14 round trips per week during the 21 week peak summer period, and 7 round trips per week during the 31 week off-peak period. This is the same schedule as proposed by Wings in 2008, and operated for the last two years by Air Excursions. The aircraft to be used is a nine passenger all-weather aircraft. When loads or weather do not require, Air Excursions will use a five passenger aircraft at a lower subsidy need per flight.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Mike Loverink </em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kake_Airport">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kake_Airport</a> - Kake Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:48:22 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">46F6C614-6013-4822-96FD-0448EC421146</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Bradford, DuBois and Oil City/Franklin, PA, Jamestown, NY, Kirksville, MO and Parkersburg, WV/Marietta, OH - Requesting Proposals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[</p>
<p><a name="easpaetc5912"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Bradford, DuBois and Oil City/Franklin, Pennsylvania, Jamestown, New York, Kirksville, Missouri and Parkersburg, West Virginia/Marietta, Ohio</strong></p>
<p>Order 2012-5-10<br>
  <a href="../ostdocket2003/ost0314528.htm">OST-2003-14528</a> - Bradford<br>
  <a href="../ostdocket2003/ost0314950.htm">OST-2003-14950</a> - Jamestown<br>
  <a href="/ostdocket2004/ost0417617.html">OST-2004-17617</a> - DuBois<br>
  <a href="../ostdocket/ost972523.htm">OST-1997-2523</a> - Oil City/Franklin<br>
  <a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket/ost972515.htm">OST-1997-2515</a> - Kirksville<br>
  <a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0520734.html">OST-2005-20734</a> - Parkersburg</p>
<p>Issued and Served May 9, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/345.pdf">Order Requesting Proposals</a></p>
<p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is requesting proposals from carriers interested in providing Essential Air Service at Bradford, DuBois and Oil City/Franklin, Pennsylvania; Jamestown, New York; Kirksville, Missouri; and Parkersburg, West Virginia/Marietta, Ohio, beginning October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2014, with or without subsidy. Proposals are due June 7, 2012.</p>
<p class="justified">With respect to all six communities, we ask that carriers submit proposals for service consistent with the communities are currently receiving. For DuBois and Parkersburg, four round trips per weekday and weekend (24 total per week) with 19-seat aircraft. Parkersburg&rsquo;s service should be all nonstop to/from the hub. For Bradford and Jamestown, three nonstop or one-stop round trips each weekday and weekend (18 total per week) with 19-seat aircraft. For Kirksville, three round trips each day (21 total per week) with nine-seat aircraft. For Franklin, two round trips each weekday and weekend (12 total per week) with 19-seat aircraft. Service should serve to Cleveland, Detroit, Washington Dulles, St. Louis, or another suitable hub where numerous connections to the national air transportation system can be made. The Department may consider larger aircraft with fewer frequencies per day or if smaller aircraft are proposed (for communities other than Kirksville), we will consider additional frequencies.</p>
<p class="justified">We request that carriers interested in providing Essential Air Service at Bradford, DuBois, Franklin, Jamestown, Kirksville, and/or Parkersburg, for the two-year period from October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2014, submit their proposals, with or without requests for subsidy, no later than June 7, 2012.</p>
<p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
<blockquote>
  <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.bradfordairport.net/">http://www.bradfordairport.net/</a> - Bradford Regional Airport<br>
    <a href="http://www.co.chautauqua.ny.us/airport/airport.htm">http://www.co.chautauqua.ny.us/airport/airport.htm</a>- Chautauqua County Airport<br>
    <a href="http://www.dujairport.com/">http://www.dujairport.com/</a> - DuBois Regional Airport<br>
    <a href="http://www.flyfranklin.org/">http://www.flyfranklin.org/</a> - Venango Regional Airport<br>
    <a href="http://www.kirksvillecity.com/content/72/152/default.aspx">http://www.kirksvillecity.com/content/72/152/default.aspx</a> - Kirksville Regional Airport<br>
<p>    <a href="http://www.flymov.com/">http://www.flymov.com/</a> - Mid-Ohio Valley Regional Airport/Parkersburg</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:47:53 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">70FAF38E-F774-4712-A045-4FD263D5E599</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, WV - Extending Service Obligation</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easgreenbrier5912"></a><b>Essential Air Service at Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia</b></p>
<p>Order 2012-5-9<a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0315553.html"><br>
  OST-2003-15553</a></p>
<p>Issued and Served May 9, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/344.pdf">Order Extending Service Obligation</a></p>
<p class="justified">By this Order, we extend the Essential Air Service obligation of Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. and ExpressJet Airlines (formerly known as Atlantic Southeast Airlines, renamed ExpressJet Airlines effective December 31, 2011) d/b/a Delta Connection at Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia for an additional 30 days, through June 13, 2012.</p>
<p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.lewisburg-wv.com/">http://www.lewisburg-wv.com/</a> - Greenbrier Valley Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:47:22 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">6157C50D-5EDC-4640-AA6F-205B8964A55A</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>People Express Airlines - Consent Order (Air Transportation Advertising)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="people5912"></a><strong><a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2012/ost20120042.html">People Express Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-5-7<br>
                    <a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120002.html">OST-2012-0002</a> - Violations of 49 USC &sect; 41101 and 14 CFR 201.5(a)</p>
                    <p>Issued and Served May 9, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/340.pdf">Consent Order</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">This order concerns the offer and sale of memberships by People Express Airlines, Inc. in its &ldquo;Club Travelati&rdquo; in violation of 49 USC &sect; 41101 and 14 CFR 201.5(a). It directs People Express to cease and desist from future violations of these provisions and assesses People Express a compromise civil penalty of $10,000.</p>
                    <p class="justified">People Express is a Virginia-based corporation. It does not hold economic authority from the Department to engage in air transportation. On March 19, 2012, People Express applied for authority to engage in interstate scheduled passenger air transportation. Its application is currently pending with the Department. Between February 13 and March 27, 2012, People Express advertised on its Internet website memberships in its &ldquo;Club Travelati&rdquo; by offering prospective members, among other things, the opportunity to receive after scheduled service began &ldquo;ULTRA-LOW discount offers&rdquo; and discount certificates to be used towards their first &ldquo;PEOPLExpress&trade; ticket for any scheduled flight or fare.&rdquo; As a result, People Express sold more than 130 memberships through its website. By advertising and selling club memberships offering future discounts before it received effective economic authority for that service, People Express violated 49 USC &sect; 41101 and 14 CFR 201.5.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Rosalind Knapp</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2012/ost20120042.html">OST-2012-0042</a> - People Express Airlines - Interstate Scheduled Passenger Certificate</p>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_Express_Airlines_(2012)" class="smalltext">http://www.flypex.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 07:46:52 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2A9DFFF6-0059-469B-A243-ECB1CB21C6A6</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AeroUnion - Monterrey-Cincinnati All-Cargo</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aerounion5812"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aerotranspotedecargaunion.htm">Aerotransporte de Carga Union, S.A. de C.V.</a></strong></p>
					<p>OST-2012-0068 - Exemption - Monterrey-Cincinnati All-Cargo</p>
					<p>May 7, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/319.pdf">Application for an Exemption</a></p>
					<p class="justified">AeroUnion hereby submits its application for an Exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to the extent necessary to permit AeroUnion to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between the co-terminal points Mexico City and Monterrey, Mexico and the terminal point Cincinnati, Ohio.</p>
					<p class="justified">Round-trip non-stop service will be operated once-per-week using AeroUnion's A-300B4-203F aircraft.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Pierre Murphy, 202-776-3980</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.aerounion.com.mx/" class="smalltext">http://www.aerounion.com.mx/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:10:37 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">749B8075-2840-4F3F-A2C9-C65C74F54660</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tyrolean Airways - US-EU Codesharing with United, US Airways and Austrian Airlines / Codesharing with United Amendment</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<br>
				    <a name="tyrolean5812"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/tyroleanairways.htm">Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt GesmbH</a></strong></p>
					<p><br>
					</p>
				  <p>OST-2012-0067 - Statement of Authorization - US-EU Codesharing with United, US Airways and Austrian Airlines</p>
				  <p>May 7, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/318.pdf">Application for Statement of Authorization</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">Tyrolean requests a statement of authorization to allow United's, US Airways', Austrian's and any other duly authorized US air carrier's designator codes to be displayed on Tyrolean's flights:</p>
				  <ol>
				    <li class="justified">between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in the European Union (on a non-stop basis and on routings via intermediate points);</li>
				    <li class="justified">between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in the European Common Aviation Area;</li>
				    <li class="justified">between European Union points;</li>
				    <li class="justified">beyond the European Union to any point or points; and</li>
				    <li class="justified">beyond the United States to any point or points</li>
			      </ol>
				  <p class="justified">Tyrolean initially plans to display United's, US Airways' and Austrians' designator codes on Tyrolean's flights between Vienna, Austria, on the one hand, and New York (JFK) and Washington, DC, on the other.</p>
				  <p><em>Counsel: Lufthansa, Arthur Molins, 516-296-9234</em></p>
				  <p><br>
				    <br>
			      <a href="/ostdocket/ost007838.htm">OST-2000-7838</a> - Exemption - Codesharing with United Air Lines</p>
				  <p>May 7, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/322.pdf">Application for Amendment	of	an	Exemption</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">Tyrolean hereby requests that the Department amend Tyrolean's exemption from	49	USC	41301	to authorize Tyrolean to engage in:</p>
				  <ol>
				    <li class="justified">scheduled and charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail from any point or points behind Member State(s) of the European Union, via any point or points in any Member State(s) and via intermediate points, to any point or points in the United States and beyond;</li>
				    <li class="justified">scheduled and charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in any member of the European Common Aviation Area;</li>
				    <li class="justified">other charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail pursuant to the prior approval requirements under 14 CFR Part 212; and</li>
				    <li class="justified">transportation authorized by any additional route or other rights made available to European Community carriers in the future.</li>
			      </ol>
				  <p class="justified">Tyrolean plans to initiate the proposed services on or after July 1, 2012.</p>
				  <p><em>Counsel: Lufthansa, Arthur Molins, 516-296-9234</em></p>
				  <blockquote>
<p>				    <p><a href="http://www.tyrolean.at/http://www.tyrolean.at/" class="smalltext">http://www.tyrolean.at/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:09:51 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">43ABD8D0-2A18-46CC-9020-A42634EA470D</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL - Letters in Support of Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="eas5812"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Greenville, Laurelo/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, Mississippi and Muscle Shoals, Alabama</strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost007856.htm">OST-2000-7856</a> - Muscle Shoals, AL<a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080209.html"><br>
OST-2008-0209</a> - Greenville, MS<br>
<a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2001/ost0110685.htm">OST-2001-10685</a> - Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS<br>
<a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090305.html">OST-2009-0305</a> - Tupelo, MS</p>
<p>May 4, 2012</p>
<p>Letters in Support of <strong>Silver Airways</strong>:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="/ostpdf84/323.pdf"><strong>City of Greenville</strong></a></li>
  <li><a href="/ostpdf84/330.pdf"><strong>City of Muscle Shoals</strong></a></li>
  <li><strong><a href="/ostpdf84/324.pdf">Greenville Mid-Delta Airport</a></strong></li>
  <li><strong><a href="/ostpdf84/328.pdf">Hattiesburg-Laurel Regional Airport</a></strong></li>
<p>  <li><a href="/ostpdf84/326.pdf"><strong>Shoals Chamber of Commerce</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:09:24 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">15418218-17D8-47FA-9FE1-CC9B01D79ACC</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>US-Japan Alliance Case - Joint Venture Implementation Verifications</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="usjapan5812"></a><strong>US-Japan Alliance Case</strong></p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100059.html">OST-2010-0059</a></p>
				  <p>May 8, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/329.pdf">Joint Venture Implementation Verifications</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">In accordance with <a href="../ostdocket2010/order20101110.html">Order 2010-11-10</a>, ordering paragraph 2, attached are verifications from ANA, United and Continental that the ANA-Continental-United Transpacific Joint Venture Agreement approved and immunized by <a href="../ostdocket2010/order20101110.html">Order 2010-11-10</a> and provided to you today has been executed and implemented</p>
<p>				  <p><em>Counsel: United, Steve Morrissey</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:08:59 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">C5A73AF9-7542-4337-915A-D2BD6512C557</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - AirTran - Milwaukee-Cancun Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="airtran5812"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/airtranairways.html">AirTran Airways, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100146.html">OST-2010-0146</a> - Exemption - Milwaukee-Cancun</p>
                    <p>Filed May 3, 2012 | Issued May 8, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/331.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal of scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Cancun, Mexico.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.airtran.com/">http://www.airtran.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:08:30 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4C0412E9-049E-4A56-A7FD-D0CC272F2D3B</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Cherokee Air - Bahamas-US Passenger Charters</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="cherokee5812"></a><strong>Cherokee Air, Ltd.</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120062.html">OST-2012-0062</a> - Exemption - Bahamas-US Passenger Charters</p>
                    <p>Filed April 20, 2012 | Issued April 27, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/317.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Exemption under 49 USC &sect; 40109 to engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between a point or points in the Bahamas and a point or points in Florida, and other charters subject to Part 212 of the Department&rsquo;s Economic Regulations, using small aircraft.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Cherokee&rsquo;s previous permit and exemption authority lapsed when the applicant failed to seek timely renewal. See Dockets <a href="../ostdocket2001/ost019566.htm">OST-2001-9566</a> and <a href="../ostdocket2003/ost0314514.htm">OST-2003-14514</a>. Our approval of its present request does not serve to insulate the applicant from any enforcement action which may be taken by the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.cherokeeair.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.cherokeeair.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:07:39 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">EF98A952-3873-43F3-95AA-579F1F6E1853</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - LIAT - Intra-Caribbean and Intra-Caribbean-Miami Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="liat5812"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/liat.htm">LIAT (1974) Limited</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost983771.htm">OST-1998-3771</a> - Exemption - Puerto Rico and St. Vincent - Port-of-Spain - Dominicana</p>
<p>Filed April 5, 2012 | Issued May 8, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/332.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
<p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to engage in (1) scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between (a) the coterminal points Antigua and Barbuda, Montserrat, and St. Kitts and Nevis; via the intermediate points Anguilla, the British Virgin Islands, and St. Maarten; and the coterminal points St. Croix, St. Thomas, and San Juan, Puerto Rico; and beyond to Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic; (b) the coterminal points Antigua and Barbuda, and St. Kitts and Nevis, via the intermediate points St. Maarten and St. Lucia; and the terminal point Miami, Florida; (c) San Juan and St. Vincent, and beyond to Port of Spain, Trinidad; and (d) San Juan and Dominica; and (2) charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 212 of the Department&rsquo;s regulations. LIAT also requests amendment of that authority to conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail between San Juan, Puerto Rico and St. Vincent, and beyond to Bridgetown, Barbados. LIAT asks that this authority be granted for a period of two years.</p>
<p class="justified">LIAT sought authority for a two-year period. The one-year duration of the authority we granted is consistent with our usual policy of granting exemption authority in the circumstances presented. We, therefore, dismissed the application to the extent that it sought authority for a longer period.</p>
<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.liatairline.com/">http://www.liatairline.com/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:07:12 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">E915D373-7011-490A-94DF-D2E724B67444</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - WestJet - Canada-US Codesharing with Korean Air</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="westjet5812"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/westjetairlines.html">WestJet</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="ost050712.html#westjet5712">OST-2012-0066</a> - Statement of Authorization - Canada-US Codesharing with Korean Air Lines</p>
                    <p>Filed May 3, 2012 | Approved May 8, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/325.pdf">Department Action on Application</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Application of WestJet for a statement of authorization to permit WestJet to display the Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd  designator code (KE*) on WestJet operated flights between Los Angeles and Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton; between Las Vegas and Vancouver and Calgary; between San Francisco and Vancouver and Calgary; and between Honolulu and Vancouver, for the purpose of transporting passengers between Korea and North America. WestJet also requests a waiver of the 45-day advance filing requirement under 14 CFR Part 212.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Brett Kruger</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.westjet.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.westjet.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:06:44 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">CCD2EE32-35FB-4110-942D-CD3242D24ED2</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Submission of US Carrier and Airport Tarmac Delay Contingency Plans to DOT for Approval - Notice of Submission Details</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="tarmac5812"></a><strong>Submission of US Carrier and Airport Tarmac Delay Contingency Plans to Department of Transportation for Approval</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120028.html">OST-2012-0028</a></p>
                    <p>Issued May 2, 2012 | On File at Federal Register May 8, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/316.pdf">Notice of Submission Details</a></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/333.pdf">As Published in Federal Register May 9, 2012</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 requires covered US carriers and US airports to submit to the Secretary of Transportation for review and approval tarmac delay contingency plans on or before May 14, 2012. This document provides information on how covered US carriers and airports can submit the required plans to the US Department of Transportation&rsquo;s Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings through the World Wide Web, and addresses frequently asked questions about the applicability of the statutory provisions.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Carriers and airports are directed to the model contingency planning document, titled &ldquo;Development of Contingency Plans for Lengthy Airline On-Board Ground Delays,&rdquo; that was developed by the Department&rsquo;s National Task Force to Develop Model Contingency Plans to Deal with Lengthy Airline On-Board Ground Delays for contingency planning guidance. See Docket <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=DOT-OST-2007-0108-0124">OST-2007-0108-0124</a>. This document can also be found <a href="http://airconsumer.dot.gov/publications/TarmacTFModelContingencyPlanningDocument.pdf">here</a>. We also understand that Airports Council International &ndash; North America and the American Association of Airport Executives have developed a template that airports can use as a reference. Airports can contact those organizations for further information. The Airport Cooperative Research Program has developed some guidance materials in this area as well. Those materials can be found at <a href="http://www.trb.org/ACRP/Blurbs/166569.aspx">http://www.trb.org/ACRP/Blurbs/166569.aspx</a>. Due to the varying nature and requirements of each airport, however, DOT does not plan to publish a sample of an approved tarmac delay contingency plan. Covered airlines and airports are required to post a copy of their approved contingency plan on their website.</p>
<p>                    <p><em>By: Blane Workie</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:06:17 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">094431E0-F367-4102-9136-8DBA277FA9F4</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>WestJet - Canada-US Codesharing with Korean Air</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="westjet5712"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/westjetairlines.html">WestJet</a></strong></p>
				  <p>OST-2012-0066 - Statement of Authorization - Canada-US Codesharing with Korean Air Lines</p>
				  <p>May 3, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/291.pdf">Application for a Statement of Authorization</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">WestJet hereby applies for a statement of authorization to the extent necessary to enable it to display the Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd KE* code on flights operated by WestJet between certain points in Canada and certain points in the United States. Because WestJet and KAL intend to implement their codeshare arrangement on May 31, 2012, WestJet respectfully requests grant of this application on or before May 14, 2012 to provide sufficient time for advance marketing activities.} WestJet further requests that the statement of authorization be issued for an indefinite period.</p>
				  <p class="justified">WestJet and KAL have signed a codeshare agreement that provides for the KAL KE * code to be listed on various WestJet flights. Although most of the codeshared service will involve sectors within Canada, the agreement also provides for WestJet to list the KE * code on flights operated by WestJet between Los Angeles and Vancouver , Calgary and Edmonton; between Las Vegas and Vancouver and Calgary; between San Francisco and Vancouver and Calgary; and between Honolulu and Vancouver. As noted above, WestJet is requesting a statement of authorization to enable it to display the KE * code on these flights. The codeshare service is intended for passengers traveling between Korea and North America and will not be marketed to US-Canada local passengers.</p>
				  <p><em>Counsel: Garofalo Goerlich, Don Hainbach, 202-776-3970</em></p>
				  <blockquote>
<p>				    <p><a href="http://www.westjet.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.westjet.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:41:58 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">69348AEF-870C-41F9-94FD-F545FDD0780E</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Hagerstown, MD and Lancaster, PA - DOT Request for Community Comments</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="eashagerstown5712"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Hagerstown, Maryland and Lancaster, Pennsylvania</strong></p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0625228.html">OST-2006-25228</a> - Hagerstown<a href="../ost13/ost0625228.html"><br>
                    </a><a href="../ostdocket2002/ost0211450.htm">OST-2002-11450</a> - Lancaster</p>
				  <p>May 4, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/290.pdf"><strong>DOT</strong> Request for Community Comments</a>				  </p>
				  <p class="justified">Sun Air submitted an inseparable proposal for both communities utilizing nine passenger twin-engine Piper Chieftain aircraft with service to either Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport or Washington Dulles International Airport. At Hagerstown, the carrier would provide 24 nonstop round trips a week to BWI for an annual subsidy requirement of $1,724,486, or to lAD for $1,785,638. At Lancaster, the carrier proposed to provide 30 nonstop round trips a week to BWI for an annual subsidy rate of $2,350,403, or to lAD for $2,504,174. We note that Sun Air, a registered air taxi operator, does not currently have the requisite operating authorities from either the Department or the Federal Aviation Administration to provide scheduled passenger operations more than four round trips per week between two or more points according to a published schedule. While Sun Air has submitted an application for the necessary economic authority to allow it to engage in more than the four round trips per week as described above, that application is still pending before the Department.</p>
				  <p class="justified">We request that you submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but in any case no later than May 24, 2012.</p>
				  <p><em>By: DOT, Brian Swanson</em></p>
				  <blockquote>
				    <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flyhagerstown.com/">http://www.flyhagerstown.com/</a> - Hagerstown Regional Airport</font><br>
<p>				      <font size="-1"><a href="http://www.lancasterairport.com/">http://www.lancasterairport.com/</a> - Lancaster Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:41:34 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">A1BB07E9-6D4C-46C6-A516-CE77C2C36326</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Tupelo, MS - Mississippi Towns ad Cities in Support of Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="eastupelo5712"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Tupelo, Mississippi</strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090305.html">OST-2009-0305</a></p>
<p>Mississippi Towns and Cities in Support of <strong>Silver Airways</strong>:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="/ostpdf84/310.pdf"><strong>City of Amory</strong></a></li>
  <li><a href="/ostpdf84/306.pdf"><strong>City of Baldwyn</strong></a></li>
  <li><strong><a href="/ostpdf84/295.pdf">City of Booneville</a></strong></li>
  <li><strong><a href="/ostpdf84/311.pdf">City of Hernando</a></strong></li>
  <li><a href="/ostpdf84/313.pdf"><strong>City of Nettleton</strong></a></li>
  <li><a href="/ostpdf84/303.pdf"><strong>T</strong></a><a href="/ostpdf84/303.pdf"><strong>own of Ecru</strong></a></li>
  <li><strong><a href="/ostpdf84/301.pdf">Town of Golden</a></strong></li>
  <li><strong><a href="/ostpdf84/300.pdf">Town of Shuqualak</a></strong></li>
  <li><strong><a href="/ostpdf84/308.pdf">Town of Walls</a></strong></li>
  <li><a href="/ostpdf84/309.pdf"><strong>Town of Woodland</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flytupelo.com/">http://www.flytupelo.com/</a> - Tupelo Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:41:04 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">95EF62D9-2C7B-4804-B75B-0AC5A3C71119</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>PenAir - Family Assistance Plan</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="penair5712"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/peninsula.htm">Peninsula Airways d/b/a PenAir</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="../ostdocket/ost961960.htm">OST-1996-1960</a> - Family Assistance Plans</p>
<p>April 30, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/314.pdf">Family Assistance Plan</a></p>
<p><em>By: Brian Whilden</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><a href="http://www.penair.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.penair.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:40:36 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">D2E9B9BF-893F-4C7A-84EF-D38FCC5BA229</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Southern Air Charter - Additional Information (Bahamas-US Charter Renewal)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="southern5712"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/southernaircharter.html">Southern Air Charter Co., Ltd.</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100027.html">OST-2010-0027</a> - Exemption - Bahamas-US Charter Passenger</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>May 4, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/297.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption</a></p>
<blockquote>
  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/305.pdf" class="smalltext">Motion for Confidential Treatment</a></p>
</blockquote>
<br />
<p class="justified">Southern Air Charter Co. Ltd, respectfully request renewal of the above-captioned exemption form 49 USC &sect;41301, granted by the NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN dated May 17, 2010 and renewal by the NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN dated April 14, 2011, for an additional one-year period. The notice permits Southern Air Charter Co., LTD to engage in charter air transportation of persons, property and mail between the Bahamas and United States of America and other charters subject to Part 212 of the Department&rsquo;s rules, using small aircraft.</p>
<p><em>Counsel: McDonald Tinker, Kevin McMaster, 316-263-5851</em></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>May 7, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/307.pdf">Additional Information</a></p>
<ul>
  <li>Air Operator Certificate</li>
  <li>Certificate of Insurance</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Counsel: McDonald Tinker, Kevin McMaster, 316-263-5851</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.southernaircharter.com/">http://www.southernaircharter.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:40:10 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">ECE623CD-5C33-46EA-BC3B-E8AB06D96142</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>VIH Cougar Helicopters - Answer of Petroleum Helicopters, Northern Pioneers Helicopters and Soloy Helicopters to Objections of VIH Cougar Helicopters / Interim Update of VIH Cougar Helicopters</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="cougar5712"></a><strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc.</strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120022.html">OST-2012-0022</a> - Submission of Aviation Consumer Protection Division Webpage On-Line Aviation Complaint Form</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>May 4, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/297.pdf">Answer of <strong>Petroleum Helicopters</strong>, <strong>Northern Pioneers Helicopters</strong> and <strong>Soloy Helicopters</strong> to Objections of VIH Cougar Helicopters</a></p>
<blockquote>
  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/320.pdf" class="smalltext">Motion for Confidential Treatment</a></p>
</blockquote>
<br />
<p class="justified">VIR Cougar's own filings make abundantly clear that it is nothing more than a shell company erected to provide an illusion of US control for the purpose of allowing a Canadian helicopter carrier to operate in the United States in violation of federal law. The owner and chief executive of VIR Cougar is a practicing lawyer based in British Columbia with no prior background in helicopter operations whose longtime Canadian client effectively gifted him a 76% ownership stake in a US helicopter company and appointed him the President, his sole qualification to run such a company being that he is a US citizen. With its figurehead in place, the Canadian company then installed its own General Manager - a Canadian citizen - to run the daily operations of the purported US citizen entity while simultaneously managing all other US operations of his non-citizen air carrier employer, a blatant provocation which occurred even as the Department investigated its suspicions of foreign control. After years of denials, obfuscation and unfulfilled promises to rectify its unlawful operating structure, VIR Cougar's masquerade as a US citizen air carrier must come to an end. Its flagrant contempt for US law, refusal to answer probative questions asked by the Department, and pervasive discrepancies in its US corporate filings call for a swift and decisive remedy: immediate revocation of its operating authority and the imposition of civil penalties.</p>
<p><em>Counsel: K&amp;L Gates, Jonathan Blank</em></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>May 2, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/299.pdf">Interim Update of <strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters</strong></a></p>
<blockquote>
  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/321.pdf" class="smalltext">Motion for Confidential Treatment</a></p>
</blockquote>
<br />
<p class="justified">With the wind up ofVIH Cougar's VFR seismic and mining exploration business and Purchaser transaction completed, we have implemented much of the reorganization efforts addressed in our prior filings. VIH Cougar's efforts demonstrate that it has voluntarily taken remedial action and is fully committed to addressing the Department's concerns, in an orderly manner while responsibly addressing the interests of its employees, the FAA, and customers (which have included a US government body) and discharging our primary commitment to continuing airworthiness and operational safety.</p>
<p class="justified">Given the significant progress that has been made to date, and the fact that the contemplated IFR reorganization plans will address all remaining DOT concerns, we respectfully submit that, pursuant to our April 2, 2012 Motion to Stay, it would be in the best interests of the Department, VIH Cougar, and the public to hold the show cause proceedings in abeyance pending VIH Cougar's completion of its IFR reorganization.</p>
<p><p><em>Counsel: Dickstein Shapiro, David Nadler, 202-420-2281</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:39:25 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">C4799EF3-9ED1-45EC-8F1C-E4AEA61C45F2</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Aerolineas Regionales - Mexico-US Cargo Charters Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="regionales5712"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aerolineasregionales.html">Aerolineas Regionales, S.A. de C.V.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080386.html">OST-2008-0386</a> - Exemption - Mexico-US Cargo Charters</p>
                    <p>Filed April 18, 2012 | Issued May 7, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/312.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect; 41301 to permit the applicant to conduct charter foreign air transportation of property between points in Mexico and points in the United States, and other cargo charters in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212.                    </p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.regionalcargo.com.mx/">http://www.regionalcargo.com.mx/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:38:04 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">DFB2D51C-F0D8-4E04-81AD-00ACD7670321</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Biman Bangladesh - Bangladesh-New York/Newark Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="biman5712"></a><b><a href="../ostcarrier/biman.htm">Biman Bangladesh Airlines</a></b></p>
<p><font size="3"><a href="/ostdocket/ost95488.htm">OST-1995-488</a></font> - Exemption - Bangladesh-New York/Newark</p>
<p>Filed April 6, 2012 | Issued May 7, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/315.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
<p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to conduct: 1) scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Dhaka, Bangladesh and New York/Newark, via the intermediate points Delhi, Dubai, Amsterdam, Brussels and Manchester; and 2) charters pursuant to 14 CFR Part 212 of the Department&rsquo;s regulations. The applicant states that it will operate its services exclusively pursuant to a wet lease arrangement with a duly authorized and properly supervised US or foreign air carrier.</p>
<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.biman-airlines.com/">http://www.biman-airlines.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:37:34 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">8C6DB7FF-7FC9-4B4D-91B0-CF1367EF14FB</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AirTran - Milwaukee-Cancun Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="airtran5312"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/airtranairways.html">AirTran Airways, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100146.html">OST-2010-0146</a> - Exemption - Milwaukee-Cancun</p>
                    <p>May 3, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/280.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">AirTran hereby applies for renewal of exemption authority to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Cancun, Mexico. The Department of Transportation originally awarded this exemption authority to AirTran by Notice of Action Taken on June 23, 2010 in this Docket. The current exemption is scheduled to expire on June 23, 2012. To ensure no interruption of scheduled service, AirTran respectfully requests prompt renewal of its exemption authority for a minimum of two years.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Southwest, Robert Kneisley, 202-263--6284</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.airtran.com/">http://www.airtran.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:15:45 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">C1A92B9C-B6F3-4A3E-96EE-F986558DED22</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Delta - US-China Start-Up Extension and Route Flexibility (Tokyo-Guangzhou) - Seven Frequencies / Return of Seven Frequencies (Atlanta-Shanghai)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="../ostcarrier/deltafilings.html">Delta Air Lines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                  <p>&nbsp;</p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2010/ost20100285.html">OST-2010-0285</a> - Detroit-Beijing; Tokyo (Narita)-Guangzhou</p>
                    <p>May 3, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="../ostpdf84/285.pdf">Motion for Start-Up Date Extension and Route Flexibility</a> - <span class="smalltext">7 US-China Frequencies</span></p>
                  <p>Delta hereby respectfully requests an extension of the start-up date with respect to seven (7) U.S.-China frequencies originally allocated in this docket for Tokyo-Guangzhou service from June 1, 2012 to June 1, 2013. Delta further requests the flexibility to use these seven frequencies on any U.S.-China route where<br>
                  Delta holds underlying route authority.</p>
                  <p>There is a large surplus of U.S.-China combination frequencies. Contemporaneous with this motion, Delta is filing a letter with the Department returning seven additional frequencies previously allocated for Atlanta-Shanghai service. With thereturn of these frequencies, there will be 37 combination frequencies available in the unallocated pool.</p>
                  <p>Grant of this request for a start-up extension and route flexibility is in the public interest. Developing and expanding Delta&rsquo;s international route network is a cornerstone of Delta&rsquo;s business strategy, and China is one of world&rsquo;s most important international markets. However, in the face of challenging economic conditions, Delta does not plan to commence Tokyo-Guangzhou service in 2012. Grant of the requested start-up date extension and route flexibility will permit Delta to introduce additional China service as soon as market conditions permit. Grant of the requested relief will not prejudice any other U.S. carrier because, as noted, there will be 37 frequencies available in the unallocated pool.</p>
                  <p><em>Counsel: Delta, Alexander Van der Bellen, 202-842-4184</em></p>
                  <p>&nbsp;</p>
                  <p><a href="../ostdocket2007/ost0728567.html">OST-2007-28567</a> - 2007/2008/2009 US-China Air Services and Combination Frequency Allocation Proceeding</p>
                  <p>May 3, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="../ostpdf84/286.pdf">Re: China Frequency Return Notice</a></p>
                  <p>Delta hereby returns to the Department the seven (7) U.S.-China frequencies granted by <a href="../ostdocket2007/order070925.html">Order 2007-9-25</a> in Docket <a href="../ostdocket2007/ost0728567.html">DOT-OST-2007-28567</a> (formerly used for Atlanta-Shanghai service). Delta continues to hold 40 U.S.-China frequencies.</p>
<p>                  <p><em>Counsel: Delta, Alexander Van der Bellen, 202-842-4184</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:15:21 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">36034F5C-ECE2-416E-A9AE-1D600A1369B0</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - ABSA - Brazil-US Cargo Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aerolinhas5312"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/absa.html">Aerolinhas Brasileiras, S.A.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket/ost961372.htm">OST-1996-1372</a> - Exemption - Brazil-Miami/Amsterdam All-Cargo</p>
                    <p>Filed April 11, 2012 | Issued May 3, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/284.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renew exemption from 49 USC &sect; 41301 to engage in (1) scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail from any point or points behind Brazil, via Brazil and intermediate points, to any point or points in the United States and beyond; (2) charter foreign air transportation of property and mail from any point or points behind Brazil, via Brazil and intermediate points, to any point or points in the United States and beyond; and (3) other charters in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.absacargo.com.br/">http://www.absacargo.com.br/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:14:52 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3CA0F18C-ECAB-4B38-9D90-A260C188C6EE</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Alaska Airlines - Los Angeles-Loreto Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="alaska5312"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/alaskaairlines.html">Alaska Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2004/ost0419419.html">OST-2004-19419 </a>- Exemption - Los Angeles-Loreto</p>
                    <p>Filed March 29, 2012 | Issued May 2, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/278.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal of scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Los Angeles, California and Loreto, Mexico.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Alaska states that it currently serves the subject market on a codeshare basis only, by placing its code on the Los Angeles-Loreto flights of Horizon Air Industries, Inc.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.alaskaair.com/"><font size="-1">http://www.alaskaair.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:13:48 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">C0658E07-82D4-4CFF-BD9A-51B88E2C4CDB</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Delta, KLM and SkyWest - Expansion of Codesharing</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="deltaetc5312"></a><strong>Delta Air Lines, Inc., KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and SkyWest Airlines, Inc.</strong></p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket2004/ost0419214.html">OST-2004-19214</a></p>
				  <p>Filed April 18, 2012 | Approved May 2, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/275.pdf">Department Action on Application</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">Joint application of Delta Air Lines, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and SkyWest Airlines, Inc. for a blanket statement of authorization permitting SkyWest to display KLM's &quot;KL*&quot; designator code on Delta Connection flights SkyWest operates: a) within the United States (in conjunction with KLM's services in foreign air transportation), and b) between the United States and third countries.</p>
				  <p class="justified">The Applicant also requests waiver of the 45-day advance filing requirement under 14 CFR Part 212.</p>
				  <blockquote>
				    <p class="justified">We grant the Joint Applicants' request to allow the KLM codesharing on SkyWest to be administered jointly with the existing Delta/KLM blanket statements of authorization for KLM codesharing on Delta and other Delta Connection carriers in this docket. such that any non-Mexico. non-open-skies point 30-day notice given by Delta. KLM or any of the Delta Connection regional partners or code-share affiliates authorized in this docket be deemed notice given by all the carriers. and to incorporate by reference all such prior notices. The Joint Applicants further note that 30-day notice for all US-EU and open-skies markets was given on February 24, 2009 in this docket and incorporate that notice by reference as well.</p>
<p>			      </blockquote>
<br />				  <p><em>By: Shelita Johnson</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:13:10 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">9110A84E-391D-4F03-BA8B-9EC6B6CAE4A9</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - MAS de Carga - Mexico-US Scheduled All-Cargo Amendment</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="carga5312"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aerotransportesmasdecarga.html">Aerotransportes MAS de Carga, S.A. de C.V.</a></strong> &nbsp;</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket/ost961249.htm">OST-1996-1249</a> - Mexico-US Scheduled All-Cargo</p>
                    <p>Filed March 16, 2012 | Amended April 11, 2012 | Issued May 2, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/274.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to conduct:</p>
                    <ul>
                      <li class="justified">scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between: 1) Cancun, Mexico and Miami, Florida; 2) Mexico City, Mexico and Miami, Florida; 3) Mexico City, Mexico and Los Angeles, California; 4) Guadalajara, Mexico and Miami, Florida; 5) Merida, Mexico and Miami, Florida; and 6) Merida, Mexico and New York, New York;</li>
                      <li class="justified">scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between Mexico City, Mexico and Atlanta, Georgia, and to serve Miami and Atlanta on a coterminal basis; and</li>
                      <li class="justified">all-cargo charters between Mexico and the United States, and other all-cargo charters in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212.</li>
                  </ul>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch </em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.masair.com/">http://www.masair.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:12:00 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1D26E4AB-7C3B-4588-80DF-B4F75DCA1990</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Air India - Consent Order (Tarmac Delay Contingency and Customer Service Plans)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="airindia5312"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/airindia.html">Air India, Limited</a></strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-5-4<br>
			        <a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120002.html">OST-2012-0002</a> - Violations of 49 USC &sect; 41712 and 14 CFR 259.6 and 399.85(d)</p>
					<p>Issued and Served May 3, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/276.pdf">Consent Order</a></p>
					<p class="justified">This consent order concerns violations by Air India, Limited of 14 CFR Parts 259 and 399 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices and unfair methods of competition, 49 USC &sect; 41712. It directs Air India to cease and desist from future violations of those regulations and section 41712 and assesses the carrier a compromise civil penalty of $80,000.</p>
					<p class="justified">Air India is a foreign air carrier holding economic authority pursuant to 49 USC &sect; 41301 that operates scheduled passenger service to and from the United States using aircraft with a design capacity of 30 or more passenger seats. The carrier also has a website marketed to US consumers. As such, Air India is a covered carrier subject to the requirements of 14 CFR Part 259 pertaining to the posting of tarmac delay contingency and customer service plans, and it is also subject to the optional fee notice requirement of 14 CFR 399.85(d). Nevertheless, Air India failed to post its tarmac delay contingency and customer service plans on its website by August 23, 2011, as required. Additionally, Air India failed to place by August 23, 2011, a clear and conspicuous hyperlink on its website homepage that directly links to a page or a place on a page where all optional services and related fees are disclosed.</p>
					<p><em>By: Rosalind Knapp</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="/ostpdf84/279.pdf">Air India Fined for Violation of New Airline Consumer Rule</a> - DOT Press Release - May 3, 2012</p>
<p>					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.airindia.in/">http://www.airindia.in/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:11:32 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">FD212A20-0D71-4216-A208-59C72452B3C3</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>LAN Airlines - Chile-US Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="lan5212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/lanairlines.html">LAN Airlines S.A.</a></strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost996493.htm">OST-1999-6493</a> - Exemption - Chile-US</p>
					<p>May 1, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/261.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption</a></p>
					<p class="justified">LAN hereby applies for renewal of its exemption from 49 USC &sect; 41301 to engage in:</p>
					<ul>
					  <li class="justified">the scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail from points behind Chile via Chile and intermediate points to a point or points in the United States and beyond; and</li>
					  <li class="justified"> the scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between the United States and any point or points.</li>
				  </ul>
					<p class="justified">On May 13, 2010, the Department of Transportation issued a renewal of the Notice of Action under <a href="/ostdocket/ost996493.htm">OST-1999-6493</a>, approving this exemption authority. This exemption authority was issued for two years and is currently set to expire on May 13, 2012.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: LAN, Juan Carlos Mencio, 786-265-6091</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.lan.com/">http://www.lan.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:35:40 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">B1A2B93F-B00B-4E53-9618-860DBA128C89</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>LAN Argentina - Argentina-US Renewal / US-Argentina Reciprocal Codesharing with American Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="lanarg5212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/lanargentina.html">Lan Argentina S.A.</a></strong></p>
					<p><br>
					</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0522140.html">OST-2005-22140</a> - Exemption - Argentina-US Scheduled/Charter Passenger</p>
                    <p>May 2, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf85/268.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">LAN Argentina S.A. hereby requests renewal of exemption in the captioned docket permitting it to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between any point or points in Argentina and Miami, Florida, via the intermediate point Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. LAN Argentina&rsquo;s existing exemption will expire on June 10, 2012. LAN Argentina requests renewal of this exemption for a one-year period.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Squire Sanders, Marshall Sinick, 202-626-6651</em></p>
                    <p><br>
                    </p>
                    <p><a href="ost070034.html">OST-2007-0034</a> - US-Argentina Reciprocal Codesharing with American Airlines</p>
                    <p>May 2, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/267.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">LAN Argentina hereby applies for renewal of its exemption to engage in:</p>
                    <ul>
                      <li class="justified">scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in Argentina and fourteen points in the United States, and beyond to three points in Canada , four points in Asia (except Japan, China and the Philippines), eight points in Europe, four points in Mexico, and points in the Caribbean, Central America, and South America;</li>
                      <li class="justified">scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in Argentina and five additional points in the United States on a codeshare basis only;</li>
                      <li class="justified">scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in Argentina and five additional points in the United States on a codeshare basis only, in conjunction with a designated airline for the United States.</li>
                    </ul>
                    <p class="justified">LAN Argentina requests renewal of its exemption for a one-year period on its existing terms and conditions.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Squire Sanders, Marshall Sinick, 202-626-6651</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.lan.com/">http://www.lan.com/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:35:15 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">63CA1CF6-F58A-463C-8C90-F69D0F01311C</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Beckley, WV - Raleigh County Memorial Airport in Support of Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easbeckley5212"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Beckley, West Virginia</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost972761.htm">OST-1997-2761</a></p>
					<p>April 17,	2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/270.pdf">Raleight County Memorial Airport in Support of <strong>Silver Airways</strong></a></p>
					<p class="justified">Reference to the Essential Air Service Docket <a href="/ostdocket/ost972761.htm">OST-1997-2761</a>, final comment period, the Raleigh County Memorial Airport Authority has unanimously chosen the proposal offered by Silver Airways, with 26 weekly frequencies or two weekday roundtrips one of which would operate on a (one) one-stop basis, and one non stop. With approval, three total week-end operations under a codeshare with United Airlines, service to Washington DC Dulles Airport. The service will utilize a Saab-340 thirty-four passenger cabin class aircraft.</p>
					<p><em>By: Tom Cochran</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flybeckley.com/">http://www.flybeckley.com/</a> - Raleigh County Memorial Airport</font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:34:38 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">0FF715F3-5C40-48ED-9BFB-225968387AA5</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Hagerstown, MD and Lancaster, PA - Proposal of Sun Air Int'l</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="eashagerstown5212"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Hagerstown, Maryland and Lancaster, Pennsylvania</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0625228.html">OST-2006-25228</a> - Hagerstown<a href="../ost13/ost0625228.html"><br>
                    </a><a href="../ostdocket2002/ost0211450.htm">OST-2002-11450</a> - Lancaster</p>
					<p>April 26, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/272.pdf">Proposal of <strong>Sun Air International</strong></a></p>
					<p class="justified">Sun Air is providing the communities with two options for service: Option 1 provides flights to Baltimore-Washington Airport, and Option 2 would provide flights to Washington-Dulles Airport. Both Service Option I and Service Option 2 are for operating to both Lancaster and Hagerstown. The bid proposal is for both markets only, inseparable. Sun Air believes that this is necessary to cover the relatively high fixed costs from establishing a regional base.</p>
					<p class="justified">Both Service Options provide for five weekday round trip flights from Lancaster, and four weekday round trip flights from Hagerstown. Two round trip flights from each airport would be operated on Saturdays, and two round trip flights would be operated from Hagerstown on Sundays. Lancaster would operate three round trip flights on Sundays.</p>
					<p class="justified">Sun Air's proposed operations will be operated with nine-passenger twin-engine Piper Chieftain aircraft.</p>
					<p><em>By: Thomas Cooper</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="smalltext"><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flyhagerstown.com/">http://www.flyhagerstown.com/</a> - Hagerstown Regional Airport</font><br>
<p>					    <a href="http://www.lancasterairport.com/">http://www.lancasterairport.com/</a> - Lancaster Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:34:11 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">44023A99-D348-43AB-9DD7-AFED138B07F9</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Tupelo, MS - City of Fulton in Support of Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="eastupelo5212"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Tupelo, Mississippi</strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090305.html">OST-2009-0305</a></p>
<p>April 26, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/273.pdf">City of Fulton in Support of <strong>Silver Airways</strong></a></p>
<p class="justified">I am writing in support of Silver Airways' proposal to provide commercial air service to Tupelo Regional Airport. Citizens from Fulton depend on the Tupelo Regional Airport for their air service. It is very important to our local economy for air service to continue in and out of Tupelo. We believe Silver Airways' interline ticketing and baggage agreements with Delta Airlines make this option very attractive to our citizens. In &middot;addition the 30 to 50 seat aircraft are much more desirable that the 8 seat aircraft offered by Air Choice One. We are excited about this chance to return to profitability. Thank you for considering our citizens in your deliberations.</p>
<p><em>By: Mayor Paul Walker</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flytupelo.com/">http://www.flytupelo.com/</a> - Tupelo Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:33:45 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">05EAAC78-D57B-4A3E-B76D-635E76401BF6</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Jeju Air - Korea-US Clarification</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="jeju5212"></a><a href="../ostcarrier/jejuair.html"><strong>Jeju Air Co., Ltd.</strong></a></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120050.html">OST-2012-0050</a> - Exemption and Foreign Air Carrier Permit - Korea-US</p>
                    <p>April 20, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/262.pdf">Clarification</a></p>
                    <p>We confirm that Jeju seeks  Korea-US charter authority.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Pillsbury Winthrop, Josh Romanow</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://en.jejuair.net/" class="smalltext">http://en.jejuair.net/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:33:15 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">DCFC0943-B17D-4134-9AF7-47E6BB562739</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Atlantic Southeast - Consent Order (Discrimination Compliance)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="asa5212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/atlanticsoutheast.htm">Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-5-2<br>
			        <a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120002.html">OST-2012-0002</a> - Compliance with 49 USC &sect;&sect; 40127(a), 41702, 41310 and 41712</p>
					<p>Issued and Served May 2, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/266.pdf">Consent Order</a></p>
					<p class="justified">This order concerns violations by Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. of the Federal statutes prohibiting US and foreign air carriers from subjecting any air traveler to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex or ancestry. The order directs Atlantic Southeast to cease and desist from future violations and assesses the carrier $25,000 in civil penalties.</p>
					<p class="justified">The Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings investigated Atlantic Southeast Airline&rsquo;s compliance with the above-cited statutory prohibitions following allegations that two religious leaders (Imams) were removed and denied re-boarding on flight 5452, operated as a Delta Connection flight by Atlantic Southeast, at the Memphis International Airport on May 6, 2011, because their previous removal from the aircraft by Delta security officials and the search of the passengers&rsquo; seating areas by law enforcement officials resulted in passenger concern and unrest. While the Enforcement Office finds that the initial decision to remove the Imams from Atlantic Southeast flight 5452 to conduct secondary screening was not discriminatory, the evidence in the Enforcement Office&rsquo;s view disclosed that Atlantic Southeast violated the law when it failed to re-board the passengers on flight 5452 after law enforcement officials and its mainline carrier partner&rsquo;s security officials determined that they were not a security threat and cleared them for travel. Once an individual who has been removed from an aircraft because of security concerns has been found to not be a security threat, the carrier must allow that individual to re-board the same aircraft and take his/her flight so long as the aircraft has not yet departed unless a valid safety or security concern exists. The Enforcement Office believes that the removed individuals should have been re-boarded in this case.</p>
					<p><em>By: Rosalind Knapp</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://flyasa.com/http://flyasa.com/" class="smalltext">http://flyasa.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:32:45 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">C6E37159-8457-433B-97E8-9F4A48ACF52F</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Muscle Shoals/Florence/Sheffield/Tuscumbia, AL, Alpena, Escanaba and Iron Mountain/Kingsford, MI, Bemidji, Brainerd, International Falls and Thief River Falls, MN, Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, MS and Aberdeen, SD - Extending Service Obligation</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easmuscle5212"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Muscle Shoals/Florence/Sheffield/Tuscumbia, Alabama, Alpena, Escanaba and Iron Mountain/Kingsford, Michigan, Bemidji, Brainerd, International Falls and Thief River Falls, Minnesota, Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, Mississippi and Aberdeen, South Dakota</strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-5-5<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket/ost007856.htm">OST-2000-7856</a> - Muscle Shoals, AL<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090300.html">OST-2009-0300</a> - Alpena, MI                     <br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0315128.html">OST-2003-15128</a> - Escanaba, MI<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket/ost995175.htm">OST-1999-5175</a> - Iron Mountain/Kingsford, MI<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110134.html">OST-2011-0134</a> - Bemidji, MN<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110135.html">OST-2011-0135</a> - Brainerd, MN<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090304.html">OST-2009-0304</a> - International Falls, MN<br>
                      <a href="../ostdocket2001/ost0110642.htm">OST-2001-10642</a> - Thief River Falls, MN<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080209.html">OST-2008-0209</a> - Greenville, MS<br>
                      <a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2001/ost0110685.htm">OST-2001-10685</a> - Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090305.html">OST-2009-0305</a> - Tupelo, MS<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110137.html">OST-2011-0137</a> - Aberdeen, SD</p>
					<p>Issued and Served May 2, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/271.pdf">Order Extending Service Obligation</a></p>
					<p class="justified">By this Order, we extend the Essential Air Service obligation of the two wholly owned subsidiaries of Pinnacle Airlines Corporation -- Mesaba Aviation, Inc.  and Pinnacle Airlines d/b/a Delta Connection at the 12 communities listed below for 30 days, through, June 9, 2012.</p>
					<p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p><font size="-1"><span class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.flytheshoals.com/">http://www.flytheshoals.com/</a> - Northwest Alabama Regional Airport</span><br>
					    <a href="http://www.alpenaairport.com/">http://www.alpenaairport.com/</a> - Alpena County Regional Airport				    <br>
					    <a href="http://www.deltacountymi.org/airport.php/">http://www.deltacountymi.org/airport.php/</a> - Delta County Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.fordairport.org">http://www.fordairport.org</a> - Ford Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.bemidjiairport.org/">http://www.bemidjiairport.org/</a> - Bemidji Regional Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://brainerd.com/airport/">http://brainerd.com/airport/</a> - Brainerd Lakes Regional Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.rangeregionalairport.com/">http://www.rangeregionalairport.com/</a> - Range Regional Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.internationalfallsairport.com/">http://www.internationalfallsairport.com/</a> - International Falls International Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.citytrf.net/transportation.htm">http://www.citytrf.net/transportation.htm</a> - Thief River Falls Regional Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.greenville.ms.us/Airport.html">http://www.greenville.ms.us/Airport.html</a> - Mid-Delta Regional Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.hlrairport.com/">http://www.hlrairport.com/</a> - Hattiesburg/Laurel Regional Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.flytupelo.com/">http://www.flytupelo.com/</a> - Tupelo Regional Airport<br>
<p>				      <a href="http://www.aberdeen.sd.us/index.aspx?nid=76">http://www.aberdeen.sd.us/index.aspx?nid=76</a> - Aberdeen Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:32:19 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3DCF09E2-C7C6-4048-B17F-00CAE7211E2D</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Rhinelander, WI - Extending Service Obligation</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easrhine5212"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Rhinelander, Wisconsin</strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-5-3<a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110109.html"><br>
                    OST-2011-0109</a></p>
                    <p>Issued and Served May 2, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/265.pdf">Order Extending Service Obligation</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">By this Order, the Department of Transportation extends the Essential Air Service obligation of Chautauqua Airlines, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Republic Airways Holdings and doing business as Frontier Airlines at Rhinelander, Wisconsin, for an additional 30 days, through June 9, 2012.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Susan Kurland</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.fly-rhi.org/"><font size="-1">http://www.fly-rhi.org/</font></a><span class="smalltext"> - Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport</span></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:31:44 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1422F139-5471-4AB7-B12F-1B4B090B9CE9</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Island Airlines - Registration of Trade Name (Ocean Wings Air Charter)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="islandairlines5212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/islandairlines.html">Island Airlines, LLC</a></strong></p>
<p>Served May 2, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/269.pdf">Notice of Registration of Trade Name</a></p>
<p class="justified">On April 27, 2012, Island Airlines, LLC, a US commuter air carrier, requested that the Department register the trade name &ldquo;Ocean Wings Air Charter&rdquo; for use in certain of its operations.</p>
<p class="justified">Part 215  of the Department&rsquo;s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states that the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air carriers of the proposed use of the name.</p>
<p class="justified">In support of its request, IA states that Coastal Wings, Inc. d/b/a Ocean Wings, an air taxi operator in Massachusetts, has given IA permission to use the requested trade name, and has voluntarily surrendered its Part 135 operating certificate issued by the Federal Aviation Administration.</p>
<p class="justified">Since IA has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the trade name &ldquo;Ocean Wings Air Charter&rdquo; for use by IA.</p>
<p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.flyoceanwings.com/">http://www.flyoceanwings.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:31:07 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">992D4374-042C-42F4-8033-C0D489133E33</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Aerolineas Santo Domingo - Dominican Republic-US Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aerolineas5112"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aerolineassantodomingo.htm">Aerolineas Santo Domingo, S.A.</a></strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost006796.htm">OST-2000-6796</a> - Exemption - Dominican Republic-US Scheduled Passenger</p>
					<p>April 30, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/254.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption and for Foreign Air Carrier Permit</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Aerolineas Santo Domingo, S.A. hereby applies to the Department of Transportation for renewal of its exemption from Section 40109 of the same title, and for a foreign air carrier permit, to conduct On demand and scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between the Dominican Republic and United States. ASD requests renewal and amending of the exemption for a period of not less than two years. The existing exemption expired on June 27, 2012.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Luis Irizarry, 787-752-7621</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.airsantodomingo.com.do/"><font size="-1">http://www.airsantodomingo.com.do/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:05:00 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">ACB7AB3C-D7A4-4224-A0BA-28A7CE047D84</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Michael and Elena Gurevich v CAI - Reply to Answer of Alitalia</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="caicomplaint5112"></a><strong>Michael &amp; Elena Gurevich v Compagnia Aereas Italiana S.p.A.</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120040.html">OST-2012-0040</a></p>
                    <p>April 30, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/253.pdf">Petitioners' Motion to File a Reply and Reply to Answer of <strong>Alitalia</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Although replies are normally not authorized, leave should be granted in this instance for the following reasons. One, Alitalia&rsquo;s Answer raises numerous factual and legal issues that require response and clarification as to the underlying law, the controlling regulations, the related civil action, the applicability of EU 261 and the construction of Alitalia&rsquo;s tariff provisions. Two, although Alitalia admits to the alleged deception and to failing to comply with the relevant regulations, Alitalia attempts to excuse its violations as &ldquo;technicalities.&rdquo; This &ldquo;technicality&rdquo; argument requires a reply. Three, Alitalia has revised its General Conditions of Carriage since the filing of the Complaint.</p>
                    <p class="justified">In what it calls a &ldquo;stopgap&rdquo; measure, Alitalia attempts to retroactively alter passenger contracts entered into over the last three years by adding new language to its GCC shortly before it filed its Answer. Alitalia cannot retroactively alter the terms of transportation contracts for completed flights. Regardless, moving forward, Alitalia&rsquo;s &ldquo;stopgap&rdquo; measure highlights how Alitalia is seeking to benefit from the confusion by picking and choosing when to adhere to its passenger contract. Alitalia&rsquo;s &ldquo;stopgap&rdquo; language also highlights that the only reasonable interpretation of its tariff Rule 55 is that the passenger ticket (and the GCC incorporated by reference) sets forth the transportation contract.</p>
<p>                    <p><em>Counsel: Carney Williams, Hank Bates, 501-312-8500</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:04:08 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">38A6AC42-167F-46F4-893D-BFB701F8A2A5</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>PSA Airlines - Clarification of d/b/a (US-Turks &amp; Caicos)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="psa5112"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/psaairlines.htm">PSA Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2004/ost0418811.html">OST-2004-18811</a> - Exemption - US-Turks &amp; Caicos</p>
<p>April 17, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/259.pdf">Confirmation of d/b/a</a></p>
<p class="justified">This email will confirm that the services being applied for by PSA Airlines, Inc. in its Application for Renewal of an Exemption, in the above-referenced docket, will all be conducted doing business as US Airways Express.</p>
<p><em>Counsel: US Airways, Ben Slocum, 202-326-5154</em></p>
<blockquote>
  <p class="smalltext"><a href="ost042012.html#psa42012">Notice of Action Taken</a> - April 20, 2012</p>
<p>  <p class="smalltext"><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.psaairlines.com/">http://www.psaairlines.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:03:41 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">A89D56FE-2AFC-485D-8133-5FDEF3FF7EFE</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reciprocity Confirmations - Confirmation of Canadian Transportation Agency</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="reciprocity5112"></a><strong>Reciprocity Confirmations</strong></p>
<p><a href="../ostdocket2006/ost0624269.html">OST-2006-24269</a></p>
<p>May 1, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/260.pdf">Confirmation of <strong>Canadian Transportation Agency</strong></a></p>
<p class="justified">This letter confirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applications by United States air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada, including charters between Canada and third countries, in accordance with the provisions of the Air Transport Agreement Between Canada and the United States of America, signed March 12, 2007. In addition, as established in the Agreement, charter services not specified in the Annex to that Agreement, are considered on the basis of comity and reciprocity.</p>
<p><em>By: Catherine MacDonald</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><a href="http://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/air" class="smalltext">http://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/air</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:03:13 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">62B5D0B0-90BD-4A51-AA1B-59FF91379FD2</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Spirit Airlines - Motion for Extension of Start-Up Date (Fort Lauderdale-Bogotá)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="spirit5112"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/spiritairlines.html">Spirit Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110175.html">OST-2011-0175</a> - US-Colombia Frequency Allocation - Fort Lauderdale-Bogot&aacute;</p>
                    <p>April 27, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/250.pdf">Motion for Extension of Start-Up Date</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">On September 15, 2011, Spirit Airlines, Inc. filed an application for fourteen US-Colombia frequencies and exemption authority to provide service between Fort Lauderdale, Florida and Bogot&aacute;, Colombia and beyond to points in Ecuador and Lima, Peru. By Notice of Action Taken, in this docket, dated October 4, 2011, the Department granted Spirit this authority. The NOAT specified that Spirit would be required to inaugurate service between Fort Lauderdale and Bogot&aacute; within ten days of April 1, 2012. On January 30, 2012, Spirit filed a motion to extend the start-up date on seven of the awarded frequencies until May 24, 2012 and released the remaining seven frequencies. This motion was granted by the Department on February 10, 2012.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Spirit respectfully requests an additional extension of the start-up date until September 1, 2012. Spirit has obtained all necessary route authority from Peru and Columbia, but has not been able to obtain the necessary slot allocations at Bogot&aacute; to operate the flights. The extension is necessary to allow additional time to obtain these slots.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Grant of this motion will not adversely affect service in the FLL-BOG market and will not result in injury to any competitor or potential competitor. Twenty-eight frequencies remain open to potential competitors in this market.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Kirstein &amp; Young, Joanne Young, 202-331-3348</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.spirit.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.spirit.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:59:22 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">52E1C521-2AB2-44B4-A1B0-0F870D726D8D</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Yakutia - Request for Issuance of Exemption and Statement of Authorization</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="yakutia5112"></a><strong>Joint Stock Company Aircompany &quot;Yakutia&quot;</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120047.html">OST-2012-0047</a> - Exemption and Foreign Air Carrier Permit - Russia-Alaska<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120048.html">OST-2012-0048</a> - Statement of Authorization - Petropavlovsk/Kamchatsky-Anchorage Codesharing with Vladivostock Air</p>
					<p>April 27, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/252.pdf">Request of <strong>Yakutia</strong> for Issuance of Exemption and Statement of Authorization</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Enclosed is a letter from the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation advising the Department of Transportation that it plans to designate Joint Stock Company &quot;Yakutia&quot; to operate between Anchorage and Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to carry passengers, cargo and mail, and that an official diplomatic note will be forwarded to DOT through diplomatic channels. In light of this communication from the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation, Yakutia respectfully requests that the Department promptly issue an Exemption and Foreign Air Carrier Permit and a Statement of Authorization, as requested in the above-captioned DOT Dockets, so that Yakutia can begin selling tickets as soon as possible, in advance of the proposed start date of July 12, 2012.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Hogan Lovells, Sheryl Israel, 202-637-8898</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.yakutia.aero/" class="smalltext">http://www.yakutia.aero/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:58:38 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">21018C9D-3657-448A-A7CC-0BF28E73E295</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - TAM - Brazil-US Renewal and Amendment</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="tam5112"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/tamlinhas.htm">TAM-Linhas Aereas S.A.</a></strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost972421.htm">OST-1997-2421</a> - Exemption - Brazil-US Scheduled Passenger</p>
					<p>Filed August 10, 2001 | Amended April 11, 2012 | Issued April 27, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/249.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Renewal and amendment of exemption under 49 USC &sect; 40109 to permit TAM to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail from any point or points behind Brazil, via Brazil and intermediate points to any point or points in the United States and beyond. TAM requests that its exemption authority be granted for a minimum of two years.</p>
					<p class="justified">The one-year duration of the authority we granted is consistent with our usual policy of granting exemption authority in the circumstances presented. We, therefore, dismissed the application to the extent that it sought authority for a longer period.</p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="justified">TAM&rsquo;s existing exemption authority in the instant Docket permits it to conduct scheduled combination services between a point or points in Brazil, via intermediate points, and: New York, New York/Newark, New Jersey; Atlanta, Georgia; Miami, Florida; Orlando, Florida; Detroit, Michigan; Washington, DC; Baltimore, Maryland; Houston, Texas; Chicago, Illinois; San Francisco, California; Los Angeles, California; and San Juan, Puerto Rico.</p>
				  </blockquote>
<br />					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.tam.com.br/">http://www.tam.com.br/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:57:57 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">565BC855-DD6A-495B-A7AC-8DF655F73DD3</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - TAM, LAN and LAN Peru - Brazil-US Codesharing</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="tamlan5112"></a><strong>TAM-Linhas Aereas, S.A., Lan Airlines S.A. and Lan Peru S.A.</strong></p>
                  <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120056.html">OST-2012-0056</a> - Blanket Statements of Authorization - Brazil-US Codesharing</p>
                  <p>Filed April 11, 2012 | Approved April 27, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/251.pdf">Department Action on Application</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">Joint application of TAM-Linhas Aereas S.A., LAN Airlines S.A. and LAN Peru S.A. for blanket statements of authorization to permit the following codeshare services:</p>
                  <ul>
                    <li class="justified">TAM requests a blanket statement of authorization permitting it to display the &quot;LA&quot; designator code of LAN Airlines and LAN Peru in connection with foreign air transportation of persons property and mail on flights operated by TAM between: 1) any points in Brazil and any points in the United States (either non-stop or via third-country intermediate points); 2) any points in Brazil; 3) any points in Brazil and points in third countries; and 4) any points in the United States and points in third countries.</li>
                    <li class="justified">LAN Airlines requests a blanket statement of authorization permitting it to display the &quot;JJ&quot; designator code of TAM in connection with foreign air transportation of persons property and mail on flights operated by LAN Airlines between: 1) any points in Chile and any points in the United States (either non-stop or via third-country intermediate points); 2) any points in Chile; 3) any points in Chile and points in third countries; and 4) any points in the United States and points in third countries.</li>
                    <li class="justified">LAN Peru requests a blanket statement of authorization permitting it to display the &quot;JJ&quot; designator code of TAM in connection with foreign air transportation of persons property and mail on flights operated by LAN Peru between: 1) any points in Peru and any points in the United States (either non-stop or via third-country intermediate points); 2) any points in Peru; 3) any points in Peru and points in third countries; and 4) any points in the United States and points in third countries.</li>
                  </ul>
                  <p class="justified">The joint applicants request that the statements of authorization be granted for an indefinite duration and further request waiver of the 45-day advance filing requirement under 14 CFR Part 212.</p>
                  <p><em>By: Robert Finamore</em></p>
                  <blockquote>
                    <p><span class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.tam.com.br/">http://www.tam.com.br/</a><br>
<p>                    <a href="http://www.lan.com/">http://www.lan.com/</a></span></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:57:28 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2F6DF5EA-8B4D-4E0E-8E82-830112B46FF0</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - United - Conversion of 3 US-Russia Frequencies from Year-Round Service to Seasonal Service</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="united5112"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/unitedfilings.html">United Air Lines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                  <p><a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080157.html">OST-2008-0157</a> - Frequency Allocation - US-Russia</p>
                  <p>Filed April 6, 2012 | Issued May 1, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/257.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">Conversion of three remaining US-Russia frequencies from year-round service to seasonal service.</p>
                  <p class="justified">By Notice of Action Taken dated May 23, 2008, in the present docket, the Department allocated to United seven frequencies to operate between Washington, DC and Moscow on a year-round basis. United states that it intends to operate its Moscow service on a summer seasonal basis, and will monitor market conditions to adjust future capacity as demand warrants.</p>
                  <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                  <blockquote>
<p>                    <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.united.com/">http://www.united.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:56:57 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">BBDBAE1D-6219-46FB-BAD8-CF38D413F4BC</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Meridian, MS - Notice of Extension for Proposals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easms5112"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Meridian, Mississippi</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080112.html">OST-2008-0112</a></p>
                    <p>&nbsp;</p>
                    <p>May 1, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/256.pdf">Request of <strong>Silver Airways</strong> for Extension</a></p>
                    <p>Silver Airways is interested and would appreciate a two week extension if at all possible.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Mickey Bowman</em></p>
                    <p><br>
                    </p>
                    <p>May 1, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/258.pdf">Notice of Extension for Proposals</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">By <a href="../ostdocket2010/order20100528.html">Order 2010-5-28</a> the Department selected SkyWest Airlines, Inc., d/b /a Delta Connection to provide Essential Air Service at Meridian, Mississippi, for $686,489 annual subsidy. The rate is set to expire on June 30, 2012. With the end of the contract approaching, by <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120409.html">Order 2012-4-9</a>, April 13, 2012, we requested proposals by May 3, 2012. On May 1, 2012, Silver Airways, Inc., requested a two-week extension to submit proposals at Meridian, i.e., through May 17.</p>
                    <p class="justified">We will grant the extension request. Proposals at Meridian are now due on May 17, 2012.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Dennis DeVany</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.meridianairport.com/">http://www.meridianairport.com/</a> - Meridian Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:56:01 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">9485BE2B-AE9F-4C61-AE84-345388D1BE39</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Plattsburgh, NY and Presque Isle/Houlton, ME - Extending Service Obligation</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easmaineny5112"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Plattsburgh, New York and Presque Isle/Houlton, Maine</strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-5-1<br>
					  <a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0314783.htm">OST-2003-14783</a> - Plattsburgh<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket/ost008012.htm">OST-2000-8012</a> - Presque Isle/Houlton</p>
					<p>Issued and Served May 1, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/255.pdf">Order Extending Service Obligation</a></p>
					<p class="justified">By this Order, the Department of Transportation extends the Essential Air Service obligation of Colgan Air, Inc., operating as US Airways Express at Presque Isle, Maine, and Plattsburgh, New York, for an additional 30 days, through June 6, 2012.</p>
					<p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.plattsburghinternationalairport.com/">http://www.plattsburghinternationalairport.com/</a> - Plattsburgh International Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:55:20 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">215B80BD-03FB-4300-BB55-63CE48101F44</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Aerolitoral - Long-Term Wet-Lease with AeroMexico Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aerolitoral43012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aerolitoral.htm">Aerolitoral, S.A. de C.V.</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="../oiacarrier/aerolitoral.htm">Undocketed</a></p>
<p>April 30, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/248.pdf">Application for Renewal of Long-Term Wet-Lease with AeroMexico</a></p>
<p class="justified">On May 12, 2011 the Department, pursuant to Part 212 of the Economic Regulations, issued Aerolitoral, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a AeroMexico Connect, a flag carrier of the United Mexican States, Statement of Authorization <a href="../oia11/oia051911.html#Anchor-Aerolitoral-53555">2011-217</a>. That statement of authorization permits Aerolitoral to wet-lease aircraft on a long-term basis to Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. for AeroMexico's use in providing combination service over the latter's authorized US-Mexico transborder routes. The Statement of Authorization currently is set to expire on May 12, 2012.</p>
<p class="justified">Aerolitoral seeks renewal of the Statement of Authorization for an additional year.</p>
<p><em>Counsel: Mietus Law, John Mietus, 202-747-5212</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><a href="http://www.aerolitoral.com/http://www.aerolitoral.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.aerolitoral.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:48:01 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">159BD000-D080-4790-A343-1890EDF424BC</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Air Charter Scotland - Supplement (US-UK On-Demand)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="airchartersco43012"></a><strong>Air Charter Scotland Ltd.</strong></p>
<p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120064.html">OST-2012-0064</a> - Exemption - UK-US On-Demand</p>
<p>April 26, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/246.pdf">Supplement</a></p>
<p class="justified">Specifically, Applicant seeks to amend the Application for an Exemption of ACSL to include the following operations that are bilaterally authorized by the route descriptions contained within the EU-US Open Skies Agreement, rather than by virtue of Comity and Reciprocity. Said operations are:</p>
<ul>
  <li class="justified">Foreign charter air transportation of persons, property and mail from any point or points behind any Member State of the European Union, via any point or points in any Member State and via intermediate points to any point or points in the United States and beyond; and</li>
  <li class="justified">Foreign charter air transportation of persons, property and mail between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in any member of the European Common Aviation Area; and</li>
  <li class="justified">Foreign charter air transportation of cargo between any point or points in the United States and any other point or points; and</li>
  <li class="justified">Other charters pursuant to the prior approval requirements set forth in 14 CFR Part 212 of the Department's regulations; and</li>
  <li class="justified">Charter transportation authorized by any additional route rights made available to European Union carriers in the future.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Counsel: Aviation Professionals Group, Richard Asper, 954-763-4848</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><a href="http://www.aircharterscotland.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.aircharterscotland.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:47:39 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">C31FA56F-3411-48EC-9508-4AE641A61FDA</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Inter Island Charters - Bahamas-US Charters Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="interisland43012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/interislandcharters.html">Inter Island Charters Ltd.</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090039.html">OST-2009-0039</a> - Exemption - Bahamas-US Charters</p>
<p>April 30, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/247.pdf">Application for Renewal of an Exemption</a></p>
<p class="justified">Inter Island Charters Ltd. respectfully requests renewal of the above-captioned exemption, granted by Notice of Action Taken dated May 6, 2011 for an additional, one-year period. The Notice permits Inter Island to engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between a point or points in the Bahamas and a point or points in Florida, and other charters pursuant to 14 CFR Part 212.</p>
<p><p><em>Counsel: Mietus Law, John Mietus, 202-747-5212</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:47:14 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2D0FE3D8-07EC-4887-B713-A590B52C4DFE</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ABX Air - Response of ASTAR (Cincinnati-Mexico City/Queretaro All-Cargo)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="abx43012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/abx.htm">ABX Air, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120061.html">OST-2012-0061</a> - Exemption - Cincinnati-Mexico City/Queretaro All-Cargo Service</p>
                    <p>April 30, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/244.pdf">Response of <strong>ASTAR USA</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">ABX correctly recites in its application that AUSA is currently designated to provide service on the Cincinnati-Mexico City route, that it currently operates on this route, serving its principle customer DHL, and that no more than one carrier may be designated for this city pair segment.  Accordingly, the DOT may not approve ABX's instant application unless and until AUSA detennines to discontinue its own service on this route.</p>
                    <p class="justified">If DHL notifies AUSA that it no longer requires AUSA to provide service under its contract with AUSA, and if AUSA concludes that it does not have sufficient other sources of business to support service on the route, AUSA would provide DOT with the requisite dormancy notice specified in its certificate for Route 725 (<a href="../ostdocket2011/order20110714.html">Order 2011-7-14</a> July 28, 2011).</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Boies Schiller &amp; Flexner, Elliott Seiden, 202-237-2727</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://abxair.com" class="smalltext">http://abxair.com</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:46:41 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">CAAAFFC5-6416-4660-9793-F2B89E9C2EE5</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Caribbean Airlines - Comments of John Gilmore</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="cal43012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/caribair.html">Caribbean Airlines Limited</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0626586.html">OST-2006-26586</a> - Exemption - Trinidad &amp; Tobago-US via Intermediate Points</p>
                    <p>April 30, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/245.pdf">Comments of John Gilmore</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">I would like to draw to the attention of the Department to the applicant&rsquo;s statement in Section 4 of the instant application that &ldquo;Designation of a carrier by its homeland government is the most significant factor in determining whether grant of an application is in the public interest.&rdquo;</p>
                    <p class="justified">The Department will be aware that the applicant has not been designated by either of the respective homeland governments with respect to any of the routes for which it has sought the renewal of its exceptional exemption authorities in <a href="../ostdocket2010/ost20100232.html">OST-2010-0232</a> (Jamaica-US passim and Grenada-New York).</p>
<p>                    <p><em>By: John Gilmore, 514-716-7665</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:46:15 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">F9E82EDA-E083-47D2-BF8B-79885A377D6D</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Atka and Nikolski, AK - City of Atka in Support of Grant Aviation / Support Letter of Alaska DOT</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easak43012"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Atka and Nikolski, Alaska					</strong></p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket/ost95363.htm">OST-1995-363</a></p>
					<p><br>
					April 26, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/239.pdf">City of Atka in Support of <strong>Grant Aviation</strong></a></p>
					<p class="justified">The City of Atka, as the local government of the community of Atka,. supports granting the Essential Air Service subsidy for Atka to Grant Aviation. It is generally felt that as a larger airline Grant Aviation is better able to meet the transportation needs of Atka.</p>
					<p><em>By: Mayor Christoper Maly, 907-522-0384</em></p>
					<p><br>
                    </p>
					<p>April 27, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/237.pdf">Support Letter of <strong>Alaska Department of Transportation</strong></a></p>
					<p class="justified">This letter is to express support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service program in Alaska and the crucial connection it brings to our remote communities.</p>
					<p class="justified">Due to the isolated location of these communities and the complete lack of any road system connection, this subsidized air service is their only form of scheduled transportation. The communities of Atka and Nikolski depend on scheduled air freight, passenger and mail service for basic necessities, routine medical and health services, and economic welfare.</p>
<p>					<p><em>By: Steven Hatter</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:45:51 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">B5320AFB-6F9E-4742-9595-0146FF38D2DA</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Crescent City, CA - Proposal of SkyWest</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="eascrescent43012"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Crescent City, California</strong></p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket/ost972649.htm">OST-1997-2649</a>					</p>
					<p>April 26, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/233.pdf">Proposal of <strong>SkyWest Airlines</strong></a></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="/ostpdf84/242.pdf">Follow-Up Email of <strong>SkyWest</strong></a></p>
				  </blockquote>
<br />				  <p class="justified">We will offer a minimum of 14 round-trip flights per week. All flights have been timed to ensure they offer passengers valuable flight schedules that arrive and depart on banlc This means that they have been optimized for maximum connection opportunities in San Francisco.</p>
					<p class="justified">Service will be provided utilizing the Embraer Brasilia 120 30-seat turboprop aircraft. Sky West is the largest domestic operator of this reliable and proven aircraft type, and the aircraft is already in service on the route.</p>
					<p><em>By: Michael Thompson</em>					</p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_McNamara_Field_Airport">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_McNamara_Field_Airport</a> - Del Norte County Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:45:19 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">6555E8E3-16E3-4E4D-A917-9B8454EFE50C</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>People Express - Additional Information Response</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="people43012"></a><strong>People Express Airlines, Inc.</strong></p>
                  <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120042.html">OST-2012-0042</a> - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - Interstate Scheduled</p>
                  <p>April 27, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/235.pdf">Additional Information Response</a></p>
                  <blockquote>
                    <p class="smalltext"><a href="/ostpdf84/236.pdf">Motion for Confidential Treatment</a></p>
                  </blockquote>
<br />                  <ul>
                    <li>General Information</li>
                    <li>Management and Key Technical Personnel</li>
                    <li>Operations and Financial Position </li>
                  </ul>
                  <p><em>Counsel: Hogan Lovells, Robert Cohn, 202, 637-4999</em></p>
                  <blockquote>
<p>                    <p><a href="http://www.flypex.com" class="smalltext">http://www.flypex.com</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:44:49 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4ADD25BB-482E-49AB-9F4A-5EC50F7D52D1</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>US-Japan Alliance Case - Verification of JAL</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<br>
                    <a name="usjapan43012"></a><strong>US-Japan Alliance Case</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100059.html">OST-2010-0059</a></p>
                    <p>April 26, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/243.pdf">Verification of <strong>Japan Airlines<br>
                  </strong></a><span class="smalltext">Tsutomu Ando</span></p>
<p>                  <p><em>Counsel: JAL, Tsutomu Ando</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:44:23 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2E7FD376-E42E-4663-A36B-1BBD1A8BE882</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Beckley, Clarksburg/Fairmont and Morgantown, WV - Selecting Carrier (Silver Airways)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easwv43012"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Beckley, Clarksburg/Fairmont and Morgantown, West Virginia</strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-4-32<br>
					  <a href="../ostdocket/ost972761.htm">OST-1997-2761</a> - Beckley<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0520736.html">OST-2005-20736</a> - Clarksburg/Fairmont<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0520735.html">OST-2005-20735</a> - Morgantown</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 30, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/234.pdf">Order Selecting Carrier</a></p>
					<p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is selecting Silver Airways to provide Essential Air Service at Beckley, Clarksburg/Fairmont and Morgantown, West Virginia, for a combined annual subsidy of $5,968,744 ($2,512,494 for Beckley; $3,456,250 for Clarksburg and Morgantown), for the two-year period beginning when the carrier begins full EAS at all three communities.</p>
					<p><em>By: Susan Kurland</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p><span class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.maacinc.com/">http://www.maacinc.com/</a> - Clarksburg/Harrison-Marion Regional Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.morgantownairport.com/">http://www.morgantownairport.com/</a> - Morgantown Municipal Airport<br>
<p>				      <a href="http://www.flybeckley.com/">http://www.flybeckley.com/</a> - Raleigh County Memorial Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:43:57 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7C9667E2-746E-4AD8-8422-9FFF1B28E3CC</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Delta, China Southern and SkyWest - Additional Codesharing (US Gateways-Phoenix)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="deltacs42712" id="deltacs42712"></a><strong>Delta Air Lines, Inc., China Southern Airlines Company Limited and SkyWest Airlines, Inc.</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost972653.htm">OST-1997-2653</a> - Delta - US-China Codeshare with China Southern (Los Angeles-Guangzhou)<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket/ost995031.htm">OST-1999-5031</a> - China Southern - China-US Codeshare/Blocked Space Agreement with Delta<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2001/ost019314.htm">OST-2001-9314</a> - Delta - US-China Codeshare with China Southern<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2001/ost0110172.htm">OST-2001-10172</a> - 2001 China Codeshare Points</p>
					<p>April 27, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/222.pdf">Notice of Additional Codesharing</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Delta Air Lines, Inc. and China Southern Airlines Company Limited hereby notify the Department that, beginning no earlier than 30 days from the date of this notice, the Joint Applicants plan to add the following codesharing services:</p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="justified">the display of China Southern&rsquo;s designator code on flights operated by Delta and/or its authorized affiliates between the gateways China Southern serves in the United States, on the one hand, and Phoenix, AZ.</p>
				  </blockquote>
<br />					<p><em>Counsel: Hogan Lovells, George Carneal, 202-637-6546 for China Southern / Sascha Van der Bellen, 202-842-4184 for Delta</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.delta.com/">http://www.delta.com/</a><br>
<p>					    <a href="http://www.cs-air.com/en/">http://www.cs-air.com/en/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:33:57 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">747D4A14-D24D-4E25-AD7A-C220F3E92D01</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Transcarga Int'l - Venezuela-US Cargo Charters Amedment and Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="transcarga42712"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/transcarga.htm">Transcarga International Airways, C.A.</a></strong></p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket2001/ost0111231.htm">OST-2001-11231</a> - Exemption - Venezuela-US Cargo Charters</p>
				  <p>April 27, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/227.pdf">Application for Amendment and Renewal of an Exemption</a></p>
				  <blockquote>
				    <p class="smalltext"><a href="/ostpdf84/228.pdf">Motion for Confidential Treatment</a></p>
			      </blockquote>
<br />				  <p class="justified">Transcarga respectfully requests that the Department: (1) amend the above-captioned exemption, granted by Notice of Action Taken dated April 17, 2007, to remove the condition requiring that Transcarga use wet-leased aircraft; (2) renew and extend for an additional, one-year period the exemption as so amended; and (3) grant such additional or other relief as the Department may deem necessary or appropriate.</p>
				  <blockquote>
				    <p class="justified">Transcarga has held Department authority since 2002 to engage in charter foreign air transportation of property and mail between Venezuela and the United States and other all-cargo charters in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212.</p>
			      </blockquote>
<br />				  <p><em>Counsel: Mietus Law, John Mietus, 202-747-5212 </em></p>
				  <blockquote>
<p>				    <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.transcarga.net/">http://www.transcarga.net/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:33:33 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">D3753125-6F39-4E48-9065-795DC2418EC9</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>US-Japan Alliance Case - Verification of American</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="usjapan42712"></a><strong>US-Japan Alliance Case</strong></p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100059.html">OST-2010-0059</a></p>
				  <p>April 27, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/231.pdf">Verification of <strong>American Airlines<br>
				  </strong></a><span class="smalltext">Kenji Hashimoto</span></p>
<p>				  <p><em>Counsel: American, Kenji Hashimoto, 817-967-6520</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:33:09 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">517CBD67-9859-4F4E-986C-43364ADE3D91</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Tiara Air - Aruba-US</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="tiara42712"></a><strong>Tiara Air N.V.</strong></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110215.html">OST-2011-0215</a> - Exemption - Aruba-US</p>
<p>Filed November 21, 2011 | Issued April 27, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/232.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
<p class="justified">Exemption under 49 USC &sect; 40109 to permit Tiara to engage in scheduled and charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between a point or points in Aruba, on the one hand, and a point or points in the United States, on the other hand.</p>
<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><a href="http://www.tiara-air.com/" class="smalltext"><font size="-1">http://www.tiara-air.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:32:43 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4C1BDE20-B7EE-4D52-B0D0-5E2489005228</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Air Charter Scotland - US-UK On-Demand</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="charterscotland42412"></a><strong>Air Charter Scotland Ltd.</strong></p>
					<p>OST-2012-0064 - Exemption - US-UK On-Demand</p>
					<p>April 24, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/206.pdf">Application for an Exemption</a></p>
					<p class="justified">AIR CHARTER SCOTLAND LTD. hereby submits its application for an Exemption to the extent necessary to permit AIR CHARTER SCOTLAND LTD. to engage in on-demand foreign air transportation of persons and property between a point or points in the United Kingdom and/or Europe, and a point or points in the United States of America. This authority is requested on the basis of the EU-US Open Skies Agreement existing between the authorities of the USA and the European Union.</p>
					<p class="justified">AIR CHARTER SCOTLAND LTD. plans to initiate USA operations using its Gulfstream G200, Embraer Legacy 600 and Embraer Legacy 650 equipment.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Aviation Professionals Group, Richard Asper, 954-763-4848</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.aircharterscotland.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.aircharterscotland.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:01:48 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">84CD395C-F3F0-436A-9577-F24EBE4B4DFC</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>China Eastern - US-China Reciprocal Codesharing with Delta Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="chinaeastern42412"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/chinaeastern.htm">China Eastern Airlines Corporation Ltd.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110065.html">OST-2011-0065</a> - Statements of Authorization - US-China Reciprocal Codesharing</p>
                    <p>April 23, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/203.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption Authority</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">By Notice of Action Taken on May 6, 2011 in Docket <a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110065.html">OST-2011-0065</a>, the Department granted China Eastern an exemption from 49 USC &sect; 41301 to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail on a codeshare-only basis with Delta/Delta Connection, between points in the United States and behind, intermediate, and beyond points in third countries. China Eastern requests renewal of this authority for a period of one year.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Eckert Seamans, Evelyn Sahr, 202-659-6622</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flychinaeastern.com/">http://www.flychinaeastern.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:01:27 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5DFA7C88-80DA-45B8-8CF1-9C53DD61C64B</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Staunton, VA - Request for Submission Deadline Extension by Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easstaunton42412"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Staunton, Virginia</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2002/ost0211378.htm">OST-2002-11378</a></p>
					<p>April 22, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/201.pdf">Request for Submission Deadline Extension by <strong>Silver Airways</strong></a></p>
					<p class="justified">Silver Airways respectfully requests an extension of the submission deadline date of April 25, 2012 as set by the Department of Transportation in its' solicitation of carrier proposals in the above mentioned city to on or about May 9, 2012. Silver Airways does not feel the current deadline date will allow it sufficient time to complete its necessary due diligence on this market, nor complete negotiations with its codeshare partner.</p>
					<p><em>By: Silver Airways, Mickey Bowman, 270-303-8719</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flyshd.com/">http://www.flyshd.com/</a> - Shenandoah Valley Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:01:03 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">8E8448EC-B929-450B-96A3-7A792997B339</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Michael &amp; Elena Gurevich v CAI - Answer of CAI</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="michaelvcai42412"></a><strong>Michael &amp; Elena Gurevich v Compagnia Aereas Italiana S.p.A.</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120040.html">OST-2012-0040</a></p>
                    <p>April 20, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/199.pdf">Answer of <strong>Alitalia - Compagnia Aerea Italiana</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">The Notice of Exemption requires that Alitalia and other carriers file a rules tariff dealing with &quot;Liability of Carriers.&quot; Alitalia complied with its obligation to do so using language in use for decades and which, upon information and belief, is still used by numerous air carriers and foreign air carriers. Alitalia has begun taking the steps necessary to avoid any confusion on the part of passengers as to whether or not Alitalia's conditions of carriage apply, as a matter of contract, to their transportation to or from the United States or Canada. Petitioners' Formal Complaint should be dismissed.</p>
<p>                    <p><em>Counsel: Zuckert Scoutt, Richard Mathias, 202-298-8660</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:00:34 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">D6DA3204-0A10-4C3F-9E59-767089861BBB</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Volga-Dnepr - Huntsville-Vandenberg AFB Emergency Exemption</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="volga42412"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/volgafilings.html">Volga-Dnepr J.S. Cargo Airline</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120060.html">OST-2012-0060</a> - Emergency Exemption - Huntsville-Vandenberg AFB</p>
<p>Filed April 18, 2012 | Issued April 24, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/205.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
<p class="justified">Exemption from 49 USC &sect; 40109(g) to permit the applicant to operate two, one-way, cargo charter flights, using its AN-124-100 aircraft, carrying outsized cargo on behalf of United Launch Alliance between Huntsville, Alabama and Vandenberg AFB, California, on or about April 26-May 1, 2012. The applicant states that the cargo to be transported consists of an Atlas Centaur III tank and an Atlas Booster tank. The applicant asserts that ULA needs the subject lift to meet aggressive fabrication schedules associated with mission integration and launch; that the cargo is too large for transportation on commercially available US-carrier aircraft; and that surface transportation is not feasible because of the size, delicate nature, and high value of the cargo.</p>
<p><em>By: Susan Kurland</em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>  <p><a href="http://www.volga-dnepr.com/http://www.volga-dnepr.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.volga-dnepr.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:00:08 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">659D5953-8C74-4DAC-82EA-6D1C809EE183</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Icelandair - Final Order (Iceland/Norway-US)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="icelandair42412"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/icelandair.html">Icelandair ehf.</a></strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-4-28<a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110183.html"><br>
                    OST-2011-0183</a> - Exemption and Foreign Air Carrier Permit - Iceland/Norway-US</p>
                    <p>Issued February 21, 2012 | Served April 24, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/204.pdf">Final Order</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">By <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120126.html">Order 2012-1-26</a>, issued January 27, 2012, we directed all interested persons to show cause why we should not make final our tentative findings and conclusions stated therein and award a foreign air carrier permit in the form attached to the Order and subject to the conditions attached thereto. We gave interested persons 21 days to file objections to the Order. We said that if no objections were filed, all further procedural steps would be deemed waived, and the Department would enter an order (subject to Presidential review under 49 USC &sect;41307) which would make final the findings and conclusions of the Order.</p>
                    <p class="justified">No objections were received within the time period provided.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.icelandair.com/" class="smalltext"><font size="-1">http://www.icelandair.com/</font></a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:59:41 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">6733102A-8E22-4109-B858-6CDACF07F869</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>People Express - Request for Additional Information</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="People"></a>People Express Airlines, Inc.</strong></p>
                  <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120042.html">OST-2012-0042</a> - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - Interstate Scheduled</p>
                  <p>April 19, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="../ostpdf84/190.pdf">Re: Request for Additional Information</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">We have determined that we will need additional and/or clarifying information before we may complete our review. The attached Information Request lists the areas where further information and/or clarification is necessary. I ask that you respond fully to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter.</p>
                  <p><em>By: Air Carrier Fitness, Catherine O'Toole</em></p>
                  <blockquote>
<p>                    <p><a href="http://www.flypex.com" class="smalltext">http://www.flypex.com</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:54:19 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7897D7CA-E0CB-4C2E-A9C6-80EA7F35C141</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lufthansa and BMI - Sale of BMI by Lufthansa</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="Lufthansa"></a>Lufthansa and British Midland Airways</strong></p>
				  <p><a href="../ostdocket2008/ost080234.html">OST-2008-0234</a></p>
				  <p>April 19, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="../ostpdf84/194.pdf">Re: Sale of BMI by Lufthansa</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">As a consequence of the sale of BD by Lufthansa, BD's participation in all alliance agreements with the Immunized Carriers as well as its participation in the Transatlantic Joint Venture Agreement among Air Canada, Continental Airlines, United Air Lines and Lufthansa terminates effective April 19, 2012. Accordingly, effective April 19, 2012, the Immunized Carriers relinquish antitrust immunity with respect to BD granted pursuant to DOT Orders <a href="../ostdocket2009/order090710.html">2009-7-10</a> and <a href="../ostdocket2011/order20111116.html">2011-11-16</a>.</p>
				  <p><em>Counsel: Lufthansa</em></p>
				  <blockquote>
				    <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.flybmi.com/">http://www.flybmi.com/</a><br>
<p>				      <a href="http://www.lufthansa.com/">http://www.lufthansa.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:53:55 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">FA356B3A-DC0D-419E-933D-23657D94AE56</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Rutland, VT - Payout Procedures for Temporary Closure of Rutland-Southern Vermont Regional Airport</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="Rutland"></a>Essential Air Service at Rutland, Vermont</b></p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0521681.html">OST-2005-21681</a></p>
				  <p>April 19, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="../ostpdf84/196.pdf">Re: Payout Procedures As a Result of the Temporary Closure of Rutland-Southern Vermont Airport</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">The Rutland-Southern Vermont Regional Airport provided notice to Cape Air that it would close its main runway for construction related to an instrument landing system, from April 30, 2012, through May 4, 2012. Cape Air currently provides subsidized EAS at Rutland for a rate of $375 per arrival/departure.</p>
				  <p><em>By: EAS &amp; Domestic Analysis, Dennis DeVany</em></p>
				  <blockquote>
<p>				    <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.vermontairports.com/rutland.html">http://www.vermontairports.com/rutland.html</a> - Rutland State Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:53:27 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">20BBB0F9-62D0-42BA-8652-EB5730874F6C</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Atka and Nikolski, AK - Comparison of Proposals of Servant Air and Grant Aviation (By Servant)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="Atka"></a>Essential Air Service at Atka and Nikolski, Alaska</strong></p>
				  <p><a href="../ostdocket/ost95363.htm">OST-1995-363</a></p>
				  <p>April 19, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="../ostpdf84/192.pdf">Comparison of Proposals of Servant Air and Grant Aviation</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">Two bids have been submitted to provide Essential Air Service to Atka and Nikolski from Dutch Harbor (Unalaska). Both proposals meet the Essential Service requirements, and both propose to use twinturboprop pressurized Beechcraft King Air 200 aircraft. Both propose to use Peninsula Airways for ground support in Dutch Harbor, and both carriers would rent a hanger from Penair as well. Despite these similarities, Servant Air seeks a higher subsidy payment. Servant&rsquo;s request is based on three major differences. First, Servant proposes a substantially higher level of safety and operational reliability. Servant will use two-pilot flight crews. This is particularly important given the convoluted approaches to both Nikolski and Atka. For aircraft, Servant&rsquo;s bid assumes low time airframes and engines on the Beechcraft King Air 200 they propose to use. These aircraft are more reliable and require less maintenance in the initial periods than the initially lower-cost but higher time and less reliable aircraft proposed by Grant.</p>
<p>				  <p><em>By: Servant Air, Wes Osowski</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:53:04 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">BFDE1837-0D98-4737-A6F0-D69E304B8F0D</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cherokee Air - Bahamas-US Passenger Charters</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="Cherokee"></a>Cherokee Air, Ltd.</strong></p>
				  <p>OST-2012-0062 - Exemption - Bahamas-US Passenger Charters</p>
				  <p>April 20, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="../ostpdf84/193.pdf">Application for an Exemption</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">Cherokee Air intends to operate its US service with its existing fleet of four Cessna Caravan C208B aircraft (Reg'n #'s: C6-ACS; C6-SBH; and C6-SBI) and a single Piper Aztec (Reg'n #: C6-CAL).</p>
				  <p><em>Counsel: Pierre Murphy, 202-776-3980</em></p>
				  <blockquote>
<p>				    <p><a href="http://www.cherokeeair.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.cherokeeair.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:52:40 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">46A0C498-BCEA-4AE3-95E0-7812F1C380F4</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republic Airline - Denver/Kansas City-Mexican Cities Codesharing with Frontier Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="republic41912"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/republicairlines.htm">Republic Airline, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                  <p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100152.html">OST-2010-0152</a> - Exemption - Denver/Kansas City-Mexican Cities</p>
                  <p>April 19, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/171.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption Authority</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">Republic hereby applies under 49 USC &sect; 40109 for renewal of exemption authority authorizing Republic to continue to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail on the following US-Mexico routes under the Frontier Airlines, Inc. brand and designator code:</p>
                  <blockquote>
                    <p>Denver, Colorado&ndash;San Jose del Cabo, Mexico;<br>
                      Denver, Colorado&ndash;Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Mexico;<br>
                      Denver, Colorado&ndash;Puerto Vallarta, Mexico;<br>
                      Kansas City, Missouri&ndash;Puerto Vallarta, Mexico; and<br>
                      Kansas City, Missouri&ndash;San Jose del Cabo, Mexico</p>
                  </blockquote>
<br />                  <p class="justified">Republic is not seeking renewal of authority to serve the Denver-Mazatlan, Mexico route (previously granted in this Docket). By Letter dated March 17, 2011, Republic informed the Department that it had not started this service by the start-up date and had no plans to do so. Nor is Frontier seeking renewal of the exemption authority for DEN-ZIH and MCI-SJD it received in this Docket because that exemption authority was subsumed and is now encompassed by its Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Route 904, issued by DOT <a href="../ostdocket2011/order20110612.html">Order 2011-6-12</a>.</p>
                  <p><em>Counsel: Hogan Lovells, Robert Cohn, 202-637-4999</em></p>
                  <blockquote>
<p>                    <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.republicairlines.com/">http://www.republicairlines.com/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:41:53 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">E8F28FA1-5104-457A-AB71-A135AEDD82B5</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Aerolitoral - Mexico City-Houston Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aerolitoral41912"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aerolitoral.htm">Aerolitoral, S.A. de C.V.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100070.html">OST-2010-0070</a> - Exemption - Mexico City-Houston</p>
                    <p>Filed March 27, 2012 | Issued April 18, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/175.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal of exemption under 49 USC &sect;40109 to permit the applicant to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Mexico City, Mexico and Houston, Texas.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.aerolitoral.com/">http://www.aerolitoral.com/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:41:25 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">037EB8E3-3BEA-4D67-8121-5F793E530696</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - AeroMexico - Mexico City-Chicago Renewal / Mexico City-Fresno Renewal / Cancun-Miami Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aerom41912"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aeromexicofilings.html">Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.</a></strong></p>
					<p><br>
					</p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost006816.htm">OST-2000-6816</a> - Exemption - Mexico City-Chicago</p>
					<p>Filed March 30, 2012 | Issued April 18, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/169.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Mexico City, Mexico and Chicago, Illinois.</p>
					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
					<p><br>
					  <br>
				    <a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110075.html">OST-2011-0075</a> - Exemption - Mexico City-Fresno</p>
					<p>Filed March 30, 2012 | Issued April 18, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/173.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Mexico City, Mexico and Fresno, California.</p>
					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
					<p><em><br>
					</em></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110080.html">OST-2011-0080</a> - Exemption - Cancun-Miami</p>
					<p>Filed March 30, 2012 | Issued April 18, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/174.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Cancun, Mexico and Miami, Florida.</p>
					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch </em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.aeromexico.com/">http://www.aeromexico.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:40:59 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">0C0565BB-F4AA-443C-98B2-516BB0D2B11D</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - AeroMexico and SkyWest / Delta, ExpressJet, Comair, Pinnacle Airlines and Aerolitoral - US-Mexico Codesharing Amendments and Renewals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aerometc41912"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aeromexicoskywest.html">Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and SkyWest Airlines, Inc.</a></strong> / <strong>Delta Air Lines, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., Comair, Inc., Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Aerolitoral, S.A. de C.V. d/b/a AeroMexico Connection</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080305.html">OST-2008-0305</a> - Exemption and Statement of Authorization - Salt Lake City-Guadalajara/Mazatlan/Puerto Vallarta/San Jose del Cabo Codeshare<br>
                      <a href="../ostdocket/ost973289.htm">OST-1997-3289</a> - AeroMexico - Exemption - Blanket US-Mexico Beyond Gateways Codesharing<br>
                      <a href="../ostdocket/ost007708.htm">OST-2000-7708</a> - Delta and AeroMexico - Exemption/Statement of Authorization - United States-Mexico Codesharing<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2001/ost0110833.htm">OST-2001-10833</a> - Delta and Aerolitoral - Statement of Authorization - US-Mexico Codesharing</p>
                    <p>Filed April 12, 2012 | Issued April 19, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/176.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal and Amendment of exemption for <strong>Delta</strong>:</p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="justified">Delta requests renewal of its exemption to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in the United States and points within Mexico beyond Delta&rsquo;s authorized Mexican gateway points for transborder services, for the purpose of blind-sector code sharing services operated between the Mexican gateway points and other points within Mexico on services operated by AeroMexico or Aerolitoral.</p>
                      <p class="justified">Delta also requests amendment of that authority to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in the United States and points worldwide beyond/behind Delta&rsquo;s authorized Mexican gateway points for transborder services, for the purpose of blind-sector codesharing services operated between the Mexican gateway points and points worldwide on services operated by AeroMexico or Aerolitoral.</p>
                    </blockquote>
<br />                    <p class="justified">Amended statements of authorization for <strong>Delta</strong>, <strong>Comair</strong>, <strong>ExpressJet</strong>, <strong>Pinnacle</strong> and <strong>SkyWest</strong>:</p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="justified">Delta, Comair, ExpressJet, Pinnacle and SkyWest request amended statements of authorization to permit them to display Aeromexico&rsquo;s &ldquo;AM&rdquo; designator code on Delta/Delta Connection flights between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in third countries on a blind-sector basis for the carriage of AeroMexico&rsquo;s traffic between Mexico and third countries.</p>
                    </blockquote>
<br />                    <p class="justified">Special authorization for <strong>AeroMexico</strong>:</p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="justified">AeroMexico requests a special authorization under 14 CFR Part 216 to permit AeroMexico to commingle traffic between Mexico and third countries (that is, traffic not in foreign air transportation) on the same services that carry traffic that is in foreign air transportation between Mexico and the United States and between the United States and third countries, in conjunction with third-country codesharing services with Delta/Delta Connection. AeroMexico requests this special authorization be granted for an indefinite period.</p>
                    </blockquote>
<br />                    <p class="justified">Amended statement of Authorization for <strong>AeroMexico</strong>:</p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="justified">Aeromexico requests an amended statement of authorization to permit AeroMexico to display Delta&rsquo;s &ldquo;DL&rdquo; designator code on Aeromexico flights between any point or points in Mexico and any point or points in third countries on a blind-sector basis for the carriage of Delta&rsquo;s traffic between the United States and third countries.</p>
                    </blockquote>
<br />                    <p class="justified">Amended statement of authorization for <strong>Aerolitoral</strong>:</p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="justified">Aerolitoral requests an amended statement of authorization to permit Aerolitoral to display Delta&rsquo;s &ldquo;DL&rdquo; designator code on Aerolitoral flights between any point or points in Mexico and any point or points in third countries on a blind-sector basis for the carriage of Delta&rsquo;s traffic between the United States and third countries.</p>
                    </blockquote>
<br />                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p><span class="smalltext"><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.skywest.com/">http://www.skywest.com/<br>
                      </a><a href="http://www.aeromexico.com/">http://www.aeromexico.com/</a></font><br>
                      <a href="http://www.aerolitoral.com/">http://www.aerolitoral.com/</a><br>
                      <a href="http://www.expressjet.com/">http://www.expressjet.com/</a><br>
                      <a href="http://www.delta.com/">http://www.delta.com/</a><br>
                      <a href="http://www.comair.com/">http://www.comair.com/</a><br>
<p>                      <a href="http://www.flypinnacle.com/">http://www.flypinnacle.com/</a></span></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:40:22 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5C52EB2F-BDED-4A69-9C6D-69B573F4AC56</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Intra-Alaska Bush Mail Rates - Bush Quarterly Fuel Adjustment</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="ak41912"></a><strong>Intra-Alaska Bush Mail Rates</strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-4-25<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0314694.htm">OST-2003-14694</a></p>
                    <p>Issued and Served April 19, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/180.pdf">Bush Quarterly Fuel Adjustment</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is making its regular quarterly adjustments to the Intra-Alaska bush mail rates, Part 121 and Part 135, to reflect the most recent quarterly fuel costs. The new rates are to be effective on the first Saturday after the issuance of this Order, and reflect fuel expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2011. We will update the Seaplane rate at a later time when we have reliable data from Taquan.</p>
<p>                    <table width="653" border="1">
<br />                      <tr>
<br />                        <td><strong>Class Rate</strong></td>
<br />                        <td><strong>Current Rate <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120206.html">Order 2012-2-6</a></strong></td>
<br />                        <td><strong>Old Fuel QE 9-30-11</strong></td>
<br />                        <td><strong>New Fuel QE 12-31-11</strong></td>
<br />                        <td><strong>New Rate</strong></td>
<br />                        <td><strong>Rate New Rate</strong></td>
<br />                      </tr>
<br />                      <tr>
<br />                        <td>Terminal</td>
<br />                        <td>$716.16</td>
<br />                        <td>NA</td>
<br />                        <td>NA</td>
<br />                        <td>$716.16</td>
<br />                        <td>NA</td>
<br />                      </tr>
<br />                      <tr>
<br />                        <td>Part 121</td>
<br />                        <td>$5.9756/RTM</td>
<br />                        <td>$1.2617/RTM</td>
<br />                        <td>$1.2597/RTM</td>
<br />                        <td>$5.9736/RTM</td>
<br />                        <td>-0.03%</td>
<br />                      </tr>
<br />                      <tr>
<br />                        <td>Part 135, Fixed</td>
<br />                        <td>$380.27/Ton</td>
<br />                        <td>0</td>
<br />                        <td>0</td>
<br />                        <td>$403.12/Ton</td>
<br />                        <td>6.01%</td>
<br />                      </tr>
<br />                      <tr>
<br />                        <td>Part 135, Flexed</td>
<br />                        <td>$7.6395/RTM</td>
<br />                        <td>0</td>
<br />                        <td>0</td>
<br />                        <td>$8.0986/RTM</td>
<br />                        <td>6.01%</td>
<br />                      </tr>
<br />                    </table>
<br /><p><em>By: Todd Homan</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:39:52 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2DD9199D-F423-43BE-AF0A-C6FE10FB5B88</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Swift Jet - Consent Order (Prior Authorization Requirement)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="swift41912"></a><strong>Swift Jet, Inc.</strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-4-24<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120002.html">OST-2012-0002</a> - Violations of 49 USC &sect;&sect; 41301 and 41712 and 14 CFR 212.9(b)(1)</p>
                    <p>Issued and Approved April 19, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/179.pdf">Consent Order</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">This consent order concerns violations by Swift Jet, Inc. of 14 CFR 212.9(b), the Department&rsquo;s prior authorization requirement rule for foreign air carriers. It directs Swift Jet to cease and desist from future violations of those provisions and assesses the carrier a compromise civil penalty of $10,000.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Swift Jet is a foreign air carrier that holds a Canadian charter air taxi registration pursuant to 14 CFR Part 294. This registration does not authorize Swift Jet to conduct fifth-freedom charters to or from the United States. Rather, Swift Jet, and all other similarly situated foreign air carriers, must obtain a &ldquo;statement of authorization&rdquo; under 14 CFR 212.9(b)(1) prior to performing a fifth-freedom charter. Notwithstanding this requirement, in January 2012, Swift Jet conducted a fifth-freedom charter flight, from Anguilla in the Caribbean to Wilmington, DE to White Plains, NY without having been granted a statement of authorization covering this operation.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Rosalind Knapp</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.swiftjet.com/">http://www.swiftjet.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:39:03 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">24178E4F-77B4-4B29-A6B2-EAC475EFB183</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Volga-Dnepr - Huntsville-Vandenberg AFB Emergency Exemption</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="volga41812"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/volgafilings.html">Volga-Dnepr J.S. Cargo Airline</a></strong></p>
                    <p>OST-2012-0060 - Emergency Exemption - Huntsville-Vandenberg AFB</p>
                    <p>April 18, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf85/162.pdf">Application for an Emergency Exemption</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">Volga-Dnepr J.S. Cargo Airline respectfully requests an emergency exemption so as to permit Volga-Dnepr to operate two one-way cargo charter flights, utilizing Volga-Dnepr's AN-124-100 aircraft to transport cargo from Huntsville, Alabama to Vandenberg AFB, California on around April 26, 2012 - May 1, 2012, on behalf of United Launch Alliance.</p>
                  <p class="justified">The outsize cargo to be transported by Volga-Dnepr consists of the Atlas Centaur III tank, measuring (52' L x 12' W x 14' H), weighing approx. 40,150 pounds, and the Atlas Booster tank, measuring (119' L x 13 '6&quot; W x 14' H), weighing approx. 81,400 pounds. As described, the payload is outsized and cannot be accommodated by domestic commercial carrier aircraft.</p>
                  <p><em>Counsel: Volga-Dnepr, Artem Tarasenko, 832-585-8611</em></p>
                  <blockquote>
<p>                    <p><a href="http://www.volga-dnepr.com/http://www.volga-dnepr.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.volga-dnepr.com/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:37:16 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">8300D23A-3CC3-4954-905E-ECB4BFBE82A7</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Delta, KLM and SkyWest - Expansion of Codesharing</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="deltaklm41812"></a><strong>Delta Air Lines, Inc., KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and SkyWest Airlines, Inc.</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2004/ost0419214.html">OST-2004-19214</a></p>
					<p>April 18, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/165.pdf">Joint Application for a Statement of Authorization</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Delta, KLM and SkyWest have agreed to expand codesharing to encompass flights operated by SkyWest on Delta&rsquo;s behalf. Accordingly, the Joint Applicants request a blanket statement of authorization under 14 CFR Part 212, permitting SkyWest to display KLM&rsquo;s &ldquo;KL*&rdquo; designator code on flights operated by SkyWest: (a) within the United States (in conjunction with KLM&rsquo;s services in foreign air transportation), and (b) between the United States and third countries.</p>
<p>					<p><em>Counsel: Sascha Van der Bellen, 202-842-4184 for Delta / Willem de Jonge, 31-20-649-2349 for KLM / Crowell &amp; Moring, Gerald Murphy, 202-624-2500 for SkyWest</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:36:38 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">0AE143EF-F369-4B4F-881C-8D33B6EBC2D5</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Jeju Air - Support Letter of AB Won Pat Int'l Airport</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="jeju41812"></a><a href="../ostcarrier/jejuair.html"><strong>Jeju Air Co., Ltd.</strong></a></p>
<p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120050.html">OST-2012-0050</a> - Exemption and Foreign Air Carrier Permit - Korea-US</p>
<p>April 17, 2012</p>
<p><a href="/ostpdf84/164.pdf">Support Letter of AB Won Pat International Airport</a></p>
<p class="justified">As our island prepares to enter into an era of unprecedented economic development and opportunity, Jeju Air will be a welcomed airline partner for GIAA. Jeju Air's proposed low cost carrier model will provide an alternative choice of air service between South Korea and the United States, most notably the territory of Guam. While we support additional air service from Incheon, GIAA is excited on the direct air service from Pusan, South Korea's second largest city and, presently unserved from Guam.</p>
<p><p><em>By: Michael Ysrael</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:35:52 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7C730CC2-6642-4F62-88B3-3AEE2D07A7CB</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Morgantown, WV - Morgantown Municipal Airportin Support of Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easmorgantown41812"></a><b>Essential Air Service at Morgantown, West Virginia</b></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0520735.html">OST-2005-20735</a></p>
                    <p>April 11, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/161.pdf">Morgantown Municipal Airport in Support of <strong>Silver Airways</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">I would like to express my support on behalf of the City of Morgantown for Silver Airways proposal to provide subsidized air service for the community of Morgantown, WV to Washington Dulles International Airport.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Morgantown Municipal Airport and the people of Morgantown look forward to working with Silver on a transition plan in the short term and in developing a long term relationship. We enthusiastically support the proposal by Silver Airways to provide this much needed service.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Michael Clow</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.morgantownairport.com/">http://www.morgantownairport.com/</a> - Morgantown Municipal Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:35:15 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7D6F31ED-8F98-49E0-A890-6B1ECA46A545</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Clarksburg/Fairmont and Morgantown, WV - North Central West Virginia and Benedum Airport Authority in Support of Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="Clarksburg"></a>Essential Air Service at Clarksburg/Fairmont and Morgantown, West Virginia</b></p>
                    <p><a href="ost0520736.html">OST-2005-20736</a></p>
                    <p>April 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="../ostpdf84/166.pdf">Re: <strong>North Central West Virginia Airport and The Benedum Airport Authority</strong> in Support of Silver Airways</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">We are very pleased that Silver wishes to continue a similar service to what Colgan Air is currently providing. Serving Clarksburg and Morgantown with 18 trips per week is very important to our community. We feel that any aircraft smaller than the 34-passeneger Saab 340B+ would not be opportune for serving our community. It would certainly be a step backwards and hinder both immediate and future growth. Therefore we are very excited to move forward with the same plane and route structure for our market.</p>
                    <p class="justified">The flight schedule is an area of debate with our airport. We understand that the schedule has not been finalized for our Clarksburg/ Morgantown (CKB/ MGW) route. We understand that we are going to be linked with MGW in the daily &quot;round robin&quot; fashion. We are not opposed to this option because it seems that it is our only one. We are dedicated, just like Silver Airways, to providing the best and safest possible service. With this in mind we propose flights flying from Washington Dulles International Airport to Morgantown Hart Field ending at Clarksburg. Silver reserves the right to change the schedule to reflect the changing conditions at both the hub airport (lAD) and the spoke airports (CKB/ MGW). MGW has 5,200' of runway for takeoff and landings. CKB will have 7,800' for takeoff and landing. We feel that with a full plane it would be much safer to have the maximum amount of runway length. Flying nonstop from CKB to lAD with a full plane would allow for the greater takeoff distance. Landing distances are shorter because it is easier to stop with more weight or people aboard.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Richard Rock</em></p>
                  <blockquote>
<p>                      <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.FlyCKB.com">http://www.FlyCKB.com</a> - North Central West Virginia Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:34:39 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">A09F374B-F545-4155-AC66-4BB9DB0AD0FE</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Altoona, PA - Blair County Airport in Support of Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<br>
					  <strong><a name="Altoona"></a>Essential Air Service at Altoona, Pennsylvania</strong><br>
					  <br>
				    <a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2002/ost0211446.htm">OST-2002-11446</a></p>
				  <p>April 12, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="../ostpdf84/165.pdf">Re: <strong>The Blair County Airport Authority</strong> in Support of Silver Airways</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">The Blair County Airport Authority supports the proposal submitted by Silver Airways to provide commercial air service through the EAS program for the Altoona-Blair County Airport and Johnstown Cambria County Airports.</p>
				  <p><em>By: BCAA, Chuck Pillar</em></p>
				  <blockquote>
<p>				    <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://altoonablaircountyairport.com/">http://altoonablaircountyairport.com</a> - Altoona Blair County Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:33:59 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">381DA81D-38F1-4E0B-92C7-4DC3105491F9</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Delta and China Southern - Additional Codesharing (US-China and Intra-North America)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="deltaetc41812"></a><strong>Delta Air Lines, Inc., China Southern Airlines Company Limited and SkyWest Airlines, Inc.</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost972653.htm">OST-1997-2653</a> - Delta - US-China Codeshare with China Southern (Los Angeles-Guangzhou)<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket/ost995031.htm">OST-1999-5031</a> - China Southern - China-US Codeshare/Blocked Space Agreement with Delta<br>
                      <a href="../ostdocket2001/ost019314.htm">OST-2001-9314</a> - Delta - US-China Codeshare with China Southern<br>
                    <a href="../ostdocket2001/ost0110172.htm">OST-2001-10172</a> - 2001 China Codeshare Points</p>
					<p>April 18, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/159.pdf">Notice of Additional Codesharing</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Delta Air Lines, Inc. and China Southern Airlines Company Limited hereby notify the Department that, beginning no earlier than 30 days from the date of this notice, the Joint Applicants plan to add the following codesharing services:</p>
					<p class="justified">The display of China Southern&rsquo;s designator code on flights operated by Delta and/or its authorized affiliates, between:</p>
					<ul>
					  <li class="justified">Atlanta and Shanghai via Tokyo;</li>
					  <li class="justified">Detroit and Shanghai;</li>
					  <li class="justified">Detroit and Beijing;</li>
					  <li class="justified">Vancouver and Salt Lake City; and</li>
					  <li class="justified">Vancouver and Minneapolis/St. Paul; and</li>
				  </ul>
					<p class="justified">The display of China Southern&rsquo;s designator code on flights operated by Delta and/or its authorized affiliates between the gateways China Southern serves in the United States, on the one hand, and each of the following points within the United States, on the other hand:</p>
					<ul>
					  <li class="justified">Grand Rapids, MI;</li>
					  <li class="justified">Madison, WI;</li>
					  <li class="justified">Traverse City, MI;</li>
					  <li class="justified">Houston, TX; and</li>
					  <li class="justified">Cleveland, OH</li>
				  </ul>
					<p><em>Counsel: Sascha Van der Bellen, 202-842-4184 for Delta / Hogan Lovells, George Carneal, 202-637-6546 for China Southern</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.delta.com/">http://www.delta.com/</a><br>
<p>					    <a href="http://www.cs-air.com/en/">http://www.cs-air.com/en/ </a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:33:09 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">90F2A104-66CE-4A24-BEDA-392B4E95098C</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ABX Air - Cincinnati-Mexico City/Queretaro All-Cargo</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="ABX"></a><a href="../ostcarrier/abx.htm">ABX Air, Inc.</a></strong></p>
					<p>OST-2012- Exemption - Cincinnati-Mexico City/Queretaro All-Cargo Service</p>
					<p>April 18, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="../ostpdf84/167.pdf">Application for an Exemption and Designations</a></p>
					<p class="justified">ABX hereby requests an exemption and designations permitting it to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between Cincinnati, Ohio and Mexico City, Mexico (Benito Juarez International Airport) and between Cincinnati, Ohio and Queretaro, Mexico. ABX's proposed scheduled service between Cincinnati and Mexico City and between Cincinnati and Queretaro is fully consistent with the aviation agreement between the United States and Mexico. Pursuant to the US-Mexico Air Transport Agreement, as amended, the US may designate up to five US airlines to provide scheduled all-cargo service on routes involving Mexico City (Benito Juarez International Airport) provided that no more than one carrier is designated for any city-pair segment involving Mexico City with certain exceptions not relevant to this request.</p>
					<p class="justified">ABX understands that AST AR is currently designated to provide service on the Cincinnati-Mexico City route and that it operates on this route under contract for DHL Express. However, DHL has requested that ABX begin operating for it over this route in lieu of AST AR. As only one U.S. all-cargo carrier may be designated by the U.S. to operate over the Cincinnati-Mexico City route, ABX anticipates that ASTAR will soon be filing a dormancy notice with the Department with respect to its Cincinnati-Mexico City route authority thereby allowing for the designation of ABX on this route.</p>
					<p class="justified">ABX is currently one of the five US airlines designated by the US Government to provide scheduled all-cargo service to/from Mexico City. See Notice of Action Taken, issued July 12 ,2011 in Dockets<a href="../ostdocket2007/ost0729318.html">OST-2007-29318</a> and <a href="../ostdocket2007/ost0729319.html">OST-2007-29319</a>.</p>
				  <p><em>Counsel: Silverberg Goldman, Robert Silverberg, 202-944-3300</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://abxair.com">http://abxair.com</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:32:24 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">278CBDDF-31F0-4B47-943B-C935C66C92A8</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reciprocity Confirmations - Confirmation of Curacao</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="reciprocity41712"></a><strong>Reciprocity Confirmations</strong></p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket2006/ost0624269.html">OST-2006-24269</a></p>
					<p>April 5, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/156.pdf">Confirmation of <strong>Curacao</strong></a></p>
					<p class="justified">The undersigned, Minister of Traffic, Transport and Urban Planning of Curacao, hereby confirms that Curacao will consider application by US air carriers for approval to operate charter flights to and from Curacao in accordance with the provisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands with respect to Curacao and the United States of America signed July 14, 1998.</p>
					<p class="justified">Curacao will in addition grant approval for US air carriers to operate 7th freedom passenger charter flights on the understanding that the United States would grant similar rights to air carriers of Curacao.</p>
<p>					<p><em>By: Ch. F. Cooper</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:57:12 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">E4AED72F-15D1-4481-8C08-5E9F5C0A99A5</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Package Delivery Xpress - Bahamas-US All-Cargo Charters Amendment</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="package41712"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/packagedeliveryxpress.html">Package Delivery Xpress, Ltd.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080087.html">OST-2008-0087</a> - Exemption - Bahamas-US All-Cargo Charters</p>
                    <p>Filed March 2, 2012 | Amended March 8, 2012 | Issued April 16, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/154.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Amend existing exemption from 49 USC &sect; 41301 to the extent necessary to permit the applicant to engage in charter foreign air transportation of property between a point or points in the United States, on the one hand, and a point or points in the Bahamas, on the other hand, using small and large aircraft.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Package Delivery Xpress&rsquo; existing exemption authority (see Notice of Action Taken dated August 15, 2011, in this docket) authorizes it to engage in charter foreign air transportation of property between a point or points in the United States, on the one hand, and a point or points in the Bahamas, on the other hand, using small aircraft.</p>
<p>                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:56:42 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">8E98964F-C2CD-401E-9CF0-81C7B7E6D545</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Universal Jet Aviation - Confirming Oral Action and Issuing Effective Certificates (Foreign and Interstate Charters)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="universal41712"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/universaljet.html">Universal Jet Aviation, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-4-23<a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110150.html"><br>
                    OST-2011-0150</a> - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - Foreign Passenger Charters<a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110151.html"><br>
                    OST-2011-0151</a> - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - Interstate Passenger Charters</p>
                    <p>Issued and Served April 16, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/155.pdf">Order Confirming Oral Action and Issuing Effective Certificates</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">We confirm our oral action of April 3, 2012, making the authority contained in the interstate charter and foreign charter certificates issued to Universal Jet Aviation, Inc., by <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120135.html">Order 2012-1-35</a>, effective using one large aircraft, and reissue the certificates in the attached form to reflect their effective date. </p>
                    <p><em>By: Todd Homan </em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.ujet.com/" class="smalltext"><font size="-1">http://www.ujet.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:55:51 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">CD6852B0-A254-45C2-9F19-E288177C0EFE</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Caribbean Airlines - Trinidad &amp; Tobago-US via Intermediate Points Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="caribbean41612"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/caribair.html">Caribbean Airlines Limited</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0626586.html">OST-2006-26586</a> - Exemption - Trinidad &amp; Tobago-US via Intermediate Points</p>
                    <p>April 16, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/153.pdf">Application for Renewal of an Exemption</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">By this application, CAL seeks renewal of the above-captioned exemption. The authority is scheduled to expire on April 21, 2012. CAL is currently using the exemption authority to provide nonstop Port of Spain-Miami and Port of Spain-New York service. These flights provide significant benefits to the traveling public, and CAL therefore seeks to renew the authority for an additional year.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Mietus Law, John Mietus, 202-747-5212</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.caribbean-airlines.com/">http://www.caribbean-airlines.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:27:55 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7032908D-8217-4B82-8C1F-82A15DE2E072</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IATA - Currency Names, Codes, Rounding Units and Acceptability of Currencies – Azerbaijan</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="iata41612"></a><strong><a href="../iata/iata.html">International Air Transport Association</a></strong></p>
					<p>OST-2012-0059</p>
					<p>April 16, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/151.pdf">Application for Approval of Agreements</a></p>
					<p>PTC COMP Mail Vote 705<br>
					  Resolution 024d<br>
					  Currency Names, Codes, Rounding Units and Acceptability of Currencies &ndash; Azerbaijan<br>
					  Intended Effective Date: 1 May 2012<br>
				    (Memo 1671)</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: IATA, Douglas Lavin</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.iata.org/" class="smalltext">http://www.iata.org/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:27:28 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">375AC9DE-7289-41E1-B52B-9156E4C76164</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>VIH Cougar Helicopters - Reply in Support of VIH Cougar Helicopters' Motion to Stay</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="cougar41612"></a><strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc.</strong></p>
					<p><br>
					  <br>
				    <a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120022.html">OST-2012-0022</a> - Submission of Aviation Consumer Protection Division Webpage On-Line Aviation Complaint Form</p>
					<p>April 13, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/150.pdf">Reply in Support of <strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters</strong>' Motion to Stay</a></p>
					<p class="justified">PHI's contention that the terms of any actions by VIH Cougar to address the Department's concerns must be subject to a &quot;fully transparent and public process&quot; is specious. No private company of which we are aware has ever been required under these circumstances to share the specific details of its confidential business decisions and corporate structure with the public, let alone with competitors out to destroy the company. VIH Cougar has willingly shared the details of its remedial efforts with the Department in VIH Cougar's unredacted objections to the Order to Show Cause and related Motion to Stay. The public, however, has no right to access VIH Cougar's non-public confidential corporate information and trade secrets relating to VIH Cougar's private business decisions.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Dickstein Shapiro, David Nadler, 202-420-2200</em></p>
					<p><br>
                    </p>
                    <p>Order 2012-4-22<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120022.html">OST-2012-0022</a> - Submission of Aviation Consumer Protection Division Webpage On-Line Aviation Complaint Form</p>
                    <p>Issued and Served April 16, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/149.pdf">Order Denying Motion of <strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Contrary to VIH Cougar&rsquo;s contentions, access to the information it seeks is neither necessary to demonstrate its compliance with the citizenship requirements, nor relevant to this proceeding. As noted in <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120307.html">Order 2012-3-7</a>, the Department based its tentative determination regarding VIH Cougar&rsquo;s citizenship on the company&rsquo;s responses to our various requests for information and on information available publicly. That information has been placed in the docket, which constitutes the record upon which a decision in this proceeding will be based. Therefore, we find no basis to incorporate any information sought by VIH Cougar&rsquo;s motion into this proceeding. Furthermore, although the Department&rsquo;s regulations require the disclosure of certain prohibited communications in public proceedings, the information VIH Cougar requests predates the institution of this proceeding and thus, is not covered by that rule.</p>
                    <p class="justified">In light of the foregoing, we deny VIH Cougar&rsquo;s motion requesting the inclusion in the docket of communications and documents between the Department and all third parties related to this matter. However, in an effort to be responsive to VIH Cougar&rsquo;s request, the Department will treat VIH Cougar&rsquo;s request for the aforementioned information as a request under the Freedom of Information Act and refer this matter to the Department&rsquo;s FOIA Office for appropriate handling.</p>
                    <p class="justified">In a separate matter, on March 20, 2012, VIH Cougar filed a motion objecting to the public release of confidential information that was provided to the Department during the course of our review of VIH Cougar&rsquo;s citizenship. Since VIH Cougar&rsquo;s motion only seeks confidential treatment for information listed in Attachment A of its filing, we intend to place the information not covered by its motion in the public docket three business days after the service date of this order.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Susan Kurland</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.vihcougar.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.vihcougar.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:26:46 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">E18589FC-4B87-41B0-A5F9-5290FBCB78A0</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Volaris - Guadalajara-Los Angeles Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Concesionaria Vuela Compania de Aviacion, S.A. de C.V. d/b/a Volaris</a></b></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090119.html">OST-2009-0119</a> - Exemption - Guadalajara-Los Angeles</p>
                    <p>Filed March 26, 2012 | Issued April 16, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/152.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Guadalajara, Mexico and Los Angeles, California.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.volaris.com.mx/">http://www.volaris.com.mx/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:26:02 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5F44005F-C013-42A6-AEE3-39DB7983E83A</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Alamosa and Cortez, CO - Requesting Proposals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easalamosa41612"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Alamosa and Cortez, Colorado</strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-4-21<br>
					  <a href="/ostdocket/ost972960.htm">OST-1997-2960</a> - Alamosa<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket/ost983508.htm">OST-1998-3508</a> - Cortez</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 16, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/148.pdf">Order Requesting Proposals</a></p>
					<p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is requesting proposals, by May 15, 2012, from air carriers interested in providing Essential Air Service at Alamosa and Cortez, Colorado, for a new two-year period beginning August 1, 2012, with or without subsidy.</p>
					<p class="justified">Specifically for Alamosa and Cortez, we request proposals for service consisting of three nonstop round trips per day (18 a week) with 19-seat aircraft, or two round trips a day (12 a week) with 30-seat or larger aircraft. If eight or nine-seat aircraft are proposed, we would entertain proposals for four round trips a day (24 a week). Service should be with two-pilot, twin-engine aircraft, unless the communities agree to waive those requirements.</p>
					<p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.alamosacounty.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6&Itemid=15">http://www.alamosacounty.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=6&amp;Itemid=15</a> - San Luis Valley Regional Airport<br>
<p>					    <a href="http://www.cityofcortez.com/government/airport">http://www.cityofcortez.com/government/airport</a> - Cortez Municipal	Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:25:21 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">87B9CE21-3806-4C9E-9B6C-3D3C32795491</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Alpena, Escanaba and Iron Mountain, MI - Setting Final Rates</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easmi41612"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Alpena, Escanaba and Iron Mountain, Michigan</strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-4-20<br>
					  <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090300.html">OST-2009-0300</a> - Alpena<br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0315128.html">OST-2003-15128</a> - Escanaba<br>
                  <a href="/ostdocket/ost995175.htm">OST-1999-5175</a> - Iron Mountain/Kingsford</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 16, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/147.pdf">Order Setting Final Rates</a></p>
					<p class="justified">This Order sets final past-period and prospective rates for Delta&rsquo;s forced service at Alpena, Escanaba, and Iron Mountain. By <a href="../ostdocket2011/order20111130.html">Order 2011-11-30</a>, we selected Great Lakes to provide Essential Air Service at Iron Mountain, and by <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120410.html">Order 2012-4-10</a>, we selected Delta to provide EAS at Escanaba. This Order does not select Delta at Alpena, but rather sets a final rate for Delta&rsquo;s service there until it can be replaced by a carrier willing to provide that service on a long-term basis.</p>
					<p><em>By: Susan Kurland</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.alpenaairport.com/">http://www.alpenaairport.com/</a> - Alpena County Regional Airport</font><br>
					    <font size="-1"><a href="http://www.deltacountymi.org/airport.php">http://www.deltacountymi.org/airport.php/</a> - Delta County Airport</font>					<br>
<p>					    <font size="-1"><a href="http://www.fordairport.org/">http://www.fordairport.org</a> - Ford Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:23:07 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">9987E5C9-1A32-4B07-8490-1B67FC1C9E92</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DCA Beyond-Perimeter Slots - Answer of Southwest in Opposition to Alaska Air's Motion to Strike / Letter of Southwest to DOT</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="dca41312"></a><strong>Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Slot Exemption Proceedings</strong></p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120029.html">OST-2012-0029</a></p>
				  <p><br>
				  </p>
				  <p>April 13, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/143.pdf">Answer of <strong>Southwest Airlines</strong> in Opposition to Alaska Airlines' Motion to </a></p>
				  <p class="justified">Alaska&rsquo;s motion has no merit and should be denied. Alaska&rsquo;s motion is aimed in part at two pleadings filed by Southwest that were each accompanied by a Motion for Leave to File an otherwise unauthorized document pursuant to Rule 6 of the Department&rsquo;s Rules of Practice. As both pleadings made clear, they were in response to certain &ldquo;incorrect and/or misleading statements&rdquo; made by other applicants, and were filed in order to &ldquo;correct the record in important respects&hellip;and thereby contribute to a more accurate and informed basis for the Department&rsquo;s decision&rdquo; in this proceeding.</p>
				  <p class="justified">Southwest is well aware of the statutory deadline applicable to this case and is respectful of the Department&rsquo;s procedural schedule. At the same time, Southwest believes it is important to eliminate inaccuracy and distortion from the administrative record to the extent reasonably possible. Indeed, the filing of otherwise unauthorized documents to correct the record is hardly novel in DCA slot exemption proceedings, and Alaska has failed to explain why the Department would somehow be better off with a more inaccurate and flawed record. In any event, there is no need to &ldquo;strike&rdquo; anything in this case, for the Department is fully capable of evaluating the weight and credibility of the evidence that has been submitted by all parties.</p>
				  <p><em>Counsel: Southwest, Robert Kneisley, 202-263-6284</em></p>
				  <p><br>
				  </p>
				  <p>April 13, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/142.pdf">Letter of <strong>Southwest Airlines</strong> to DOT</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">I am writing in regard to the &quot;Response&quot; filed by Frontier Airlines on April 11, 2012 in the above-referenced docket. Even though Frontier's Response contains a number of inaccurate, misleading, and highly exaggerated statements, Southwest will not file a reply since the Response is a re-hash of baseless claims that Southwest already responded to in prior pleadings. Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served by another formal pleading at this point and instead Southwest simply states that the Response has no merit and should be disregarded.</p>
				  <p class="justified">For the reasons given in Southwest's Application and additional pleadings in this proceeding, Southwest urges the Department to grant it two beyond-perimeter slot exemptions to provide service between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and Austin, with single-plane service to San Diego.</p>
<p>				  <p><em>Counsel: Southwest, Robert Kneisley, 202-263-6284</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:54:25 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">68B6CE9B-053F-4846-AC2F-073A7F3CA9B0</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Muscle Shoals, AL and Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, MS - DOT Request for Community Comments</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easms41312"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Muscle Shoals, Alabama and Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, Mississippi</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost007856.htm">OST-2000-7856</a> - Muscle Shoals, AL<a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080209.html"><br>
                        OST-2008-0209</a> - Greenville, MS<br>
                      <a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2001/ost0110685.htm">OST-2001-10685</a> - Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090305.html">OST-2009-0305</a> - Tupelo, MS</p>
					<p>April 11, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/134.pdf"><strong>DOT</strong> Request for Community Comments</a></p>
					<p class="justified">I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service situation at Muscle Shoals, Alabama, and Greenville, Hattiesburg/Laurel and Tupelo, Mississippi, and give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We issued <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120304.html">Order 2012-3-4</a>, March 6, 2012, soliciting a third round of proposals from carriers interested in providing replacement EAS for a new term. In response to our request, two airlines. Air Choice One and Silver Airways, have submitted proposals to serve all four communities. (Silver Airways included in their bid a proposal to provide EAS at Greenbrier, WV, which is under a separate EAS contract than the four communities above.)</p>
					<p class="justified">We request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have soon as possible, but no later than Thursday, May 10.</p>
					<p><em>By: Michael Martin, 202-366-6494</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p><span class="smalltext"><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flytupelo.com/">http://www.flytupelo.com/</a> - Tupelo Regional Airport</font><br>
					    <a href="http://www.greenville.ms.us/Airport.html">http://www.greenville.ms.us/Airport.html</a> - Mid-Delta Regional Airport<br>
					    <a href="http://www.hlrairport.com/">http://www.hlrairport.com/</a> - Hattiesburg/Laurel Regional Airport<br>
<p>				      <a href="http://www.flytheshoals.com/">http://www.flytheshoals.com/</a> - Northwest Alabama Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:53:49 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">D41C8AC8-52D1-41DB-95F5-57F13E360222</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Meridian, MS - Requesting Proposals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easmeridian41312"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Meridian, Mississippi</strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-4-19<a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080112.html"><br>
                    OST-2008-0112</a></p>
                    <p>Issued and Served April 13, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/145.pdf">Order Requesting Proposals</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is requesting proposals by May 3, 2012, from carriers interested in providing Essential Air Service at Meridian, Mississippi, for the two-year period beginning July 1, 2012, with or without subsidy.</p>
                    <p class="justified">With specific respect to Meridian, we expect proposals consisting of two nonstop round trips per day (13 a week) if 30-seat or larger equipment are proposed; three (18 a week) or four (24 a week) round trips per day with 19-seat aircraft; and more frequencies with smaller aircraft. We may subsidize additional frequencies if the affected community is served in conjunction with another community.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.meridianairport.com/">http://www.meridianairport.com/</a> - Meridian Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:53:13 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">16FCF9DA-6883-41C5-AABE-BDA96FB042D4</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Frontier - Consent Order (Violations of ACAA)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="frontier41312"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/frontierairlines.html">Frontier Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-4-15<br>
			        <a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120002.html">OST-2012-0002</a> - Violations of 49 USC &sect;&sect; 41705 and 41712 and 14 CFR Part 382</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 13, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/136.pdf">Consent Order</a></p>
					<p class="justified">This order concerns violations by Frontier Airlines, Inc. of the requirements of 14 CFR Part 382 the Department of Transportation&rsquo;s regulation implementing the Air Carrier Access Act, 49 USC &sect; 41705, with respect to its transportation of an individual with a disability. Violations of Part 382 also violate the ACAA, and violations of the ACAA and Part 382 also constitute an unfair and deceptive practice in violation of 49 USC &sect; 41712. This order directs Frontier to cease and desist from future violations of Part 382 and the ACAA and assesses the carrier $50,000 in civil penalties.</p>
					<p class="justified">After investigating the incident, the Enforcement Office determined that Frontier violated section 382.41(c) by failing to inform Mr. M, on at least three occasions, of the carrier&rsquo;s limitations in accommodating his disability. In June 2009, Frontier allowed Mr. M to use the seat belt extender strapping method to secure his body in an upright position. Then, later that same month and again on June 17, 2011, Frontier&rsquo;s crew permitted Mr. M to use this same method to secure himself despite this method not being approved by the FAA. As a result of Frontier&rsquo;s accommodation of Mr. M&rsquo;s disability on prior flights, particularly the outbound flight on June 17, 2011, Mr. M was unprepared with an alternative restraint method when, on June 19, 2011, Frontier disapproved the restraint method that he was allowed to use on previous flights, including his outbound flight, resulting in his embarrassment and eventual removal from flight 227.</p>
					<p class="justified">Frontier also violated sections 382.93 and 382.95 by failing to provide pre-boarding and adequate enplaning assistance to Mr. M on June 19, 2011. Mr. M&rsquo;s numerous requests to pre-board were unsuccessful, and Mr. M was forced to wait until virtually all of the other passengers had boarded. It appears that Frontier&rsquo;s failure to pre-board Mr. M was a result of its wheelchair assistance vendor failing to respond to Frontier&rsquo;s call for service. Pursuant to 14 CFR 382.15, Frontier is responsible for ensuring that its contractors providing services to the public meet the requirements of Part 382. Frontier was ultimately able to obtain two of its own disability-trained employees (one of whom was working at baggage handling that day) to assist Mr. M but that assistance, the Enforcement Office found, was inadequate as evidenced by the fact that individuals traveling with Mr. M had to be asked to participate in the lifting of Mr. M to ensure the safety of the transfer. Furthermore, by providing enplaning and deplaning assistance to Mr. M with malfunctioning aisle chairs, Frontier also violated section 382.95. The first aisle chair that Frontier used to enplane Mr. M had its left shoulder strap completely detached from the chair. The second aisle chair that Frontier used to deplane Mr. M also had multiple straps missing. Due to the lack of proper restraint on the chair, Mr. M fell onto another passenger and was subject to further embarrassment and endangerment.</p>
					<p><em>By: Rosalind Knapp</em></p>
					<blockquote>
					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="/ostpdf84/137.pdf">Frontier Fined for Violating Rules Protecting Air Travelers with Disabilities</a> - DOT Press Release</p>
<p>					  <p class="smalltext"><a href="http://www.frontierairlines.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.frontierairlines.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:52:39 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">E07F2CBF-8DED-46F2-A080-DDC53072E269</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IATA - Further Exemption from Condition #2</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="iata41312"></a><strong><a href="../iata/iata.html">International Air Transport Association</a></strong></p>
					<p><br>
				    <a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120055.html">OST-2012-0055</a></p>
					<p>Filed April 11, 2012 | Approved April 13, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/141.pdf">Approval of Agreements</a></p>
					<p><em>By: John Kiser</em></p>
					<p><br>
                    </p>
                    <p>Order 2012-4-18<br>
                      OST-2012-0058<a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100114.html"><br>
                    OST-2010-0114</a><br>
                      <a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0626404.html">OST-2006-26404<br>
                    </a><a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0625307.html">OST-2006-25307</a> - Tariff Conference Proceeding</p>
                    <p>Issued and Served April 13, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/140.pdf">Application for Further Exemption from Condition #2</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">IATA proposes, by means of a carefully tailored exemption from condition #2, to establish a three-tiered system for the filing and implementation of traffic conference agreements:</p>
                    <ul>
                      <li class="justified">The first tier would include all traffic conference agreements except those included in tiers two and three. IATA would file all first-tier agreements, and related IATA documentation such as conference minutes, &ldquo;for information&rdquo; in a master public docket maintained by the Department, at least 30 days prior to their intended effective dates. The Department and interested parties would then have a minimum of 30 days to review each agreement. At its discretion, the Department could advise IATA on or before the thirtieth day after the date of filing to delay the effective date for an additional period of up to 60 days to allow further time for Department consideration. At any time during the review period, the Department could advise IATA to re-file the agreement in a separate docket for Department review and action. Such filings would then have to await Department action. If the Department did not give IATA notice to postpone the effective date or to re-file the agreement, then IATA would be able to declare the agreement effective according to its terms, without further Department action. Such agreements could then be implemented, but would not have antitrust immunity.</li>
                      <li class="justified">The second tier would consist of any agreements in specific subject areas listed by IATA in its application. These are subject areas which the Department has indicated that it still chooses to review on a case-by-case basis before implementation. This category would include all amendments or modifications to recommended practices, agreements and/or resolutions listed in IATA&rsquo;s application, and all new recommended practices, agreements and resolutions addressing substantially similar subjects. Examples of such subject areas include conditions of carriage for passengers and cargo, ticket notices, air waybills, carriage of cargo using electronic data interchange, cargo security, carriage of passengers requiring special assistance, and Flex Fares in US markets.</li>
                      <li class="justified">The third tier would be those recommended practices, agreements or resolutions that IATA still wishes to file with the Department for approval and antitrust immunity under sections 41308 and 41309 of the Code. As is the case now, all such filings would have to await Department review and appropriate action before implementation.</li>
                    </ul>
                    <p class="justified">We have decided to grant the exemption from condition #2 essentially as proposed by IATA.</p>
                    <p class="justified">We exempt the International Air Transport Association and its member carriers from Condition #2 imposed upon IATA&rsquo;s Provisions for the Conduct of the IATA Traffic Conferences, Agreement 1175, as amended by Order 1968-7-55, to the extent that IATA need not file agreements adopted by any Traffic Conference, within the scope of Section A of Appendix A hereto, with the Department for its review and approval prior to a declaration of effectiveness by IATA.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.iata.org/">http://www.iata.org/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:52:05 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3C327061-29E3-4995-83F1-5FE57D4BC5A5</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pilatus PC-12 Centre Canada - Consent Order (Unlawful Marketing, Sale and Operation of Charters)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="pilatus41312"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/pilatus.htm">Pilatus PC-12 Centre Canada, Inc.</a></strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-4-16<br>
				    OST-2012-0002 - Violations of 49 USC &sect; 41712 and 14 CFR Part 294</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 13, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/138.pdf">Consent Order</a></p>
					<p class="justified">This consent order concerns facilitation by Pilatus PC-12 Centre Canada, Inc. (formerly V. Kelner Pilatus Center, Inc.), a direct air carrier,1 of unlawful conduct by Private Air, Inc., an indirect air carrier, involving the marketing, sale, and operation of charter flights between Canada and the United States in which Private Air held itself out as the operator without having the requisite economic authority. By facilitating such conduct, PCC itself engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices and unfair methods of competition in violation of 49 USC &sect; 41712. This order also concerns the use by PCC of a name not listed on its Canadian air taxi registration, in violation of 14 CFR 294.31.3 Such conduct constitutes a separate violation of section 41712. This order directs PCC to cease and desist from further violations of these statutory provisions and to pay a compromise civil penalty of $20,000.</p>
					<p class="justified">The Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings began an investigation of Private Air in response to information from the FAA that Private Air was conducting charter flights to the US from Canada using aircraft bearing Private Air&rsquo;s livery. The investigation revealed that the aircraft in question was operated by PCC and that &ldquo;Private Air&rdquo; was not listed as a &ldquo;doing-business-as&rdquo; name on PCC&rsquo;s Part 294 registration, in violation of 14 CFR 294.31. Upon further investigation, the Enforcement Office found that, from January 2009 until March 2010, PCC operated a significant number of trans-border flights for charterers who had entered into contracts with Private Air for charter service that identified Private Air as the direct air carrier operating the flights, notwithstanding the fact that Private Air lacked economic authority to engage in foreign air transportation. In so doing, PCC facilitated the unlawful conduct of Private Air and itself engaged in an unfair and deceptive practice and an unfair method of competition in violation of 49 USC &sect; 41712.</p>
					<p><em>By: Rosalind Knapp</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.pilatus-aircraft.com/http://www.pilatus-aircraft.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.pilatus-aircraft.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:51:31 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">19161C77-7299-48C5-8AB2-EA887C9B12B5</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Private Air - Consent Order (Direct and Indirect Air Carrier Status)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="private41312"></a><strong>Private Air, Inc.</strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-4-17<br>
			        <a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120002.html">OST-2012-0002</a> - Violations of 49 USC &sect;&sect; 41301 and 41712</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 13, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/139.pdf">Consent Order</a></p>
					<p class="justified">This consent order concerns unlawful conduct by Private Air, Inc. in which the company held itself out as a direct air carrier, when it was not, and engaged in foreign air transportation as an indirect air carrier without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 USC &sect; 41301. These violations also constituted unfair and deceptive trade practices and unfair methods of competition in violation of 49 USC &sect; 41712. This order directs Private Air to cease and desist from further violations of these statutory provisions and it assesses a compromise civil penalty of $25,000.</p>
					<p class="justified">The Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings initiated an investigation of Private Air in response to information from the FAA indicating that Private Air had operated charter flights into the US from Canada on aircraft registered to PCC. The FAA&rsquo;s records showed that neither PCC&rsquo;s operations specifications nor its Part 294 registration listed &ldquo;Private Air&rdquo; as a &ldquo;doing-business-as&rdquo; name. Although PCC apparently was the actual aircraft operator on these occasions, the Enforcement Office subsequently learned that from January 2009 until March 2010, Private Air had entered as a principal into contracts with charterers for a significant number of trans-border flights between Canada and the US. In addition, the Enforcement Office found statements on Private Air&rsquo;s printed brochures and on its web site, such as &ldquo;Private Air operates the Pilatus PC-12 aircraft,&rdquo; that could have misled readers into believing that Private Air was a direct air carrier operating aircraft when, in fact, it did not. By holding itself out as a direct air carrier when it was not and by engaging in foreign air transportation without economic authority, Private Air violated 49 USC &sect;&sect; 41301 and 41712.</p>
					<p><em>By: Rosalind Knapp</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.privatair.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.privatair.com/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:50:58 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">F026BC04-BDD6-4592-B009-27F99ECE8096</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Submission of Tarmac Delay Plans to DOT - Notice of Information Collection</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Submission of Tarmac Delay Plans to DOT</strong></p>
				  <p>OST-2012-0057</p>
				  <p>Issued April 12, 2012 | On File at Federal Register April 16, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/135.pdf">Notice of Submission of Proposed Information Collection to DOT</a></p>
				  <p class="justified">The FAA Modernization and Reform Act, which was signed into law on February 14, 2012, requires US carriers that operate scheduled passenger service or public charter service using any aircraft with a design capacity of 30 or more seats, and operators of large hub, medium hub, small hub, or non-hub US airports to submit contingency plans for lengthy tarmac delays to the Secretary of Transportation for review and approval no later than May 14, 2012. The Act also requires each covered carrier and airport to ensure public access to its plan after DOT approval by posting the plan on its website. The Department notes that these information collection requirements are specifically required by statute and are not being imposed as an exercise of the Department&rsquo;s discretion. The Department seeks OMB approval for the submission and posting of these plans under the PRA emergency clearance process because use of the normal clearance procedures is reasonably likely to cause the May 14 statutory deadline for submission of plans to be missed. The Department has established a web address for the filing of contingency plans to enable covered US airlines and airports to easily submit their required plans through the World Wide Web. Once OMB approves this information collection, the Department intends to issue a notice that provides information on how covered US carriers and airports can submit the required plans to the Department through the World Wide Web.</p>
<p>				  <p><em>By: Samuel Podberesky</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:50:18 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">F090DFEF-BB69-4BDE-9BB5-F40A7C5DF0E7</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ABSA - Brazil-US Cargo Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="absa41212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/absa.html">Aerolinhas Brasileiras, S.A.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket/ost961372.htm">OST-1996-1372</a> - Exemption - Brazil-Miami/Amsterdam</p>
                    <p>April 11, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/131.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption Authority</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">ABSA hereby submits its application for the renewal of its exemption from:</p>
                    <ul>
                      <li class="justified">to conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail from any point or points behind Brazil, via Brazil and intermediate points, to any point or points in the United States and beyond;</li>
                      <li class="justified">to conduct charter foreign air transportation of property and mail, from any point or points behind Brazil, via Brazil and intermediate points, to any point or points in the United States and beyond, and other charters in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212; and to conduct any and all such charter foreign air transportation of property and mail, as herein described, without prior Department of Transportation approval.</li>
                  </ul>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Aerolinhas Brasileiras, Celestino Pena, 305-856-5655</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.absacargo.com.br/">http://www.absacargo.com.br/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:22:28 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">A9BA5395-460B-464F-9F27-118CC832EBF7</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AeroMexico and SkyWest / Delta, ExpressJet, Comair, Pinnacle Airlines and Aerolitoral - US-Mexico Codesharing Amendments and Renewals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="deltaaerometc41212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aeromexicoskywest.html">Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and SkyWest Airlines, Inc.</a></strong> / <strong>Delta Air Lines, Inc., ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., Comair, Inc., Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Aerolitoral, S.A. de C.V. d/b/a AeroMexico Connection</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080305.html">OST-2008-0305</a> - Exemption and Statement of Authorization - Salt Lake City-Guadalajara/Mazatlan/Puerto Vallarta/San Jose del Cabo Codeshare<br>
                      <a href="../ostdocket/ost973289.htm">OST-1997-3289</a> - AeroMexico - Exemption - Blanket US-Mexico Beyond Gateways Codesharing<br>
                      <a href="../ostdocket/ost007708.htm">OST-2000-7708</a> - Delta and AeroMexico - Exemption/Statement of Authorization - United States-Mexico Codesharing<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2001/ost0110833.htm">OST-2001-10833</a> - Delta and Aerolitoral - Statement of Authorization - US-Mexico Codesharing</p>
                    <p>April 12, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/123.pdf">Joint Application for Amended Statements of Authorization and Special Authorization and Renewal and Amendment of Exemption Authority</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">The Joint Applicants request issuance of the following authorities:</p>
                    <ol>
                      <li class="justified">amended statements of authorization to Delta, Comair, ExpressJet, Pinnacle and SkyWest pursuant to 14 CFR Part 212 adding authority to display AeroMexico&rsquo;s &ldquo;AM&rdquo; designator code on Delta/Delta Connection flights between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in third countries on a blind-sector basis for the carriage of AeroMexico&rsquo;s traffic between Mexico and third countries;</li>
                      <li class="justified">special authorization to AeroMexico pursuant to 14 CFR Part 216 to permit AeroMexico to commingle traffic between Mexico and third countries (that is, traffic not in foreign air transportation) on the same services that carry traffic that is in foreign air transportation between Mexico and the United States and between the United States and third countries, in conjunction with third-country codesharing services with Delta/Delta Connection;</li>
                      <li class="justified">an amended statement of authorization to AeroMexico pursuant to 14 CFR Part 212 adding authority to display Delta&rsquo;s &ldquo;DL&rdquo; designator code on flights operated by AeroMexico between any point or points in Mexico and any point or points in third countries on a blind-sector basis for the carriage of Delta&rsquo;s traffic between the United States and third countries; and</li>
                      <li class="justified">an amended statement of authorization to Aerolitoral pursuant to 14 CFR Part 212 adding authority to display Delta&rsquo;s &ldquo;DL&rdquo; designator code on flights operated by Aerolitoral between any point or points in Mexico and any point or points in third countries on a blind-sector basis for the carriage of Delta&rsquo;s traffic between the United States and third countries; and</li>
                      <li class="justified">renewal of an exemption to Delta pursuant to 49 USC &sect; 40109 to authorize Delta to continue to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in the United States and points within Mexico beyond/behind Delta&rsquo;s authorized Mexican gateway points for transborder services for the purpose of blind-sector codesharing services operated between the Mexican gateway points and other points within Mexico on services operated by AeroMexico and Aerolitoral, and amendment of this exemption to authorize Delta to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in the United States and points worldwide beyond/behind Delta&rsquo;s authorized Mexican gateway points for transborder services for the purpose of blind-sector codesharing services operated between the Mexican gateway points and points worldwide on services operated by AeroMexico or Aerolitoral.</li>
                    </ol>
                    <p class="justified">The Joint Applicants request that the amended codesharing statements of authorization and special authorization remain in effect indefinitely, consistent with Department practice. Delta requests that its exemption authority, as renewed and amended, be effective for an additional period of at least two years.</p>
                  <p><em>Counsel: Mietus Law, John Mietus, 202-747-5212 for AeroMexico and Aerolitoral / Crowell &amp; Moring, Gerald Murphy, 202-624-2500 for ExpressJet and SkyWest / Sascha Van der Bellen, 202-842-4184 for Delta and Comair / Brian Hunt, 901-346-6145 for Pinnacle Airlines</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="smalltext"><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.skywest.com/">http://www.skywest.com/<br>
                      </a><a href="http://www.aeromexico.com/">http://www.aeromexico.com/</a></font><br>
                        <a href="http://www.aerolitoral.com/">http://www.aerolitoral.com/</a><br>
                        <a href="http://www.expressjet.com/">http://www.expressjet.com/</a><br>
                        <a href="http://www.delta.com/">http://www.delta.com/</a><br>
                        <a href="http://www.comair.com/">http://www.comair.com/</a><br>
<p>                      <a href="http://www.flypinnacle.com/">http://www.flypinnacle.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:21:44 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4EC5C800-F723-43BE-BF59-2D57ADB1AB0F</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MAS de Carga - Mexico-US All-Cargo Amendment and Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="mas41212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aerotransportesmasdecarga.html">Aerotransportes MAS de Carga, S.A. de C.V.</a></strong> &nbsp;</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket/ost961249.htm">OST-1996-1249</a> - Mexico-US Scheduled All-Cargo</p>
                    <p>April 11, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/130.pdf">Amended Application for Renewal of its Exemption</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">MAS de Carga hereby submits its application for the renewal of its exemption authorizing it to perform scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between Cancun, Mexico and Miami, Florida; Mexico City, Mexico and Miami, Florida; Mexico City, Mexico and Los Angeles, California; Guadalajara, Mexico and Miami, Florida; Merida, Mexico and Miami, Florida; and Merida, Mexico and New York, New York; Mexico City and Atlanta, Georgia, and to serve Miami and Atlanta on a coterminal basis; all-cargo charters between Mexico and the United States, and other all-cargo charters in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212, as authorized under Docket <a href="/ostdocket/ost961249.htm">OST-1996-1249</a>. The last exemption granted under this Docket is in effect up to April 19, 2012.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Aerotransportes MAS de Carga, Celestino Pena, 305-856-5655</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.masair.com/">http://www.masair.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:21:12 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5340C2E6-1A6A-481B-990A-E834A23220CB</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pinnacle Airlines - US-Bahamas Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="pinnacle41212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/pinnacle.html">Pinnacle Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100139.html">OST-2010-0139</a> - Exemption - US-Bahamas</p>
                    <p>April 11, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/125.pdf">Application for Renewal of Exemption Authority</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Pinnacle Airlines applies for renewal of its exemption from 49 USC &sect; 41101, authorizing Pinnacle to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between a point or points in the United States and a point or points in the Bahamas. Pinnacle requests that this renewal authority remain in effect for a period of two years or for such longer period as the Department sees fit to grant.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Pinnacle plans to continue to operate Atlanta-Nassau scheduled service with 76-seat CRJ-900 aircraft from its existing fleet pursuant to a capacity purchase agreement with Delta Air Lines.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Garofalo Goerlich, Gary Garofalo, 202-776-3970</em></p>
                  <blockquote>
<p>                    <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flypinnacle.com/">http://www.flypinnacle.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:20:46 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">69A274FC-7063-4B3E-B2FD-6B2611435991</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>VIH Cougar Helicopters - Answer of Petroleum Helicopters / Comments of VIH Cougar Helicopters</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<br>
                    <a name="cougar41212"></a><strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc.</strong></p>
                  <p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120022.html">OST-2012-0022</a> - Submission of Aviation Consumer Protection Division Webpage On-Line Aviation Complaint Form</p>
                  <p><br>
                  </p>
                  <p>&nbsp; </p>
                  <p>April 11, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/127.pdf">Answer of <strong>Petroleum Helicopters</strong> to VIH Cougar Helicopters' Motion to Stay the Show Cause Order</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">Having apparently already obtained an informal standstill from November, 2011 to March, 2012 of the Department's further actions with respect to its tentative finding of illegal control, VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc. now seeks a further stay of these show cause proceedings while it purports to &quot;pursue&quot; certain &quot;steps&quot; it claims would correct the Department's concerns about its defective operating structure. VIH Cougar has had multiple opportunities over four years to take necessary corrective action and has so far failed to do so. In any event, nothing prevents VIH Cougar from undertaking such efforts now while the show cause proceedings move forward and presenting them for consideration by the Department as part of a fair and open proceeding.</p>
                  <p class="justified">The Department presumably issued the Order to Show Cause out of concern over foot-dragging by VIH Cougar, which has an obvious interest in delaying matters as long as possible so that it can continue to operate without consequence under its suspect ownership and control structure. The Department should not now reverse course and remove VIH Cougar's incentives to address the matter promptly, particularly given that continued delay will harm companies such as PHI which face illegal competition from VIH Cougar. Because there is no good cause for VIH Cougar's Motion to Stay, PHI respectfully submits that it should be denied.</p>
                  <p><em>Counsel: K&amp;L Gates, Jonathan Blank, 202-661-6250</em></p>
                  <p><br>
                  </p>
                  <p>April 12, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/128.pdf">Comments of <strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters</strong></a></p>
                  <p class="justified">On March 29, 2012 - nearly two weeks ago - you wrote a letter to PHI counsel about his March 23 violation of the Department's regulations and Show Cause Order, and his gaining improper access to VIH Cougar's confidential information. VIH Cougar immediately sought to have PHI counsel submit a sworn affidavit explaining in detail his version of those events.</p>
                  <p class="justified">VIH Cougar has repeated that request in subsequent letters and submissions. PHI has submitted numerous pleadings and responses since then, but still has not filed a sworn affidavit. PHI's continuing failure to provide a straightforward account in a sworn affidavit, and its unfortunate decision to engage in name-calling instead, clearly suggest that the reason no such affidavit has been forthcoming is that PHI is not able or willing to swear to what happened. In any event, PHI's unwillingness to file such an affidavit and the conflicting accounts it has given as to what transpired on March 23 make the need for a full investigation by the Department all the more imperative.</p>
                  <p class="justified">PHI's inability to explain why its violation does not justify the use of a GAO-type protective order, or how such an order would prejudice PHI, likewise confirms that there is no reason why the Department should not employ such a procedure here. Indeed, these events put the Department squarely on notice of the inadequacy of its confidentiality procedures, and impose an affirmative duty on the Department to determine exactly how and why VIH Cougar's confidential information was allowed to be compromised by a known competitor and to put enhanced safeguards in place to ensure that this does not happen again. Moreover, the Department's disclosure of VIH Cougar's confidential information to PHI, a known competitor, coupled with the fact that the Show Cause Order was issued in response to that competitor's lobbying efforts, further demonstrates why a hearing before an independent ALJ is warranted to ensure the integrity of the decision-making process in these proceedings.</p>
                  <p><em>Counsel: Dickstein Shapiro, David Nadler, 202-420-2281</em></p>
                  <p><br>
                  </p>
                  <p>Served April 12, 2012</p>
                  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/129.pdf">Notice Announcing an Extension of Time to File Answers to Objections to Order 2012-3-7</a></p>
                  <p class="justified">By <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120320.html">Order 2012-3-20</a>, issued March 30, 2012, the Department granted VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc.&rsquo;s request to suspend interim access1 to information that it has requested be withheld from public disclosure until such time as we have ruled on its motion requesting additional protective procedures for accessing the information.</p>
                  <p class="justified">On April 5, 2012, Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. filed a motion requesting that the Department extend the date for filing answers to objections to our Show Cause Order. Specifically, PHI request that the answer period be extended to 14 days after the date on which we rule on VIH Cougar&rsquo;s request for additional protective procedures. PHI states that its request is necessary because, in light of the Department&rsquo;s action suspending interim access to certain evidentiary material, it has lost at least a portion of the 14-day time period contemplated in the Show Cause Order for filing answers to objections.</p>
                  <p class="justified">On April 7, 2012, VIH Cougar filed an answer to PHI&rsquo;s motion arguing that PHI&rsquo;s request is without merit. VIH Cougar alleges that PHI accessed and viewed its confidential information without first complying with the Department&rsquo;s confidentially rules or the terms and procedures of the Show Cause Order and asserts that the Department&rsquo;s action to suspend interim access to the confidential information it provided was based on PHI&rsquo;s misconduct in this proceeding. VIH Cougar further argues that, upon investigation of the alleged misconduct, the Department may ultimately restrict PHI and/or PHI&rsquo;s counsel&rsquo;s participation in this proceeding. Therefore, VIH Cougar requests that PHI&rsquo;s motion be denied, that the proceeding be stayed pending an investigation of PHI&rsquo;s alleged misconduct, and that the date for filing answers to objections be set only after an investigation of PHI&rsquo;s alleged misconduct and the imposition of sanctions, if warranted.</p>
                  <p class="justified">On April 9, PHI filed a reply to VIH Cougar&rsquo;s answer, in which PHI argues that the parties appear to agree that the due date for answers to VIH Cougar&rsquo;s objections to <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120307.html">Order 2012-3-7</a> should be extended until 14 days after the Department allows access to both the record of this proceeding and the unredacted copies of VIH Cougar&rsquo;s pleadings.</p>
                  <p class="justified">We have reviewed the pleadings of both parties and concluded that, given the circumstances in this case, it is in the public interest to extend the deadline for the filing of answers to objections to <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120307.html">Order 2012-3-7</a> until further order of the Department.</p>
<p>                  <p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:20:19 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7490AA46-F987-4C63-BDD6-27B2C3B9AC2A</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - American - Argentina/Chile-US Codesharing with Lan Argentina Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="aa41212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/americanfilings.html">American Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0624194.html">OST-2006-24194</a> - Points in Argentina/Chile for Codesharing with Lan Argentina</p>
                    <p>Filed March 7, 2012 | Issued April 11, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/124.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal of scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between the United States and Bariloche, Cordoba, Mendoza and Rosario, Argentina, via Santiago, Chile.  American states that it uses this authority to engage in code-share services with Lan Airlines, whereby American places its &ldquo;AA*&rdquo; code on flights operated by Lan between Chile and Argentina.</p>
                    <p class="justified">Although American did not explicitly request renewal of the intermediate authority to serve Santiago, Chile, we have added it here consistent with our original grant of the subject US-Argentina authority (see Notice of Action Taken dated August 29, 2006, in the captioned docket).</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.aa.com/">http://www.aa.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:19:32 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7D6CDAD3-354B-42B1-8BA7-84D10BD9A282</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - ExpressJet - US-Belize Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="expressjet41212"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/expressjet.htm">ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2006/ost0625018.html">OST-2006-25018</a> - Exemption - US-Belize</p>
                    <p>Filed March 7, 2012 | Issued April 12, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/132.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">Renewal of scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in the United States and Belize.</p>
                    <p class="justified">ExpressJet states that although it is not presently operating on the route, it continues to provide service as a Delta Connection carrier to various Caribbean destinations and that renewal of the present authority will give it the flexibility to resume US-Belize operations as warranted.</p>
                    <blockquote>
                      <p class="smalltext">The authority for which renewal is being sought in this application was issued in the name of Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. On December 20, 2011, Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. filed an application in Docket <a href="../ostdocket2011/ost20110232.html">OST-2011-0232</a> requesting reissuance of its certificates and other economic authorities in the name &ldquo;ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.&rdquo; On January 9, 2012, DOT granted that request. <a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120103.html">Order 2012-1-3</a>. </p>
                    </blockquote>
<br />                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.expressjet.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.expressjet.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:13:17 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">19AD8905-CD40-4AEC-AE3C-3C527DEBF8DB</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IATA - Mail Vote 704 - Resolution 012</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="iata41112"></a><strong><a href="../iata/iata.html">International Air Transport Association</a></strong></p>
					<p>OST-2012-0055</p>
					<p>April 11, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/111.pdf">Application for Approval of Agreements</a></p>
					<p>Mail Vote 704 - Resolution 012<br>
					  Glossary of Terms<br>
					  Intended Effective Date 1 May 2012<br>
				    (Memo 1670)</p>
					<p><em>By: IATA, Douglas Lavin</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.iata.org/" class="smalltext">http://www.iata.org/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:21:31 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">A2817E8E-73C8-48CA-995D-2AB8218ACE3C</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>LIAT - Intra-Caribbean Renewal and Amendment (San Juan-St. Vincent-Bridgetown)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="liat41112"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/liat.htm">LIAT (1974) Limited</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket/ost983771.htm">OST-1998-3771</a> - Exemption - Puerto Rico and St. Vincent - Port-of-Spain - Dominicana</p>
                    <p>April 5, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/110.pdf">Application for Renewal and Amendment of Exemption</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">LlAT hereby applies for renewal of its exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301, which authorizes LIAT to engage in (1) scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail (a) between the coterminal points Antigua and Barbuda, Montserrat and St. Kitts and Nevis; via the intermediate points Anguilla, the British Virgin Islands and St. Maarten; and the coterminal points St. Croix, St. Thomas and San Juan, Puerto Rico; and beyond to Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic; (b) between the coterminal points Antigua and Barbuda and St. Kitts and Nevis, via the intermediate points St. Maarten and St. Lucia; and the terminal point Miami, Florida; (c) between San Juan, Puerto Rico and St. Vincent, and beyond to Port-of-Spain, Trinidad; and (d) between San Juan, Puerto Rico and Dominica; and (2) charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail pursuant to 14 CFR Part 212 of the Department's regulations. In addition, LIAT requests authority to conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between San Juan, Puerto Rico and St. Vincent, and beyond to Bridgetown, Barbados.</p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Roller &amp; Bauer, Lee Bauer, 202-331-3300</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.liatairline.com/">http://www.liatairline.com/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:20:59 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">9EE5E63E-38A9-4AC8-B05F-42EC106BD17E</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>TAM - Brazil-US Amendment</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[TAM-Linhas <a name="Aereas"></a>Aereas, S.A.</strong></p>
<p><a href="../ostdocket/ost972421.htm">OST-1997-2421</a> - Exemption - Brazil-US Scheduled Passenger</p>
<p>April 11, 2012</p>
<p><a href="../ostpdf84/122.pdf">Application for Amendment of Exemption Authority</a></p>
<p>TAM hereby seeks to amend its existing exemption authority to permit it to conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail from any point or points behind Brazil via Brazil and intermediate points to any point or points in the United States and beyond to be able to take full advantage of the bilaterally negotiated route description for airlines designated by the Government of Brazil as set-out in the Memorandum of Consultations between the United States and Brazil, dated March 19,2011. As the Department is aware, the purpose of the March 19, 2011 Memorandum of Consultations is to liberalize the aviation relationship between the U.S. and Brazil pursuant to the terms of the U.S.-Brazil Open-Skies Air Transport Agreement, which was signed on the same date but which has not yet entered into force.</p>
<p>                    <p><em>Counsel: Silverberg Goldman, Robert Silverberg, 202-944-3304</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:20:34 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4A2AA6EC-6126-40F0-9857-4EBCEE4A9C20</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>TAM, Lan Airlines, and Lan Peru - Blanket Statements of Authorization</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="TAM"></a>TAM-Linhas Aereas, S.A., Lan Airlines S.A., and Lan Peru S.A.</strong></p>
                  <p>OST-2012- Blanket Statements of Authorization</p>
                  <p>April 11, 2011</p>
                  <p><a href="../ostpdf84/121.pdf">Joint Application for Blanket Statements of Authorization</a></p>
                  <p>TAM requests a statement of authorization granting it blanket authority to display the &quot;LA&quot; designator code used by LAN Airlines and LAN Peru for their services to/from the United States in connection with foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail on flights operated by TAM between (1) any points in Brazil and any points in the United States (either non-stop or via third country intermediate points); (2) any points in Brazil; (3) any points in Brazil and points in third countries; and (4) any points in the United States and points in third countries. The specific routes on which TAM will initially display the &quot;LA&quot; designator used by LAN Airlines and LAN Peru for their services to/from the United States are described in Appendix A.</p>
                  <p>LAN Airlines requests a statement of authorization granting it blanket authority to display the &quot;JJ&quot; designator code of TAM in connection with foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail on flights operated by LAN Airlines between (1) any points in Chile and any points in the United States (either non-stop or via third country intermediate points); (2) any points in Chile; (3) any points in Chile and points in third countries; and (4) any points in the United States and points in third countries. The specific routes on which LAN Airlines will initially display the &quot;JJ&quot; designator of TAM are described in Appendix B.</p>
                  <p>LAN Peru requests a statement of authorization for blanket codeshare authority to display the &quot;JJ&quot; designator code of TAM in connection with foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail on flights operated by LAN Peru between (1) any points in Peru and any points in the United States (either non-stop or via third country intermediate points); (2) any points in Peru; (3) any points in Peru and points in third countries; and (4) any points in the United States and points in third countries. The specific routes on which LAN Peru will initially display the &quot;JJ&quot; designator of TAM are described in Appendix C.</p>
<p>                  <p><em>Counsel: Silverberg Goldman, Robert Silverberg, 202-944-3304</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:20:06 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">8F8D8F78-22AB-4E3C-93D9-08E411A5F40D</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ACT Airlines - Warsaw Agreement / Family Assistance Plan</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="act41112"></a><strong><a href="/ostcarrier/act.html">ACT Havayollari A.S. d/b/a ACT Airlines</a></strong></p>
					<p><br>
					</p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket/ost95236.htm">OST-1995-236</a> - Warsaw Liability Limitations</p>
					<p>March 28, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/118.pdf">Warsaw Agreement</a></p>
					<p><em>By: Omer Sungur</em></p>
					<p><br>
					</p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket/ost983304.htm">OST-1998-3304</a> - Family Assistance Plans</p>
					<p>March 28, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/120.pdf">Family Assistance Plan</a></p>
					<p><em>By: Omer Sungur</em></p>
					<blockquote>
<p>					  <p><a href="http://www.actairlines.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.actairlines.com/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:19:05 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1A07BEC9-C65F-4AB7-8279-9F7F3F9FD43B</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DCA Beyond-Perimeter Slots - Additional Support Letters for Virgin America / Response of Frontier Airlines</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="dca41112"></a><strong>Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Slot Exemption Proceedings</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="./ostdocket2012/ost20120029.html">OST-2012-0029</a></p>
                    <p><br>
                    </p>
                    <p>April 5, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/113.pdf">Additional Letters in Support of <strong>Virgin America</strong></a><br>
                      <span class="smalltext">Congressmen Dennis Cardoza (CA-18) and Pete Stark (CA-13), Congresswoman Laura Richardson
<br />                    (CA-37)</span></p>
                    <p><em>Counsel: Zuckert Scoutt, John Gillick, 202-973-7939</em></p>
                    <p><br>
                    </p>
                    <p>April 11, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/119.pdf">Motion for Leave to File and Response of <strong>Frontier Airlines</strong> to Second Unauthorized Filing by Southwest Airlines</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">True to form and consistent with its sense of entitlement as the largest domestic US carrier to strive to have the last word in any DOT proceeding, Southwest Airlines has once again defied the Department&rsquo;s established briefing schedule by filing a second unauthorized document. This time, Southwest regurgitates arguments it previously made in trying to convince the Department that (i) its wholly unrealistic fare proposal for DCA-AUS is consistent with &ldquo;its historic pricing philosophy&rdquo; and (ii) nonstop frequencies, services, and traffic at other &ldquo;Washington DC Area Airports&rdquo; should be disregarded in evaluating the various competing applications.</p>
<p>                    <p><em>Counsel: Hogan Lovells, Robert Cohn, 202-637-4999</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:18:37 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">054AE64E-A1EF-427C-924E-C46F23EF5F84</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, MS, Muscle Shoals, AL and Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, WV - Proposals of Air Choice One and Silver Airways</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easms41112"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg and Tupelo, Mississippi, Muscle Shoals, Alabama and Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia</strong></p>
					<p><br>
					</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket/ost007856.htm">OST-2000-7856</a> - Muscle Shoals, AL<a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080209.html"><br>
                        OST-2008-0209</a> - Greenville, MS<br>
                      <a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2001/ost0110685.htm">OST-2001-10685</a> - Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090305.html">OST-2009-0305</a> - Tupelo, MS</p>
				  <p>April 10, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/114.pdf">Proposals of <strong>Air Choice One</strong></a></p>
				  <blockquote>
				    <p>Option 1, 2-year term with discounted 4-year term option: MEM service<br>
				      Piper Navajo - 24 round-trips per week</p>
				    <p>Option 2, 2-year term with discounted 4-year term option: MEM service<br>
				      Cessna Caravan - 24 round-trips per week
<br />			        </p>
				    <p>Option 3, 2-year term with discounted 4-year term option: MEM service<br>
				      Jetstream (8 seats) - 24 round-trips per week / Jetstream (18 seats) - 18 round-trips per week</p>
				    <p>Option 4, 2-year term with discounted 4-year term option: MEM service<br>
				      Jetstream (8 seats) - 24 round-trips per week / Jetstream (18 seats) - 18 round-trips per week</p>
				    <p>Option 5, 2-year term with discounted 4-year term option: ATL/MEM service<br>
				      Jetstream (8 seats) - 24 round-trips per week / Jetstream (18 seats) - 18 round-trips per week</p>
				    <p>Option 6, 2-year term with discounted 4-year term option: MEM service<br>
				      Navajo - 24 round-trips per week  / Jetstream (18 seats) - 18 round-trips per week
<br />			        </p>
			      </blockquote>
<br />				  <p><em>By: Air Choice One, Shane Storz, 866-435-8527</em></p>
				  <p><br>
				  </p>
				  <p><a href="/ostdocket/ost007856.htm">OST-2000-7856</a> - Muscle Shoals, AL<a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080209.html"><br>
OST-2008-0209</a> - Greenville, MS<br>
<a href="http://airlineinfo.com/ostdocket2001/ost0110685.htm">OST-2001-10685</a> - Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS<br>
<a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090305.html">OST-2009-0305</a> - Tupelo, MS<a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0315553.html"><br>
        OST-2003-15553</a> - Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, WV</p>
				  <p>April 10, 2012</p>
				  <p><a href="/ostpdf84/115.pdf">Proposals of <strong>Silver Airways</strong></a></p>
				  <p>36 weekly frequencies between Greenville, MS and Atlanta, GA</p>
				  <p>36 weekly frequencies between Tupelo, MS and Atlanta, GA</p>
				  <p>24 weekly frequencies between Muscle Shoals, AL and Atlanta, GA</p>
				  <p>24 weekly frequencies between Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS and Atlanta, GA</p>
				  <p>24 weekly frequencies between Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, WV and Atlanta, GA (Nov. 1-Apr. 30)</p>
				  <p>26 weekly frequencies between Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, WV and Atlanta, GA (May 1-Oct. 31)</p>
				  <p class="justified">Silver Airways is also pursuing what has been termed a &ldquo;close Interline Relationship&rdquo; with Delta Airlines. Similar to the agreement recently reached between Great Lakes Airlines and Delta Airlines in the Minneapolis hub, this &ldquo;close Interline&rdquo; relationship would allow connecting itineraries involving Silver Airways and Delta Airlines to appears on the Delta.com website.</p>
				  <p><em>By: Silver Airways, Mickey Bowman</em></p>
				  <p>&nbsp;</p>
				  <blockquote>
				    <p><span class="smalltext"><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flytupelo.com/">http://www.flytupelo.com/</a> - Tupelo Regional Airport</font><br>
				      <a href="http://www.greenville.ms.us/Airport.html">http://www.greenville.ms.us/Airport.html</a> - Mid-Delta Regional Airport<br>
				      <a href="http://www.hlrairport.com/">http://www.hlrairport.com/</a> - Hattiesburg/Laurel Regional Airport<br>
			        <a href="http://www.flytheshoals.com/">http://www.flytheshoals.com/</a> - Northwest Alabama Regional Airport<br>
<p>			        <font size="-1"><a href="http://www.lewisburg-wv.com/">http://www.lewisburg-wv.com/</a> - Greenbrier Valley Airport</font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:18:06 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">CB2E09CC-8D93-4033-9BF3-A9B72A4A012B</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>People Express Airlines - Letter in Support of Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="people41112"></a><strong>People Express Airlines, Inc.</strong></p>
                    <p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120042.html">OST-2012-0042</a> - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - Interstate Scheduled</p>
                    <p>April 9, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/112.pdf">Letter in Support of <strong>Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport</strong></a></p>
                    <p class="justified">I am writing in favor of the application filed by People Express Airlines, Inc. for a certificate of public convenience and necessity.</p>
                    <p class="justified">On behalf of the Peninsula Airport Commission (owners and operators of the Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport - PHF), we welcome the opportunity to work with People Express Airlines.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Newport News/Williamsburg Int'l Airport, Ken Spirito</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><a href="http://www.flypex.com" class="smalltext">http://www.flypex.com</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:17:16 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">A4D29DC5-6D28-4A46-AAE1-BAED9667197B</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Croatia Airlines - Croatia-US Codeshare with United Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="croatia41112"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/croatia.html">Croatia Airlines</a></strong></p>
                    <p><a href="/ostdocket2007/ost0728896.html">OST-2007-28896</a> - Exemption - Croatia-US Codeshare with United</p>
                    <p>Filed March 16, 2012 | Issued April 11, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/117.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">(1) Renew exemption from 49 USC &sect; 41301 to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail from points behind Croatia, via Croatia and any intermediate points, to any point or points in the United States and beyond pursuant to code-share agreements with United Air Lines Inc. and Scandinavian Airlines System; and (2) amend that exemption to the extent necessary to allow the applicant to conduct such codeshare services with any duly authorized US or foreign air carrier.                    </p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.croatiaairlines.hr/">http://www.croatiaairlines.hr/</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:16:49 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">F1EBF087-0C6B-4D5A-8207-9824B9817AD2</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Premium Jet - Renewing Exemption and Show Cause (Switzerland-US Charters)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="premium41112"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/premiumjet.html">Premium Jet AG</a></strong></p>
                    <p>Order 2012-4-14<br>
                    <a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090351.html">OST-2009-0351</a> - Exemption - Switzerland-US Passenger Charters</p>
                    <p>Issued and Served April 11, 2012</p>
                    <p><a href="/ostpdf84/116.pdf">Order Renewing Exemption and to Show Cause</a></p>
                    <p class="justified">We grant the request of Premium Jet AG for renewal and amendment of its exemption under 49 USC &sect;40109 to permit it to engage in: 1) foreign charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail from points behind Switzerland via Switzerland and intermediate points to a point or points in the United States and beyond; and 2) other charters pursuant to the prior approval requirements set forth in the Department&rsquo;s regulations governing charters.</p>
                    <p class="justified">With respect to the applicant&rsquo;s request for a foreign air carrier permit in this proceeding, we direct all interested persons to show cause why our tentative decision on that application, set forth above, should not be made final. Any interested person objecting to the issuance of an order making final our tentative findings and conclusions with respect to the applicant&rsquo;s request for a foreign air carrier permit shall, no later than twenty-one calendar days after the date of service of this order, file with the Department.</p>
                    <p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
                    <blockquote>
<p>                      <p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.premiumjet.eu/">http://www.premiumjet.eu/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:16:12 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7020189B-B5C0-4E4A-9E31-F800C67BA6D1</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Baker's Bay Associates - Indirect Foreign Air Transportation (White Plains-Treasure Cay)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="bakers41012"></a><strong>Baker's Bay Associates, LLC</strong></p>
					<p>OST-2012-0053 - Exemption - Indirect Foreign Air Transportation</p>
					<p>April 6, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/99.pdf">Application for an Exemption</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Baker's Bay Associates is proposing to contract with one or more US or foreign direct air carriers to provide transportation of the members of its subsidiary, Baker's Bay Golf &amp; Ocean Club, LLC between White Plains, New York and Treasure Cay, Bahamas, to provide members access to their vacation homes at the Club's private resort community on Great Guana Cay.</p>
					<p class="justified">The requested relief is very similar to the exemption granted to The Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC, last month (<a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120201.html">Order 2012-2-1</a>), which permitted the club to offer air transportation to its members for travel to their vacation homes in the Club's private resort community near Big Sky, Montana. That order was based on the exemption granted in 2004 to Kona Associates (<a href="../ostdocket2004/order040808.html">Order 2004-8-8</a>), permitting operation of a shuttle for its members between Oakland, California and Kailua Kona, Hawaii, where their vacation homes were located -- in three exclusive communities operated in conjunction with Kona Associates. In fact, both of these programs were initiated by Discovery Land Company, the co-owner of Yellowstone, the manager of one of the communities involved in the Kona Shuttle program, and a part-owner of Baker's Bay.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Cozen O'Connor, Mark Atwood, 202-463-2513</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:51:46 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">0AB84E68-777F-47E8-B1A2-737984C50F2F</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tyrolean Airways - Intra-European Codesharing with United</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="tyrolean41012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/tyroleanairways.htm">Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt GesmbH</a></strong></p>
					<p>OST-2012-0054 - Statement of Authorization - Intra-European Codesharing with United</p>
					<p>April 10, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/100.pdf">Application for a Statement of Authorization</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Tyrolean is currently operating certain flights within Europe on behalf of Brussels Airlines NV/SA pursuant to a wet-lease agreement. In addition, Brussels and United Airlines, Inc. hold authority from the Department to engage in code-sharing on a reciprocal basis pursuant to a codeshare agreement between the two carriers 4 In order to further implement the United/Brussels codeshare arrangement, Tyrolean hereby requests that the Department grant it a statement of authorization to display United's &quot;UA&quot; designator code on flights operated by Tyrolean within the European Union or European Common Aviation Area countries and beyond to any point or points in conjunction with services held out by United between the United States and the EU or ECAA countries and beyond to any point or points (either non-stop or via third country intermediate points), including flights operated by Tyrolean pursuant to its wet-lease arrangement with Brussels.</p>
					<p class="justified">Tyrolean will transport United passengers on aircraft wet-leased to Brussels over the following routes: from Brussels, Belgium on one hand, to the following destinations on the other hand:</p>
					<blockquote>
						<p class="justified">Malaga, Spain; Athens, Greece; Barcelona, Spain; Birmingham, UK; Bilbao, Spain; Bologna, Italy; Stockholm, Sweden; Bristol, UK; Budapest, Hungary; Paris, France; Copenhagen, Denmark; Catania, Italy; Moscow, Russia; Faro, Portugal; Rome, Italy; Florence, Italy; Gothenburg, Sweden; Geneva, Switzerland; Hanover, Germany; Hamburg, Germany; Krakow, Poland; London, UK; Milan, Italy; Lisbon, Portugal; Madrid, Spain; Manchester, UK; Marseille, France; Naples, Italy; Nice, France; Newcastle, UK; Oporto, Portugal; Oslo, Norway; Prague, Czech Republic; Sevilla, Spain; Strasbourg , France; Toulouse, France; Turin, Italy; Berlin , Germany; Venice, Italy; Vienna, Austria; Vilnius, Lithuania; Warsaw, Poland.</p>
					</blockquote>
<br />					<p><em>Counsel: Lufthansa, Arthur Molins, 516-296-9234</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p><a href="http://www.tyrolean.at/" class="smalltext">http://www.tyrolean.at/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:51:02 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">E81C87F9-29F8-48C1-BA5A-1AA32D510C43</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Baltia - Request for Expedited Certification (New York-St. Petersburg)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="baltia41012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/baltia.html">Baltia Air Lines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2007/ost070007.html">OST-2007-0007</a> - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - New York-St. Petersburg</p>
					<p>April 6, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/104.pdf">Request for Expedited Certification</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Baltia has been in certification for over three years, a process that prior to the new certification system took around a year. I am writing to request your support in expediting our certification. The issues raised in this letter cannot be resolved at the FSDO or the AFS 900 levels alone.</p>
					<p class="justified">Much time has been spent unproductively just waiting, and millions of dollars have been spent to sustain the process. There is a lack of consideration for our time and capital. Our B747 is sitting idle after heavy maintenance. We have been able to stay the course financially because we own our aircraft and we are fortunate to have a dedicated staff and an investor base committed to our success. This cannot go on indefinitely.</p>
					<p><em>By: Igor Dmitrowsky</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p><a href="http://www.baltia.com/http://www.baltia.com/" class="smalltext">http://www.baltia.com/</a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:50:36 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">87D1F8C6-F6E5-4DFA-A462-DCA00407C850</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DCA Beyond-Perimeter Slots Proceedings - Motion to Strike of Alaska Air</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="dca41012"></a><strong>Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Slot Exemption Proceedings</strong></p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket2012/ost20120029.html">OST-2012-0029</a></p>
					<p>April 10, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/108.pdf">Motion for Leave to File and Motion to Strike of <strong>Alaska Airlines</strong></a></p>
					<p class="justified">Since March 27, no fewer than four &ldquo;supplements&rdquo; and &ldquo;responses&rdquo; have been filed in this docket by Sun Country, Southwest, Frontier and jetBlue. None of these supplemental filings were authorized by the Department&rsquo;s Notice instituting this case, and none of them add anything of substance to the record. Instead, the supplemental filings are duplicative of arguments made previously in comments submitted on March 27, and contain replies to the March 27 comments of other applicants. Regardless of the content, the Department should not entertain supplemental substantive pleadings in an expedited case such as this one. The Department was given only ninety days from passage of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act on February 14, 2012, to render its final decision in this case. The Department and its staff should not be burdened with the unprecedented and seemingly unending submission of multiple late comments cast in the form of supplemental pleadings. Each applicant had an opportunity to submit its comments on March 27, and there is no justification for allowing the submission of further unauthorized substantive pleadings.</p>
					<p class="justified">Alaska has not&#151;and will not&#151;submit supplemental pleadings reiterating its March 27 comments or in reply to arguments raised by other applicants. Instead, Alaska will limit any supplemental filings to the submission of supporting letters as all applicants should and as has occurred in all previous beyond-perimeter slot proceedings. Alaska therefore moves the Department to strike the supplemental pleadings of Sun Country, Frontier, Southwest and jetBlue, and any additional supplemental pleadings filed by any party to this proceeding that consist of anything other than letters and statements of support.</p>
<p>					<p><em>Counsel: Squire Sanders, Marshall Sinick, 202-626-6651</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:49:43 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">A28D5371-D314-49CA-9DCB-FF265B06F1FF</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Beckley, Clarksburg/Fairmont and Morgantown, WV - DOT Request for Community Comments</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="easbeckley41012"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Beckley, Clarksburg/Fairmont and Morgantown, West Virginia</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost972761.htm">OST-1997-2761</a> - Beckley<br>
						<a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0520736.html">OST-2005-20736</a> - Clarksburg/Fairmont<br>
						<a href="/ostdocket2005/ost0520735.html">OST-2005-20735</a> - Morgantown</p>
					<p>April 4, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/105.pdf"><strong>DOT</strong> Request for Community Comments</a></p>
					<p class="justified">For Morgantown and Clarksburg, Silver proposes 18 nonstop or one-stop round trips per week to Washington Dulles International Airport for an annual combined subsidy of $3,456,250. Flights would stop in either Morgantown or Clarksburg en route to or from Dulles. For Beckley, Silver proposes 13 round trips per week (7 nonstops and 6 one-stops at an intermediate point to be determined at a later date) to Dulles for an annual subsidy of $2,664,565. The service proposed is one additional round trip per week more than what the Department requested for Beckley. As result, in its proposal, Silver &quot;would be amenable&quot; to providing 12 round trips at a <em>pro rata</em> subsidy adjustment. All service to the three communities would be operated with 34-passenger Saab 340B+ aircraft. Silver states that it is proposing to operate flights under its existing codeshare with United Airlines, however, a definitive agreement had not been reached at the time of filing and, therefore, the proposal is contingent upon that agreement being finalized. We are currently reviewing Silver's compensation requirement.</p>
					<p><em>By: Dennis DeVany</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p class="smalltext"><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.flybeckley.com/">http://www.flybeckley.com/</a> - Raleigh County Memorial Airport</font><br>
							<a href="http://www.flymov.com/">http://www.flymov.com/</a> - Mid-Ohio Valley Regional Airport<br>
							<a href="http://www.morgantownairport.com/">http://www.morgantownairport.com/</a> - Morgantown Municipal Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:48:59 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">289CCB20-FFBC-4433-9E30-45C8F55FAAAF</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>VIH Cougar Helicopters - Reply of VIH Cougar Helicopters in Support of Motion to Withhold Information from Public Disclosure / Answer of VIH Cougar Helicopters to PHI's Motion to Extend Time for Answers to Objections / Reply of Petroleum Helicopters in Support of Motion to Extend Time for Answers</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="cougar41012"></a><strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc.</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120022.html">OST-2012-0022</a> - Submission of Aviation Consumer Protection Division Webpage On-Line Aviation Complaint Form<br>
					</p>
					<p>&nbsp;</p>
					<p>April 5, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/101.pdf">Reply of <strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters</strong> in Support of Motion to Withhold Information from Public Disclosure</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Regardless of PHI's counsel's assertions, it is undisputed that on March 29, 2012, the Department instructed that PHI counsel &quot;immediately file (or refile)&quot; his alleged March 23 affidavit (which would not have been necessary if the Department had any record of receiving it on March 23 as counsel claims). Further, counsel's affidavit was not actually filed on the www.regulations.gov site until April 2, 2012, and counsel did nothing to verify whether his affidavit was in fact on file before accessing VIH Cougar confidential documents almost two weeks earlier on March 23. It was incumbent on PHI counsel, not the Department and not VIH Cougar, to ensure that all procedures were properly followed before VIH Cougar confidential information was accessed and reviewed.</p>
					<p class="justified">PHI's claim that VIH Cougar has not shown that the documents in question are confidential has no foundation. VIH Cougar's objection brief and its brief filed on March 16, 2012 complied with Department Rule 12, and specifically identified why public disclosure of the information would adversely affect the interests of VIH Cougar. PHI, on the other hand, fails to explain why the documents are not confidential. And, it hardly could, as it has never seen the confidential information submitted on April 2, 2012 and claims to have had only a brief non-substantive look at the confidential information previously submitted and identified in VIH Cougar's March 16 Rule 12 Motion.</p>
					<p class="justified">There likewise is no basis for PHI to claim that the agreements between VIH Cougar and VIH Group have &quot;limited if any commercial interest,&quot; to them or were used to set up a &quot;fronting operation.&quot; This PHI claim is just the latest spurious allegation manufactured by a competitor who has shown no compunction about disregarding the Department's own rules to gain a competitive advantage.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Dickstein Shapiro, David Nadler, 202-420-2200</em></p>
					<p><br>
					</p>
					<p>April 6, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/102.pdf">Answer of <strong>VIH Cougar Helicopters</strong> to PHI's Motion to Extend Time for Answers to Objections</a></p>
					<p class="justified">PHI argues that because it is being denied access to VIH Cougar's confidential information, including the unredacted pleadings in these proceedings, it has lost at least a portion of the 14-day period contemplated in the Show Cause Order for filing an Answer to VIH Cougar's Objections. PHI says that justifies the Department extending the time for filing of such answers to 14 days after the date on which the Department allows access to that confidential information. There is no basis for such an extension.</p>
					<p class="justified">What PHI fails to mention in its Motion is that it is being denied access to VIH Cougar's confidential information because of its own misconduct: it not only accessed but reviewed VIH Cougar confidential information without first complying with the Department's confidentiality rules or the terms and conditions of the Show Cause Order. When the Department learned of these violations, it immediately notified the parties, and promptly took interim steps in order to protect VIH Cougar information against any further unauthorized dissemination of its proprietary information pending further action by the Department.</p>
					<p class="justified">Any alleged &quot;delay&quot; thus far has occurred only because PHI counsel did not comply with the Department's rules and access protocols regarding a direct competitor's confidential business information. The Department must now investigate those violations, fashion appropriate remedies for them, and put in place additional safeguards to restore integrity to these proceedings and ensure that VIH Cougar's confidential information will be protected. PHI should not be allowed to profit from its own misconduct by obtaining an extension of time to remedy a &quot;delay&quot; that it itself caused.</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: Dickstein Shapiro, David Nadler, 202-420-2200</em></p>
					<p>&nbsp;</p>
					<p>&nbsp;</p>
					<p>April 9, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/103.pdf">Reply of <strong>Petroleum Helicopters</strong> in Support of Motion to Extend Time for Answers</a></p>
					<p class="justified">VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc. does not take issue with the only matter of substance in the motion of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. for an extension of the time answer VIH Cougar's objections to the Department's Order to Show Cause until 14 days after the date on which the Department allows access to the record of this proceeding and to unredacted copies of VIH Cougar's pleadings. VIH Cougar thus concedes, by its silence on the point, that it would make little sense for PHI to prepare a response without having access to this information. There is indisputably, therefore, good cause for the motion and it should be granted.</p>
					<p class="justified">VIH Cougar cannot just acknowledge this obvious fact, however, because its goal is to delay and complicate these proceedings. VIH Cougar has formally sought such delay via a motion for stay, but has also sought to delay these proceedings informally by raising bogus claims of a confidentiality breach and false charges of misconduct. Such delays will, of course, allow VIH Cougar to continue to operate illegally, while forestalling full inquiry into the arrangements by which the Canadian-licensed lawyer for the Canadian-controlled VIH Group has been established as the owner and putative operator of a supposedly independent US company that is, by all appearances, entirely dependent for its existence on VIH Group. VIH Cougar's desire to delay further inquiry into these arrangements is understandable, but that does not make it any less improper.</p>
<p>					<p><em>Counsel: K&amp;L Gates, Jonathan Blank, 202-661-6250</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:48:07 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">A99E17D5-0A53-46AE-ADB0-6112118B9847</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Aeronaves - Mexican Taxi Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="aeronaves41012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/aeronaves.htm">Aeronaves TSM, S.A de C.V.</a></strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket/ost995804.htm">OST-1999-5804</a> - Exemption - Mexican Taxi</p>
					<p>Filed February 16, 2012 | Issued April 10, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/109.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Renewal of exemption for two years from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to conduct passenger charter operations between Mexico and the United States, and other passenger charters in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212, using small equipment. The applicant also requests renewal of its stopover privileges and continued relief from the requirement to provide advance notice of each flight, or series of flights, between Mexico and the United States.</p>
					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.aeronavestsm.com/">http://www.aeronavestsm.com/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:47:28 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1F5AA2B8-E230-46EC-95D1-3397FB1D9A7B</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NOAT - Lanco - Colombia-Miami All-Cargo Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="lanco41012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/lacc.html">Linea Aerea Carguera de Colombia, S.A.</a></strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090038.html">OST-2009-0038</a> - Exemption - Colombia-Miami All-Cargo</p>
					<p>Filed March 20, 2012 | Issued April 9, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/97.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Renewal of exemption from 49 USC &sect;41301 to permit the applicant to conduct: 1) scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between any point or points in Colombia, on the one hand, and Miami, Florida, Los Angeles, California and Houston, Texas, on the other hand, via intermediate points; and 2) all-cargo charter operations in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212. The applicant requests that the authority be granted for a two-year term.</p>
					<p class="justified">The one-year duration of the authority we granted is consistent with our usual policy of granting exemption authority in the circumstances presented. Therefore, we dismissed the application to the extent that it sought authority for a longer period.</p>
					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:47:02 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">33D7B73E-9AD4-4A73-8B8C-82E7338581CA</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Air Atlanta Icelandic - Granting Exemption and Show Cause (EU-US Open-Skies)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="airatlanta41012"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/airatlanticicelandic.htm">Air Atlanta Icelandic</a></strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-4-12<a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110171.html"><br>
							OST-2011-0171</a> - Exemption and Foreign Air Carrier Permit - EU-US Open-Skies</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 10, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/106.pdf">Order Granting Exemption to Show Cause</a></p>
					<p class="justified">We grant the request of Air Atlanta Icelandic for an exemption under 49 USC &sect;40109 for the services:</p>
					<ul>
						<li class="justified">foreign scheduled air transportation of persons, property and mail between points behind Iceland, via Iceland and intermediate points, and any point or points in the United States, and beyond;
<br />						<li class="justified">foreign scheduled and charter air transportation of persons, property and mail from any point or points behind any Member State of the European Union, via any point or points in any Member State and via intermediate points to any point or points in the United States and beyond;
<br />						<li class="justified">foreign scheduled and charter air transportation of persons, property and mail between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in any member of the European Common Aviation Area;
<br />						<li class="justified">foreign scheduled and charter air transportation of cargo between any point or points in the United States and any other point or points;
<br />						<li class="justified">other charters pursuant to the prior approval requirements set forth in 14 CFR Part 212 of the Department&rsquo;s regulations; and
<br />						<li class="justified">transportation authorized by any additional route rights made available to European Union carriers under the Agreement in the future.
<br />					</ul>
					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p><a href="http://www.atlanta.is/" class="smalltext"><font size="-1">http://www.atlanta.is/</font></a></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:46:32 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">D10EE72F-B2EC-4793-816C-459C6DA27459</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Excursion Inlet and Kake, AK - Requesting Proposals</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="easak41012"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Excursion Inlet and Kake, Alaska</strong></p>
					<p>Order 2012-4-13<br>
						<a href="../ostdocket2002/ost0212014.htm">OST-2002-12014</a> - Excursion Inlet<br>
						<a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080217.html">OST-2008-0217</a> - Kake</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 10, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/107.pdf">Order Requesting Proposals</a></p>
					<p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing Essential Air Service at Excursion Inlet and Kake, Alaska, for a new rate term beginning September 1, 2012, with or without subsidy. Proposals are due by May 8, 2012.</p>
					<p class="justified">For Excursion Inlet, we are requesting proposals for status-quo service of three round trips a week to Juneau during the peak season and one round trip a week during off-peak season with 10-passenger or less aircraft, or comparable capacity levels. For Kake, we are requesting status-quo service of 14 round trips per week to Juneau during peak season and 7 round trips a week during off-peak season using 10-seat or less aircraft, or comparable capacity levels.</p>
					<p><em>By: Todd Homan</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p class="smalltext"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excursion_Inlet_Seaplane_Base">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excursion_Inlet_Seaplane_Base</a> - Excursion Inlet Seaplane Base<br>
							<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kake_Airport">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kake_Airport</a> - Kake Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:46:06 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2AB426E0-FED0-419C-B06B-C2CA821A049F</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>United - Request to Convert Remaining US-Russia Year-Round Frequencies to Seasonal Use</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="united4612"></a><strong><a href="../ostcarrier/unitedfilings.html">United Air Lines, Inc.</a></strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2008/ost080157.html">OST-2008-0157</a> - Frequency Allocation - US-Russia</p>
					<p>April 6, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/79.pdf">Request of <strong>United Air Lines</strong> to Convert Remaining US-Russia Year-Round Frequencies to Year-Round</a></p>
					<p class="justified">United requests the Department to further amend Notice of Action Taken dated May 23, 2008 as amended by Notice of Action Taken dated September 1, 2009, to convert United&rsquo;s remaining three US-Russia year-round frequencies to seasonal use. United intends to operate Moscow service on a summer seasonal basis, and it will monitor market conditions to adjust future capacity as demand warrants.</p>
					<p class="justified">The Department has granted other carrier&rsquo;s requests to convert US-Russia and other year-round frequencies to seasonal use. See, e.g., Department Approval dated July 7, 2009 in Docket <a href="../ostdocket2005/ost0520116.html">OST-2005-20116</a> (converting Delta&rsquo;s four remaining year-round Atlanta-Moscow frequencies to seasonal use) and Notice of Action Taken dated June 18, 2008 in docket <a href="../ostdocket2007/ost0728567.html">OST-2007-28567</a> (approving Delta&rsquo;s request to convert two Atlanta-Shanghai frequencies into seasonal frequencies).</p>
					<p><em>Counsel: United, Dan Weiss, 312-997-7573</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.united.com/">http://www.united.com/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:13:50 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2737DDF2-4735-4242-B640-56B6E11E8CE4</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DCA Beyond-Perimeter Slots - Response of jetBlue to Unauthorized Filing by Southwest</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="dca4612"></a><strong>Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Slot Exemption Proceedings</strong></p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2012/ost20120029.html">OST-2012-0029</a></p>
					<p>April 6, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/80.pdf">Motion for Leave to File and Response of <strong>jetBlue Airways</strong> to Unauthorized Filing by Southwest Airlines</a></p>
					<p>I<span class="justified">n its Limited Response, Southwest states that jetBlue wrongly assumed that its stimulation estimates were for round trip passengers. Upon consideration of Southwest's submission, jetBlue still believes its assumption was reasonable. Southwest projects overall market stimulation of 91,806 passengers on the DCA-AUS route and an additional 54,276 passengers in the DCA-SAN route, while jetBlue estimated that it would stimulate traffic of 36,500 on its own flights on the DCA-AUS route. When jetBlue analyzed the difference between its own estimate of traffic stimulation and Southwest's estimate, the Southwest estimate was so high that it was not credible.</span></p>
					<p class="justified">DOT must consider the relative benefits to consumers from each carrier's proposal. Southwest's overly optimistic claims about traffic stimulation cannot be given any weight. Moreover, Southwest's concern about jetBlue's use of smaller aircraft in the market reflects the shortcoming of their own fleet choice which prohibits right sizing aircraft as a carrier enters a new market and then, as jetBlue stated, substituting larger aircraft as the. market grows.</p>
<p>					<p><em>Counsel: Dow Lohnes, Jonathan Hill, 202-776-2000</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:13:16 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1023E347-CDF0-49BF-B095-FE8E9EAAF159</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Alaska Air - Los Angeles-Guadalajara Renewal / San Diego-Puerto Vallarta Renewal</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="alaska4612"></a><b><a href="../ostcarrier/alaskafilings.html">Alaska Airlines, Inc.</a></b><br>
					</p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0314542.htm">OST-2003-14542</a> - Exemption - Los Angeles-Guadalajara</p>
					<p>Filed March 6, 2012 | Issued April 5, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/76.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Renewal of scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Los Angeles, California and Guadalajara, Mexico.</p>
					<p class="justified">Alaska advised the Department informally that it continues to use this authority to provide service with its own-aircraft and by placing its designator code on the flights of Delta Air Lines, Inc. See Notice of Action Taken dated May 13, 2010, in the captioned docket.</p>
					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
					<p>&nbsp;</p>
					<p>&nbsp;</p>
					<p><a href="/ostdocket2010/ost20100103.html">OST-2010-0103</a> - Exemption - San Diego-Puerto Vallarta</p>
					<p>Filed March 5, 2012 | Issued April 5, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/75.pdf">Notice of Action Taken</a></p>
					<p class="justified">Renewal of scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between San Diego, California and Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.</p>
					<p class="justified">Alaska states that it uses this authority to provide seasonal service in the market.</p>
					<p><em>By: Paul Gretch</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p><font size="-1"><a href="http://alaskaairlines.com/">http://alaskaairlines.com/</a></font></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:12:33 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">BB8FD8DA-FD14-4473-9443-E9C2CF2F58D2</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at Chisholm/Hibbing, MN and Escanaba, Pellston and Sault Ste. Marie, MI - Selecting Carrier (Delta)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a name="easchisholm4612"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at Chisholm/Hibbing, Minnesota and Escanaba, Pellston and Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan</strong></p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120410.html">Order 2012-4-10</a><a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0315796.html"><br>
							OST-2003-15796</a> - Chisholm/Hibbing, MN<br>
						<a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0315128.html">OST-2003-15128</a> - Escanaba, MI<br>
						<a href="/ostdocket2011/ost20110133.html">OST-2011-0133</a> - Pellston, MI<br>
						<a href="/ostdocket2009/ost090303.html">OST-2009-0303</a> - Sault St. Marie, MI</p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 6, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/78.pdf">Order Selecting Carrier</a></p>
					<p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is selecting Delta Air Lines, Inc. to provide essential air service at Chisholm/Hibbing, Minnesota, and Escanaba, Pellston, and Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, for $2,517,770, $2,833,558, $1,055,361, and $1,676,136, respectively. At Pellston, the service is to consist of 12 nonstop round trips per week to Detroit in the off-peak, and 14 per week in the peak period. At Sault Ste. Marie, the service will be 13 round trips per week year round. At the remaining two communities, service is to consist of 12 nonstop round trips per week year round. All service is to be operated with 50-seat CRJ-200 aircraft.</p>
					<p><em>By: Susan Kurland</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.deltacountymi.org/airport.php/">http://www.deltacountymi.org/airport.php/</a> - Delta County Airport<br>
								<a href="http://www.pellstonairport.com/">http://www.pellstonairport.com/</a> - Pellston Regional Airport<br>
								<a href="http://www.saultairport.com/">http://www.saultairport.com/</a> - Sault Ste. Marie Airport</font><br>
<p>							<font size="-1"><a href="http://www.rangeregionalairport.com/">http://www.rangeregionalairport.com/</a> - Range Regional Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:11:47 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">CBA51094-DC05-4F6A-9B0C-E5F9A6A59F7D</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EAS at West Yellowstone, MT - Selecting Carrier (SkyWest)</title>
            <link>http://airlineinfo.com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="easwestyellow4612"></a><strong>Essential Air Service at West Yellowstone, Montana</strong></p>
					<p><a href="../ostdocket2012/order20120409.html">Order 2012-4-9</a><br>
						<a href="/ostdocket2003/ost0314626.htm">OST-2003-14626</a></p>
					<p>Issued and Served April 6, 2012</p>
					<p><a href="/ostpdf84/77.pdf">Order Selecting Carrier</a></p>
					<p class="justified">By this Order, the Department is selecting SkyWest Airlines to continue to provide Essential Air Service at West Yellowstone, Montana, at an annual subsidy rate of $389,412, for the next summer season from June 1 through September 30, 2012.</p>
					<p><em>By: Susan Kurland</em></p>
					<blockquote>
						<p class="smalltext"><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.yellowstoneairport.org/">http://www.yellowstoneairport.org/</a></font> - Yellowstone Airport</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:10:52 -0700</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">9FD7AE65-5D43-49A2-BE41-847A442F9281</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
