Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day


OST-99-5061

Allocation of Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

OST-99-5061 Posted and Served February 1, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Notice Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

In view of the need for a timely decision to permit the most effective use of our bilateral opportunities, we intend to act quickly to allocate the frequencies in time for the 1999 summer season.  In the interest of developing a complete record for this allocation, we will require American and United to submit, at a minimum, the following information:

By:  Paul Gretch


Allocation of Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

OST-99-5061 February 8, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Submission of American Airlines Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies
    Attachments:  1998/1999 Summer Season  

American seeks 67 additional frequencies for the 1999 summer season. Combined with American's minimum entitlement of 886 frequencies, that will provide 953 frequencies, and allow American to operate four daily nonstop roundtrips between Chicago ants London (Heathrow) for the entire summer season (April 1 - October 31), as well as one daily nonstop roundtrip between Chicago and London (Gatwick) for the period June   -September  using MD-11 aircraft

Counsel:  American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647, carl_nelson@amrcorp.com

OST-99-5061 February 8, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Application of United Air Lines for Allocation of Additional Chicago-London Combination Frequencies Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies
    Service List  

United's minimum entitlement of 488 round-trip frequencies for the 1999 Summer Season would be used to operate double daily service throughout the season and to add one additional daily service from July 1, 1999 through August 29, 1999. The minimum entitlement would be operated with B-777 aircraft with a total of 292 seats (12 first, 49 business and 231 coach).  United would use the 67 additional Summer Season frequencies to extend its triple daily service for a longer portion of the summer -- from May 1, 1999 through September 4, 1999. The aircraft for these additional services would also be B-777, in the same configuration described above. These services would be offered from Chicago's O'Hare Airport to London's Heathrow Airport.

Counsel:  United and Kirkland Ellis, Jeffrey Manley, 202-879-5161, jeffrey_manley@kirkland.com


Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

OST-99-5061 February 12, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Answer of American Airlines Allocation of Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies document.gif (123 bytes)HTML

United proposes service only to Heathrow. While Heathrow is the preferred London airport for many itineraries, Gatwick is the preferred airport for other itineraries, particularly for passengers who work or reside close to Gatwick; who prefer the ground transportation available at Gatwick to Central London; and who require connections to or from destinations that: are not served via Heathrow. By serving both Heathrow and Gatwick, American will provide additional travel options that will not be available from United's exclusive Heathrow service.  The Department should promptly conclude this proceeding by awarding 67 additional Chicago-London frequencies to American for the 1999 summer season.

Counsel:   American, Carl Nelson, Jr., 202.496.5647, carl_nelson@amrcorp.com

OST-99-5061 February 12, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Answer of United Air Lines Allocation of Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
    Exhibit UA-1:  Even if All Extra Frequencies Went to United, AA Would Still Have 60% More than UA    
    Exhibit UA-2:  Even if All 67 Extra Frequencies Went to United, AA Would Still Have 20% More Seats than UA    

The Department's policy and precedent represented by these past allocation proceedings fully support grant of United's request for all available frequencies and denial of American's application. To award any frequencies to American would increase that carrier's dominance of the Chicago-London market contrary to the Department's efforts to eliminate such dominance through the frequency application process. Granting American's application would strengthen that carrier's position as the dominant carrier allowing it to operate in excess of four daily frequencies (953 for the season) against United's operation of only three daily frequencies on nearly half the days of the summer season (137). Particularly where, as here, American has a marketing alliance with the only foreign carrier in the market where frequencies are to be allocated, there is no reason to depart from past precedent to favor American with any allocation beyond its minimum entitlements American offers in its smaller aircraft because of the enormous frequency advantage American possesses.

Counsel:  United and Kirkland Ellis, Jeffrey Manley, 202-879-5161, jeffrey_manley@kirkland.com


Allocation of Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

Order 99-3-20
OST-99-5061
Issued and Served March 23, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Order to Show Cause

Scanned Version

Allocation of Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

By this order we tentatively allocate 67 round-trip frequencies to United Air Lines for service in the Chicago-London market for the 1999 summer season.

By:  Patrick Murphy, Deputy Asst Secretary, Aviation and Intl Affairs


Allocation of Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

OST-99-5061 March 29, 1999 pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Objections of American Airlines to Order 99-3-20 Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

In Order 99-3-20, the Department called this "a positive aspect of American's proposal," and acknowledged that American "would offer travelers a choice of London airport services and certain beyond-London services not available at Heathrow" (p. 3). Nonetheless, the Department tentatively found that "we are not persuaded that the competitive benefits of American's once-daily Gatwick service, which it proposes to operate for less than half the summer season, outweigh the benefits of additional competitive service at Heathrow" (p. 4). American disagrees with the outcome of Department's balancing test, and believes that its Gatwick service would provide far greater competitive benefits than additional service by United to Heathrow, which would likewise operate "for less than half the summer season," inasmuch as neither applicant can be awarded in excess of 67 additional frequencies for the coming summer season.

Counsel:  American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647, carl_nelson@amrcorp.com


Allocation of Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

OST-99-5061 March 31, 1999 pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Reply to Objections of American to Order 99-3-20 of United Chicago - London

As United has previously noted, American could easily act on its convictions about the merits of increasing service to Gatwick. Even if American shifted one daily frequency from Heathrow to Gatwick for the entire summer season, it would still outschedule United on the Chicago-Heathrow route. That American has failed to do this indicates that perhaps, like the Department, American is not persuaded that the increased service and competitive benefits of once-daily Gatwick service outweigh the benefits of additional competitive service at Heathrow, the airport through which both [United and American] have chosen to concentrate their Chicago-London service.

Counsel:  Kirkland & Ellis, Jeffrey Manley for United, 202.879.5161


Allocation of Chicago-London Frequencies

Order 99-4-16
OST-99-5061
Issued April 15, 1999
Served April 16, 1999
pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Final Order

Scanned Version

Chicago-London Combination Service Frequencies

We have decided to make final our tentative decision and allocate 67 additional round-trip frequencies to United for use in the Chicago-London market. 

American has presented no arguments or evidence that refute these tentative conclusions. Rather, American has reiterated its previous arguments that its proposal to use the additional frequencies to serve Gatwick would constitute a better use of the additional frequencies. We fully considered American's argument in our tentative decision. Indeed, as we noted in our show-cause order, we found American's proposal to serve Gatwick to be an attractive feature of its application. However, we note that American was proposing to serve Gatwick for less than half the seven-month season, with the overall majority of its service operated through Heathrow. Against this background, we are not persuaded that American's proposed short-term service at Gatwick offers greater benefits in this case, particularly in view of the benefits of an allocation to United, which would use the additional flights to increase competition and consumer choice at Heathrow, the airport where both carriers have chosen to focus their services.

We are also unpersuaded by American's arguments that slot allocation at Chicago's O'Hare airport should affect our allocation of frequencies here. The issue in this case is how the additional frequencies in the Chicago-London market should be allocated between the only two carriers that can serve the market. In this regard, we note that American operates almost twice as much service in the Chicago-London summer season market as United and has all of the O'Hare slots necessary to operate these services. In these circumstances, we are not persuaded that the issues related to overall slot awards at O'Hare are relevant to the public interest factors affecting the frequency allocations for service in the Chicago-London market.

By:  Patrick Murphy


Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day