FAA Docket - Regulations.gov Posted Filings
5 Filings as of 04:03 pm Eastern Time
If clicking on 'Open/Download Filing' produces an error, then click on 'Open regulations.gov Docket Folder' to find the attachment(s).
Sign-Up to Receive Regulations.gov Posted Filings via Email - Updated on the Half-Hour
|
Comment from Boeing Commercial Airplane Concur, no additional comment will be forthcoming Comment Date:2023-05-25T04:00:00Z Comment On Document ID:FAA-2023-0932-0003 |
|
Comment from Air Line Pilots Association, Int'l See attached ALPA file(s) for Docket #FAA-2023-0657 Comment Date:2023-05-25T04:00:00Z Comment On Document ID:FAA-2023-0657-0006 |
|
Comment from Alicia Rosenthal See attached file(s) Comment Date:2023-05-25T04:00:00Z Comment On Document ID:FAA-2023-0855-0379 |
|
Comment from Rodrick Hurt I would like you to seriously to consider this comment as a request to take a closer look and mitigation of Noise pollution and reopen the FPL Part 150 for Fort Lauderdale Hollywood international airport. Particularly runway 10R-28L. This study was submitted for approval and comment during the height of the Covid pandemic which I am sure suppressed significantly needed commentary. Fort Lauderdale Hollywood international airport has created severe noise pollution and damage to the way of life in the parklands and unique locals. We live in a unique area with parks north,south,West, beautiful beaches and the atlantic ocean to the east. This area serves as a bird habitat for birds like the brown pelican to actual monkeys. This is a unique place and probably the only land that exist like this in the country. To provide a setting for you. Fort Lauderdale international airport is the only airport in the region that sits east of interstate 95 and west of Intercostal highway. This airport expanded its runway known as 10R-28L to the oppositions of citizens due to the level of noise contamination that it would create for residents and the Parklands in multiple locals in the region. This airport is one of 4 plus airports with in 30 minutes of each other. The airport extended this runway across us hwy 1 i into the parkland across the street. Describing this runway; itis 65 feet in the air at its highest point and is 8,000 feet long which is 1,000 feet shorter than its original northern runway. and slops downward 3 degrees per foot.This is a steep incline for a sea level airport. The airport and city commissioners understood the noise pollution that this airport would make so much so putting in place a time restriction on flights until FPL part 150 study was complete and framed this expanded runway as an auxiliary type use to its citizens and local leaders. See attachment 1. Well fast forward right after the FLPart 150 noise study was completed this runway has become a regular use runway for commercial flights causing horrible pollution extended as far east as my neighborhood in North Hollywood beach. I was perplexed to find that the FAA rule of the DNL allowed for a 24 hour additive noise pollution limit. I am concerned. the FL part 150 noise study 65 dl level and map does not even include my neighborhood in its plan however I can here the planes even on the interior of my home which is above 65 dbl which is equivalent to general conversation. The problem I have is that comments concerning this noise pollution levels have been manipulated using the current Faa rules that use the DNL rule to stay just under the 24 hour limit of noise pollution. if you see attachment 2 the map of a very tight 65 DL outline which maybe true using the 24 hour rule it is definitely not true depiction of noise pollution which is the decibel that an average level 2 noise plane would make using this runway. The current formula has allowed a gross misuse of the airport runway 10R-28L as intendedHere in North Hollywood Floridia so much so that the airport is allowed to excluded neighborhoods and parklands that should have been included in its FL Part 150 noise reduction study. Surely this extended runway would have failed its noise contamination limits had they not manipulated this rule from the FAA. I am asking at the minimum this FL Part 150 study for Fort Lauderdale Hollywood international airport be reopened and looked at taking into effect an extrapolation of what the noise pollution window actually looks like with its actual flight patterns not an extrapolation of noise over 24 hours where they airport can calculate in 0 decibels of noise for part of the 24 hour period. For reference see, attachment 2 showing 65 decibels boarders compared to flight the runway. and my area in North Hollywood Florida. which is not even included in a noise contamination area. Comment Date:2023-05-25T04:00:00Z Comment On Document ID:FAA-2023-0855-0387 |
|
Comment from Alexander Garry Van Nuys airport is sending way too many jets over Sherman Oaks, especially south of Ventura Blvd. at all hours of the day and night. They need to stop this ASAP. Low flying jets are destroying our once peaceful neighborhood. BUR airport is bad too, but VNY is sending more jets than BUR. I understand part of this is because of the closing of Santa Monica airport, but the residents of Sherman Oaks should not have to pay for that closure. Please help us and stop this non-stop parade of jets flying low over Sherman Oaks. It never used to be like this, it needs to go back to the way it was quickly. The residents are not going to stand for this much longer and will start to push for the closing of VNY airport. I am begging you, please help us. Comment Date:2023-05-25T04:00:00Z Comment On Document ID:FAA-2023-0855-0381 |
Regulations.gov and The US Federal government cannot verify and are not responsible for the accuracy or authenticity of the data or analyses derived from the data after the data has been retrieved from Regulations.gov.
This product uses the Regulations.gov Data API but is neither endorsed nor certified by Regulations.gov.